WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Questions and Answers

WBCS Main Preamble ,Citizenship Question

WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper –2023

1. Choose the correct statement stated in the Constitution of India :

(A) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Federation of States
(B) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States
(C) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Quasi Federal State
(D) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Unitary State

Answer: (B) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States

Explanation: Article 1 of the Indian Constitution begins with the declaration “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.” This phrasing was deliberately chosen by the framers, particularly Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, instead of “Federation of States.” The word “Union” signifies two important things: first, the Indian federation is not the result of an agreement among states (unlike the USA, where independent states came together voluntarily to form a union), and second, no state has the right to secede from the Union. This makes the Indian Union indestructible, even though it is federal in structure.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Constitutional ArticleArticle 1
Exact phrase used“India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States”
Why “Union” and not “Federation”Indicates the federation is not born of an agreement between states; states cannot secede
Coined/explained byDr. B. R. Ambedkar (in the Constituent Assembly debates)
Nature of Indian federationOften called “quasi-federal” or “federal with unitary bias” by scholars (e.g., K.C. Wheare), but the Constitution itself uses “Union of States,” not “Quasi Federal”

2. National Capital Territory of Delhi was constituted by

(A) Ordinance promulgated by the Lieutenant Governor
(B) Ordinance promulgated by the President
(C) 71 st Amendment
(D) 69 th Amendment

Answer: (D) 69th Amendment

Explanation: The Constitution (Sixty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1991, inserted Articles 239AA and 239AB into the Constitution, granting Delhi special status as the “National Capital Territory of Delhi” (NCT of Delhi). This amendment provided Delhi with its own Legislative Assembly and a Council of Ministers headed by a Chief Minister, while keeping certain subjects (like police, public order, and land) under the control of the Union Government through the Lieutenant Governor. This was a significant step giving Delhi partial statehood-like status without making it a full state.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment69th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1991
Articles insertedArticle 239AA and 239AB
New nomenclatureDelhi renamed as “National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCT of Delhi)”
Key provisionsLegislative Assembly for Delhi; Council of Ministers headed by Chief Minister
Subjects excluded from Delhi Assembly’s controlPublic Order, Police, and Land (remain with Union Government)
Administrative headLieutenant Governor (administrator) continues to represent the Union
Related ActGovernment of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act, 1991 (gives detailed operational framework)

3. The Sixth Schedule of the Constitution of India does not provide Administration for

(A) Assam
(B) Meghalaya
(C) Tripura
(D) Manipur

Answer: (D) Manipur

Explanation: The Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, under Article 244(2) and Article 275(1), provides for the administration of tribal areas in four northeastern states: Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram. It allows for the creation of Autonomous District Councils (ADCs) and Autonomous Regional Councils to give tribal communities self-governance over land, forest, and local customs. Manipur is notably excluded from the Sixth Schedule; instead, its hill areas are governed under Article 371C, which provides for a Hill Areas Committee in the State Legislative Assembly to look after the administration of hill areas.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Governing ArticlesArticle 244(2) and Article 275(1)
States covered under Sixth ScheduleAssam, Meghalaya, Tripura, Mizoram
State NOT coveredManipur
Manipur’s special provisionArticle 371C – special provision with respect to the State of Manipur (Hill Areas Committee)
Purpose of Sixth ScheduleAdministration of tribal areas via Autonomous District Councils (ADCs)

4. Which of the following amendments to the Constitution of India is also referred to as the ‘mini Constitution’?

(A) 38 th Amendment
(B) 42 nd Amendment
(C) 35 th Amendment
(D) 40 th Amendment

Answer: (B) 42nd Amendment

Explanation: The Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, enacted during the Emergency period under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s government, is widely known as the “Mini Constitution” because of the sheer scale and depth of changes it introduced. It amended the Preamble (adding “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity”), added Part IVA (Fundamental Duties), curtailed the powers of judicial review, extended the tenure of the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies, and made several other sweeping changes affecting the balance of power between the legislature, executive, and judiciary.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976
Nickname“Mini Constitution”
Enacted duringNational Emergency (1975–1977), under PM Indira Gandhi
Key changes to PreambleAdded “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity”
New Part addedPart IVA – Fundamental Duties (Article 51A)
Other major changesCurtailed judicial review powers; extended Lok Sabha/Assembly tenure from 5 to 6 years; strengthened Directive Principles over Fundamental Rights
Later developmentMany provisions of the 42nd Amendment were reviewed/reversed by the 43rd and 44th Amendments (1977–78)

5. Which part of the Constitution of India describes citizenship at the commencement of the Constitution?

(A) Part I
(B) Part II
(C) Part III
(D) Part IV

Answer: (B) Part II

Explanation: Part II of the Constitution of India, comprising Articles 5 to 11, deals with the provisions relating to citizenship at the commencement of the Constitution. It defines who became citizens of India on 26th January 1950, covering categories such as persons domiciled in India, migrants from Pakistan, persons of Indian origin residing outside India, and persons who voluntarily acquired foreign citizenship. Parliament was also empowered under Article 11 to regulate citizenship by law thereafter, which led to the enactment of the Citizenship Act, 1955.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Part of ConstitutionPart II
Articles coveredArticle 5 to Article 11
Subject matterCitizenship at the commencement of the Constitution (26 January 1950)
Article 5Citizenship by domicile in India at commencement
Article 6Rights of citizenship of certain persons who migrated from Pakistan
Article 7Rights of citizenship of certain migrants to Pakistan
Article 8Rights of citizenship of certain persons of Indian origin residing outside India
Article 9Persons voluntarily acquiring citizenship of a foreign state not to be citizens
Article 11Empowers Parliament to regulate citizenship by law (led to Citizenship Act, 1955)

6. Sanskrit is the 2 nd official language of which State in India?

(A) Karnataka
(B) Madhya Pradesh
(C) Uttarakhand
(D) Himachal Pradesh

Answer: (C) Uttarakhand

Explanation: Uttarakhand declared Sanskrit as its second official language in January 2010, alongside Hindi, which is the state’s primary official language. This decision was taken to promote and preserve Sanskrit, given the state’s historical and cultural association with ancient scriptures, temples (like those in Haridwar and Rishikesh), and traditional learning centers. Uttarakhand remains one of the very few states in India to accord Sanskrit this special official status.

Notes:

AspectDetail
StateUttarakhand
Sanskrit declared asSecond official language (alongside Hindi)
Year of declaration2010
ReasonCultural and religious significance — Uttarakhand is home to major pilgrimage sites (Haridwar, Rishikesh, Char Dham)
Primary official language of UttarakhandHindi
Other factsUttarakhand also has a “Sanskrit village” — Jhajjar (Mohalla), Karnataka, is famous for everyday conversational use of Sanskrit, but that is different from having “official language” status

7. The original Constitution of India was handwritten by

(A) Rafi Ahmed Kidwai
(B) Prem Behari Narain Raizada
(C) Kailash Nath Katju
(D) Kanaiyalal Maneklal Munshi

Answer: (B) Prem Behari Narain Raizada

Explanation: The original copies of the Constitution of India (both English and Hindi versions) were handwritten, not typed or printed, in a flowing italic calligraphic style. Prem Behari Narain Raizada, a renowned calligrapher, handwrote the entire English version of the Constitution using pen and ink, taking about six months to complete the task. He reportedly did not accept any payment for this work except for requesting that his and his grandfather’s names be inscribed at the end of every part/chapter of the Constitution, which was granted. The Constitution was later beautifully illustrated and decorated by artists from Shantiniketan, including Nandalal Bose.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Calligrapher (English version)Prem Behari Narain Raizada
Writing styleFlowing italic calligraphic style
Time takenApproximately 6 months
PaymentHe did not accept payment; only requested his name and grandfather’s name be inscribed in every part
Hindi version calligrapherVasant Krishna Vaidya
Illustrations/artworkDone by artists from Shantiniketan under the guidance of Nandalal Bose
Where original copies are keptPreserved in a special helium-filled case in the Library of the Parliament of India

8. The National Flag of Indian Union was adopted on _______.

(A) 15 th August, 1947
(B) 26 th November, 1949
(C) 22 nd July, 1947
(D) 26 th January, 1950

Answer: (C) 22nd July, 1947

Explanation: The National Flag of India, in its present tricolour form (with the Ashoka Chakra at the center instead of the earlier spinning wheel/charkha), was adopted by the Constituent Assembly of India on 22nd July, 1947 — just a few weeks before India attained independence on 15th August, 1947. The flag was designed based on the Swaraj flag of the Indian National Congress, with the charkha replaced by the Ashoka Chakra (a 24-spoke wheel) to represent the eternal wheel of law (Dharma Chakra) as a more universal and inclusive symbol for independent India.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Date of adoption22nd July, 1947
Adopted byConstituent Assembly of India
Basis of designSwaraj Flag of Indian National Congress (designed by Pingali Venkayya)
Key change madeCharkha (spinning wheel) replaced with Ashoka Chakra (24-spoke wheel)
ColoursSaffron (top) – courage/sacrifice; White (middle) – truth/peace; Green (bottom) – fertility/growth
Ashoka Chakra representsDharma Chakra (Wheel of Law), taken from the Lion Capital of Ashoka at Sarnath

9. The Constitution declares India to be a sovereign, socialist, democratic republic, assuring citizens of justice, equality and liberty, and endeavours to promote fraternity among them. The words “socialist” and “secular” were added to the definition in year:

(A) 1956
(B) 1976
(C) 1970
(D) 1952

Answer: (B) 1976

Explanation: The words “Socialist” and “Secular” (along with “Integrity”) were added to the Preamble of the Indian Constitution by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, enacted during the period of National Emergency under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s government. Before this amendment, the Preamble described India only as a “Sovereign Democratic Republic.” After the amendment, it now reads “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic.” This is the only amendment made to the Preamble till date.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976
Words added to Preamble“Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity”
Original Preamble wording (1950)“Sovereign Democratic Republic”
Amended Preamble wording (1976 onward)“Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic”
Enacted duringNational Emergency (1975–1977)
Times Preamble has been amendedOnly once, in 1976 (via 42nd Amendment)
Related fact42nd Amendment is also called the “Mini Constitution” due to its extensive changes

10. 53 rd Amendment of the Indian Constitution 1986 made full Statehood for

(A) Mizoram
(B) Tripura
(C) Manipur
(D) Meghalaya

Answer: (A) Mizoram

Explanation: The Constitution (Fifty-third Amendment) Act, 1986, inserted Article 371G into the Constitution, granting full statehood to Mizoram. This came about following the Mizo Accord (Memorandum of Settlement) signed in June 1986 between the Government of India and the Mizo National Front (MNF) leader Laldenga, which ended decades of insurgency in the region. Mizoram thus became the 23rd state of the Indian Union, effective from 20th February 1987.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment53rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1986
Article insertedArticle 371G – Special provision with respect to the State of Mizoram
State granted statehoodMizoram
Statehood effective date20th February 1987
Sequence in Indian UnionMizoram became the 23rd state of India
BackgroundMizo Accord (1986) between Government of India and Mizo National Front (Laldenga) ending Mizo insurgency
Special protections under 371GProtects Mizo customary law, religious/social practices; ownership/transfer of land in Mizoram cannot be legislated by Parliament without State Assembly’s consent

11. The 10 th Schedule of the Indian Constitution talks about

(A) Municipalities
(B) Forms of Oaths
(C) Validation of Regulations
(D) Anti Defection Act

Answer: (D) Anti Defection Act

Explanation: The Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India, popularly known as the “Anti-Defection Law,” was added by the Constitution (Fifty-second Amendment) Act, 1985. It lays down the provisions for disqualification of Members of Parliament and State Legislatures on the grounds of defection — that is, if they voluntarily give up membership of their political party or vote/abstain contrary to the party whip without prior permission. This was introduced to curb political defections that led to government instability, especially the phenomenon popularly known as “Aaya Ram, Gaya Ram.”

Notes:

AspectDetail
ScheduleTenth Schedule
Popular nameAnti-Defection Law
Added by52nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1985
PurposeDisqualification of MPs/MLAs on grounds of defection
Grounds for disqualificationVoluntarily giving up party membership; voting/abstaining against party whip without permission
Deciding authorityPresiding Officer of the House (Speaker/Chairman)
Landmark caseKihoto Hollohan vs. Zachillhu (1992) – upheld constitutional validity of the Tenth Schedule, but made the Speaker’s decision subject to judicial review
Famous phrase associated“Aaya Ram, Gaya Ram” (referring to frequent political defections in Haryana in the 1960s)

12. Which Schedule of the Constitution of India prescribes the Forms of Oaths or Affirmations ?

(A) 11 th Schedule
(B) 4 th Schedule
(C) 3 rd Schedule
(D) 5 th Schedule

Answer: (C) 3rd Schedule

Explanation: The Third Schedule of the Indian Constitution contains the various forms of Oaths or Affirmations that must be taken by different constitutional functionaries before entering upon their office. This includes oaths for Union Ministers, candidates for elections to Parliament, Members of Parliament, Judges of the Supreme Court, the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India, State Ministers, candidates for State Legislature elections, Members of State Legislature, and Judges of High Courts. Notably, the oath for the President and Governors is given directly in the Constitution’s articles (Article 60 and Article 159), not in the Third Schedule.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ScheduleThird Schedule
Subject matterForms of Oaths or Affirmations
Who takes these oathsUnion Ministers, MPs, Supreme Court Judges, CAG, State Ministers, MLAs, High Court Judges, election candidates
Notable exclusionsOath of President (Article 60) and Governor (Article 159) are prescribed directly in the Constitution’s text, not the Third Schedule
Related schedules (for comparison)Fourth Schedule – allocation of Rajya Sabha seats to States/UTs; Fifth Schedule – administration of Scheduled Areas/Tribes; Eleventh Schedule – Panchayats (73rd Amendment)

13. How many Articles were written on the Constitution when it came into effect?

(A) 410 Articles
(B) 415 Articles
(C) 365 Articles
(D) 395 Articles

Answer: (D) 395 Articles

Explanation: When the Constitution of India was originally adopted on 26th November 1949 and came into effect on 26th January 1950, it contained 395 Articles, divided into 22 Parts, along with 8 Schedules. This made it the longest written constitution in the world at the time of its adoption. Over the years, through various amendments, the number of Articles has increased (with articles being added as sub-numbered provisions like 21A, 35A, 371A etc.), though some have also been repealed.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Original number of Articles395
Original number of Parts22
Original number of Schedules8
Date of adoption26th November 1949
Date of commencement26th January 1950
Current statusNumber of Articles has increased over time (currently around 448 Articles, 25 Parts, 12 Schedules) due to various amendments
World rankingIndia has the longest written constitution in the world

14. What does the 8 th Schedule of the Indian Constitution deals with?

(A) Administration of Tribal Areas
(B) Panchayat Raj
(C) Official Languages
(D) Municipalities

Answer: (C) Official Languages

Explanation: The Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution contains the list of recognized/scheduled languages of India. Originally, it had 14 languages, but over time, through various constitutional amendments (notably the 21st, 71st, and 92nd Amendments), more languages were added, bringing the current total to 22 languages. This schedule is significant for promoting and developing regional languages and is often the basis for language-related government policies, such as translation of official documents and competitive exams.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ScheduleEighth Schedule
Subject matterList of recognized/scheduled languages of India
Original number of languages (1950)14
Current number of languages22
Key amendments adding languages21st Amendment (1967) – added Sindhi; 71st Amendment (1992) – added Konkani, Manipuri, Nepali; 92nd Amendment (2003) – added Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, Santhali
Most recently added language notes92nd Amendment (2003) brought the total to 22
Related schedules (for comparison)Sixth Schedule – Administration of Tribal Areas (Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, Mizoram); Eleventh Schedule – Panchayats; Twelfth Schedule – Municipalities

15. The Preamble of the Indian Constitution was inspired by the Preamble of the Constitution of which country?

(A) U.S. Constitution
(B) Swiss Constitution
(C) British Constitution
(D) Constitution of Canada

Answer: (A) U.S. Constitution

Explanation: The idea and structure of having a Preamble to the Constitution — a brief introductory statement setting out the guiding principles, purpose, and philosophy of the document — was borrowed from the Constitution of the United States of America. The US Constitution’s Preamble begins with “We the People of the United States…” and the Indian Constitution’s Preamble similarly begins with “WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA…”, reflecting that ultimate sovereignty and authority rest with the people of India.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Source of inspirationUnited States (US) Constitution
Opening phrase of Indian Preamble“WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA…”
Opening phrase of US Preamble“We the People of the United States…”
Significance of “We the People”Establishes that sovereignty and authority of the Constitution flow from the people of India
Constitutional status of PreambleConsidered the “Soul” of the Constitution; part of the Basic Structure (as held in Kesavananda Bharati case, 1973)
Amendability of PreambleCan be amended, but the Basic Structure/fundamental philosophy cannot be altered (only amended once so far — 42nd Amendment, 1976)

16. At which of its session, did the Congress officially accept the ‘Socialistic pattern of Society’?

(A) Bombay Session of 1953
(B) Avadi Session of 1955
(C) Calcutta Session of 1957
(D) Nagpur Session of 1959

Answer: (B) Avadi Session of 1955

Explanation: At the Avadi Session of the Indian National Congress, held in January 1955 near Chennai (Madras), the Congress officially adopted the goal of a “Socialistic Pattern of Society” as its objective for economic and social development. This resolution laid the ideological foundation for the country’s subsequent Five-Year Plans (particularly the Second Five-Year Plan, formulated under P.C. Mahalanobis) to focus on public sector-led industrialization, planned economic development, and reduction of economic disparities, while still retaining a mixed economy framework.

Notes:

AspectDetail
SessionAvadi Session, Indian National Congress
Year1955
LocationAvadi, near Madras (now Chennai)
Resolution adopted“Socialistic Pattern of Society” as the goal of Indian economic policy
ImpactProvided ideological basis for the Second Five-Year Plan (1956–61), emphasizing heavy industries and public sector
Key economist associated with subsequent planningP.C. Mahalanobis (architect of the Second Five-Year Plan model)
Related later developmentThe word “Socialist” was added to the Constitution’s Preamble only later, via the 42nd Amendment in 1976 — these are two distinct events, though thematically connected

17. Who among the following gave the following statement about the Indian Constitution? ‘Indian Constitution strikes a good balance between extreme rigidity and too much flexibility.’

(A) B. R. Ambedkar
(B) M.V. Pylee
(C) Alexandrowicz
(D) K.C. Wheare

Answer: (A) B. R. Ambedkar

Explanation: Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, the Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Constituent Assembly, made this observation regarding the amendment process of the Indian Constitution under Article 368. He emphasized that the Constitution’s framers deliberately designed a flexible-cum-rigid amendment procedure — some provisions can be amended by a simple parliamentary majority, others require a special majority, and a few additionally need ratification by at least half the state legislatures. This blended approach ensures the Constitution remains adaptable to changing needs while safeguarding its core federal and fundamental structure from being changed too easily.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Quoted personDr. B. R. Ambedkar
ContextDiscussing the amendment procedure under Article 368
Core ideaThe Indian Constitution balances rigidity (needed for stability) and flexibility (needed for adaptability)
Three types of amendment procedures(1) Simple majority (like ordinary law); (2) Special majority (2/3rd of members present and voting + majority of total membership); (3) Special majority + ratification by half the states (for federal provisions)
Governing ArticleArticle 368

18. From which country was the idea of ‘Concurrent List’ in the Indian Constitution borrowed?

(A) Japan
(B) United States
(C) Australia
(D) China

Answer: (C) Australia

Explanation: The concept of the Concurrent List — a list of subjects on which both the Union (Central) and State Governments can legislate — was borrowed from the Australian Constitution. Under the Indian Constitution’s Seventh Schedule, the Concurrent List (List III) contains subjects such as education, forests, marriage and divorce, criminal law, and economic and social planning, where both Parliament and State Legislatures have concurrent power to make laws. In case of a conflict between a Union law and a State law on the same subject, the Union law generally prevails (as per Article 254), unless the State law has received Presidential assent.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ConceptConcurrent List (List III)
Source countryAustralia
Location in ConstitutionSeventh Schedule, List III
Total lists in Seventh ScheduleUnion List (List I), State List (List II), Concurrent List (List III)
Governing conflict-resolution ArticleArticle 254 – Union law prevails over State law in case of repugnancy, unless State law has received Presidential assent
Sample subjects in Concurrent ListEducation, Forests, Marriage & Divorce, Criminal Law & Procedure, Economic & Social Planning, Trade Unions

19. How many schedules are there in the Indian Constitution?

(A) 22
(B) 17
(C) 97
(D) 12

Answer: (D) 12

Explanation: The Constitution of India currently has 12 Schedules. Originally, when the Constitution was adopted in 1950, it had only 8 Schedules. Over time, through various constitutional amendments, additional schedules were added — the Ninth Schedule (by the 1st Amendment, 1951), the Tenth Schedule (Anti-Defection Law, by the 52nd Amendment, 1985), the Eleventh Schedule (Panchayats, by the 73rd Amendment, 1992), and the Twelfth Schedule (Municipalities, by the 74th Amendment, 1992), bringing the total to 12.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Current number of Schedules12
Original number of Schedules (1950)8
Ninth Schedule added by1st Amendment Act, 1951 (protects certain laws from judicial review)
Tenth Schedule added by52nd Amendment Act, 1985 (Anti-Defection Law)
Eleventh Schedule added by73rd Amendment Act, 1992 (Panchayati Raj Institutions – 29 subjects)
Twelfth Schedule added by74th Amendment Act, 1992 (Municipalities – 18 subjects)

20. In which year did Goa became the 25th State of India ?

(A) 1987
(B) 1988
(C) 1989
(D) 1990

Answer: (A) 1987

Explanation: Goa, along with Daman and Diu, was liberated from Portuguese colonial rule in 1961 and was initially administered as a Union Territory. On 30th May 1987, through the Goa, Daman and Diu Reorganisation Act, 1987, Goa was granted full statehood and became the 25th State of the Indian Union. Daman and Diu, on the other hand, continued as a separate Union Territory after the bifurcation.

Notes:

AspectDetail
EventGoa attained full statehood
Year1987 (30th May 1987)
Governing ActGoa, Daman and Diu Reorganisation Act, 1987
Sequence in Indian UnionGoa became the 25th State of India
Prior statusUnion Territory (along with Daman and Diu) since liberation from Portuguese rule in 1961
BifurcationDaman and Diu remained a separate Union Territory after Goa’s statehood
Related factMizoram and Arunachal Pradesh also attained statehood around the same period — Mizoram on 20 February 1987 (23rd state), Arunachal Pradesh on 20 February 1987 (24th state), and Goa shortly after on 30 May 1987 (25th state)

21. Which schedule contains ‘Forms of Oath and Affirmations’ ?

(A) Eleventh Schedule
(B) Fourth Schedule
(C) Third Schedule
(D) Fifth Schedule

Answer: (C) Third Schedule

Explanation: This is the same concept as tested earlier in this paper (Question 12). The Third Schedule of the Indian Constitution lays down the various forms of Oaths or Affirmations to be taken by constitutional functionaries — including Union Ministers, candidates and members of Parliament, Judges of the Supreme Court, the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India, State Ministers, candidates and members of State Legislatures, and Judges of High Courts — before assuming their respective offices.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ScheduleThird Schedule
Subject matterForms of Oaths or Affirmations
Functionaries coveredUnion Ministers, MPs, Supreme Court Judges, CAG, State Ministers, MLAs, High Court Judges
Notable exclusionsPresident’s oath (Article 60) and Governor’s oath (Article 159) are given directly in the Constitution’s text, not in the Third Schedule
Related schedules (for comparison)Fourth Schedule – Allocation of Rajya Sabha seats to States/UTs; Fifth Schedule – Administration of Scheduled Areas & Scheduled Tribes; Eleventh Schedule – Panchayats (73rd Amendment)

22. The States were reorganized in the year 1956 mainly on the basis of which criteria?

(A) External and internal security
(B) Administration facility
(C) Linguistic and cultural uniformity
(D) Geographic similarity and resource allocation

Answer: (C) Linguistic and cultural uniformity

Explanation: The States Reorganisation Act, 1956, was enacted based on the recommendations of the States Reorganisation Commission (SRC), headed by Fazl Ali, along with members H.N. Kunzru and K.M. Panikkar. The Commission recommended that state boundaries be redrawn primarily on the basis of linguistic and cultural uniformity, so that people speaking the same language and sharing a common cultural heritage could be governed together. This was a response to widespread demands for linguistic states, most notably triggered by the agitation for a separate Andhra state (leading to the formation of Andhra Pradesh in 1953, following the fast unto death of Potti Sriramulu).

Notes:

AspectDetail
ActStates Reorganisation Act, 1956
Basis of reorganizationLinguistic and cultural uniformity
CommissionStates Reorganisation Commission (SRC), 1953
Chairman of SRCFazl Ali
Other members of SRCH. N. Kunzru, K. M. Panikkar
Trigger eventFormation of Andhra State (1953) after Potti Sriramulu’s fast-unto-death death, demanding a Telugu-speaking state
Number of states/UTs created (1956)Reorganized India into 14 states and 6 Union Territories
Related earlier commissionDhar Commission (1948) and JVP Committee (1948–49) initially opposed linguistic reorganization, but public pressure led to the SRC being formed

23. Which Amendment Act made Sikkim a full-fledged State of India ?

(A) 34 th Constitutional Amendment Act
(B) 35 th Constitutional Amendment Act
(C) 36 th Constitutional Amendment Act
(D) 37 th Constitutional Amendment Act

Answer: (C) 36th Constitutional Amendment Act

Explanation: Sikkim’s integration with India occurred in two stages. First, the 35th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1974, gave Sikkim the status of an “Associate State” of India by inserting Article 2A and the Tenth Schedule (a different, now-repealed Tenth Schedule dealing with Sikkim’s terms of association, not to be confused with today’s Anti-Defection Tenth Schedule). Following a referendum in Sikkim in April 1975, in which the people voted overwhelmingly to merge with India and abolish the monarchy, the 36th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1975, made Sikkim a full-fledged State of the Indian Union — the 22nd state — by amending Article 371F and omitting Article 2A along with the earlier Tenth Schedule provisions.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment granting full statehood36th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1975
Prior step: Associate State statusGranted by 35th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1974 (inserted Article 2A)
ReferendumHeld in April 1975; Sikkimese people voted to merge with India and abolish monarchy
Article dealing with Sikkim’s special provisionsArticle 371F
Sequence in Indian UnionSikkim became the 22nd State of India
Political contextEnd of the Chogyal (monarchy) rule in Sikkim

24. Which Act granted Statehood to Arunachal Pradesh?

(A) Constitution Act, 1981
(B) Constitution Act, 1987
(C) Government of India Act, 1981
(D) Government of India Act, 1987

Answer: (B) Constitution Act, 1987

Explanation: Arunachal Pradesh, formerly known as the North-East Frontier Agency (NEFA), was granted the status of a Union Territory in 1972. It was subsequently elevated to full statehood through the State of Arunachal Pradesh Act, 1986 (also referred to in some sources loosely as a “Constitution Act, 1987” due to it coming into effect on 20th February 1987). Arunachal Pradesh became the 24th State of the Indian Union on 20th February 1987, the same day Mizoram also attained statehood.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Governing ActState of Arunachal Pradesh Act, 1986 (effective from 20 Feb 1987)
Former nameNorth-East Frontier Agency (NEFA)
Status before statehoodUnion Territory (from 1972)
Statehood effective date20th February 1987
Sequence in Indian Union24th State of India
Same-day statehoodMizoram also became a state (23rd) on the same date, 20 Feb 1987

25. From which country was the idea of concurrent list borrowed in India?

(A) Japan
(B) United States of America
(C) Australia
(D) China

Answer: (C) Australia

Explanation: The concept of the Concurrent List — where both the Union Parliament and State Legislatures can make laws on the same subjects listed in List III of the Seventh Schedule — was borrowed from the Australian Constitution. Subjects like education, forests, criminal law, marriage and divorce, and economic and social planning fall under this list. In the event of a conflict between central and state laws on a concurrent subject, the central law generally prevails under Article 254, unless the state law has received the President’s assent.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ConceptConcurrent List (List III)
Source countryAustralia
Location in ConstitutionSeventh Schedule, List III
Three lists in Seventh ScheduleUnion List (List I), State List (List II), Concurrent List (List III)
Conflict-resolution ArticleArticle 254 – Union law prevails, unless State law received Presidential assent
Sample subjectsEducation, Forests, Marriage & Divorce, Criminal Law, Economic & Social Planning

26. Which among the following languages was included in the eighth schedule by Constitution (21st ) amendment Bill on 10 April 1967?

(A) Assamese
(B) Sindhi
(C) Gujarati
(D) Konkani

Answer: (B) Sindhi

Explanation: The Constitution (Twenty-first Amendment) Act, 1967, added Sindhi to the Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, raising the total number of scheduled languages from 14 to 15 at that time. This inclusion was significant because Sindhi was the language of the Sindhi-speaking community that migrated to India after Partition (since Sindh became part of Pakistan), and it did not correspond to any specific Indian state, unlike most other scheduled languages.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment21st Constitutional Amendment Act, 1967
Language addedSindhi
Number of languages before this amendment14
Number of languages after this amendment15
Special note about SindhiNot tied to any specific Indian state (unlike most Eighth Schedule languages); spoken by the Sindhi community that migrated from Sindh (now in Pakistan) after Partition
Other Eighth Schedule expansion amendments71st Amendment (1992) – added Konkani, Manipuri, Nepali (making total 18); 92nd Amendment (2003) – added Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, Santhali (making total 22)
Current total languages in 8th Schedule22

27. Who was elected as the Permanent President of the Constituent Assembly ?

(A) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(B) B. R. Ambedkar
(C) Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel
(D) Frank Anthony

Answer: (A) Dr. Rajendra Prasad

Explanation: Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the permanent President (Chairman) of the Constituent Assembly of India on 11th December 1946, two days after the Assembly’s first session on 9th December 1946. He presided over the Assembly throughout the constitution-making process, which took nearly three years to complete, and later went on to become the first President of independent India. Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha had earlier served as the temporary/provisional Chairman at the very first sitting on 9th December 1946.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Permanent President of Constituent AssemblyDr. Rajendra Prasad
Date elected11th December 1946
First session date9th December 1946
Temporary/interim Chairman (first sitting only)Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha
Later role of Dr. Rajendra PrasadFirst President of independent India
Chairman of the Drafting Committee (different role)Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
Total time taken by Constituent AssemblyApprox. 2 years, 11 months, and 18 days (commonly rounded to “about 3 years”)

28. Which Right was not taken from the British Constitution in the Indian Constitution?

(A) Freedom of Press
(B) Right to Vote
(C) Fundamental Rights
(D) Educational Rights

Answer: (C) Fundamental Rights

Explanation: The concept of Fundamental Rights (Part III of the Indian Constitution) was borrowed from the Constitution of the United States of America, particularly the American Bill of Rights, and not from the British Constitution. This is because the British Constitution is largely unwritten and uncodified, relying on parliamentary sovereignty and conventions rather than a codified bill of enforceable fundamental rights. In contrast, several other features of the Indian parliamentary and legal system — such as the concept of the Rule of Law, parliamentary form of government, single citizenship, and law-making procedures — were indeed borrowed from Britain.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Feature not borrowed from BritainFundamental Rights (Part III)
Actual source of Fundamental RightsUnited States of America (Bill of Rights)
Reason Britain couldn’t be the sourceBritish Constitution is unwritten/uncodified; relies on parliamentary sovereignty, not an enforceable bill of rights
Features actually borrowed from BritainParliamentary form of government, Rule of Law, Single citizenship, Legislative procedure, Prerogative writs, Bicameralism (partly), Cabinet system
Features borrowed from USA (for comparison)Fundamental Rights, Judicial Review, Independence of Judiciary, Impeachment procedure of President, Post of Vice-President

29. The original Constitution of India had how many Articles and Schedules?

(A) 392 Articles and 7 Schedules
(B) 395 Articles and 8 Schedules
(C) 395 Articles and 6 Schedules
(D) 396 Articles and 4 Schedules

Answer: (B) 395 Articles and 8 Schedules

Explanation: When the Constitution of India was originally adopted on 26th November 1949 and came into force on 26th January 1950, it contained 395 Articles divided into 22 Parts, along with 8 Schedules. This is a companion fact to Question 13 in this same paper, which asked specifically about the number of Articles. Over subsequent decades, through various amendments, both the number of Articles (via insertions like 21A, 35A) and Schedules (Ninth through Twelfth added later) have increased.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Original number of Articles395
Original number of Parts22
Original number of Schedules8
Date of adoption26th November 1949
Date of commencement26th January 1950
Current number of Schedules12 (after Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, Twelfth added via later amendments)
Current number of Articles (approx.)Around 448 (due to insertions/deletions over time)

30. In India the concept of single citizenship is adopted from

(A) The French Constitution
(B) The Swiss Constitution
(C) The Constitution of United States of America
(D) The British Constitution

Answer: (D) The British Constitution

Explanation: India follows the concept of “Single Citizenship,” meaning that every Indian citizen, irrespective of the state they belong to or reside in, is a citizen of India as a whole — there is no separate state citizenship as seen in countries like the USA (which follows “Dual Citizenship,” where a person is a citizen of both the country and the specific state). This concept of single citizenship in India was borrowed from the British Constitution, and it aims to promote unity and integrity of the nation, avoiding regional discrimination among citizens across different states.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ConceptSingle Citizenship
Source countryUnited Kingdom (British Constitution)
MeaningEvery Indian is a citizen of India only, not separately of any state
Contrast exampleUSA follows Dual Citizenship — citizens hold both national citizenship and separate state citizenship
Purpose in IndiaPromotes national unity and integrity; avoids regional bias/discrimination
Governing constitutional provisionsPart II (Articles 5–11) deals with citizenship at commencement; Citizenship Act, 1955 governs subsequent regulation
Other features borrowed from Britain (for comparison)Parliamentary system, Rule of Law, Cabinet system, Bicameralism, Prerogative writs

WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper – 2022

1. Which is the correct sequence in the Preamble of the Constitution of India ?

(A) Sovereign, Secular, Socialist, Democratic, Republic
(B) Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Republic, Democratic
(C) Sovereign, Secular, Socialist, Republic, Democratic
(D) Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic, Republic

Answer: (D) Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic, Republic

Explanation: The Preamble to the Constitution of India, as amended by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976, describes India as a “SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC.” This is the exact and fixed sequence in which these descriptive words appear in the Preamble, and the order matters for exam purposes. Originally (before 1976), the Preamble only described India as “Sovereign Democratic Republic” — the words “Socialist” and “Secular” were inserted in between “Sovereign” and “Democratic” by the 42nd Amendment.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Correct sequence in PreambleSovereign → Socialist → Secular → Democratic → Republic
Amendment that fixed this sequence42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976
Original (1950) sequenceSovereign → Democratic → Republic
Words inserted in 1976“Socialist” and “Secular” (placed between “Sovereign” and “Democratic”)
Word “Integrity” also added in 1976Yes, in the phrase “Unity and Integrity of the Nation” (Fraternity clause)

2. “Economic Justice” as one of the objectives of the constitution of India has been provided in

(A) Preamble and Fundamental Rights
(B) Preamble and Directive Principles
(C) Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles
(D) Preamble, Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles

Answer: (B) Preamble and Directive Principles

Explanation: The concept of “Economic Justice” appears explicitly in the Preamble to the Constitution of India, which resolves to secure to all citizens “Justice, social, economic and political.” This objective is further elaborated and given concrete shape through the Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV), particularly Articles 38 and 39, which direct the State to strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing a social order in which justice — social, economic, and political — informs all institutions of national life, and to ensure equitable distribution of resources and prevention of concentration of wealth. Fundamental Rights (Part III), on the other hand, primarily deal with civil and political liberties, not economic justice per se.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Where “Economic Justice” appearsPreamble and Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV)
Preamble reference“Justice, social, economic and political”
Key DPSP Articles related to Economic JusticeArticle 38 (social order for justice); Article 39 (equitable distribution of resources, prevention of wealth concentration)
Why NOT Fundamental RightsPart III primarily protects civil/political liberties (equality, freedom, life & liberty) — not explicitly economic justice as a directive goal
Part dealing with DPSPPart IV (Articles 36–51)
DPSP source of inspirationIrish Constitution

3. How many scheduled languages are there in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution of India ?

(A) 12
(B) 17
(C) 22
(D) 24

Answer: (C) 22

Explanation: The Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution currently contains 22 scheduled languages. It originally had 14 languages in 1950. Over the years, several amendments added more languages: the 21st Amendment (1967) added Sindhi (making it 15); the 71st Amendment (1992) added Konkani, Manipuri, and Nepali (making it 18); and the 92nd Amendment (2003) added Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, and Santhali (making it 22, the current total).

Notes:

AspectDetail
Current number of scheduled languages22
Original number (1950)14
21st Amendment (1967)Added Sindhi → total became 15
71st Amendment (1992)Added Konkani, Manipuri, Nepali → total became 18
92nd Amendment (2003)Added Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, Santhali → total became 22 (current)

4. How many members were there in the Constituent Assembly ?

(A) 389
(B) 192
(C) 289
(D) 292

Answer: (A) 389

Explanation: The Constituent Assembly of India, as originally constituted under the Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946, was to have 389 members in total. Of these, 292 members were to be elected from the British Indian provinces, 4 members from the Chief Commissioner’s provinces, and 93 members were to represent the Princely States. However, after the Partition of India in 1947 and the withdrawal of Muslim League members (who went to Pakistan’s Constituent Assembly), the actual strength of the Assembly that framed the Constitution was reduced to 299 members.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Original total strength (as per Cabinet Mission Plan, 1946)389
Break-up of original 389292 from British Indian provinces + 4 from Chief Commissioner’s provinces + 93 from Princely States
Strength after Partition (1947)Reduced to 299 (due to withdrawal of Muslim League members who went to Pakistan)
Basis of formationCabinet Mission Plan, 1946

5. Who was the advisor of the Constituent Assembly ?

(A) B. R. Ambedkar
(B) B. N. Rao
(C) Alldai Krishnaswamy
(D) T. T. Krishnamachari

Answer: (B) B. N. Rao

Explanation: Sir Benegal Narsing Rau (B. N. Rau) served as the Constitutional Advisor to the Constituent Assembly of India. He played a crucial behind-the-scenes role in the constitution-making process by preparing the initial draft of the Constitution based on the discussions and decisions of the various committees, before it was handed over to the Drafting Committee headed by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar for detailed scrutiny and finalization. B. N. Rau also traveled to several countries to study their constitutions before drafting the initial version, and he later became a judge at the International Court of Justice.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Constitutional AdvisorSir Benegal Narsing Rau (B. N. Rau)
RolePrepared the original/initial draft of the Constitution before it went to the Drafting Committee
Chairman of Drafting Committee (different role)Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
Later careerBecame a judge at the International Court of Justice (ICJ)
Preparatory workStudied constitutions of various countries before drafting India’s initial draft
Other notable members mentioned in optionsAlladi Krishnaswamy Ayyar and T. T. Krishnamachari were both members of the Drafting Committee, not the Constitutional Advisor

6. The Objective Resolution in the Constituent Assembly was moved by

(A) Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru
(B) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(C) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(D) Lord Mountbatten

Answer: (A) Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru

Explanation: The Objective Resolution was moved by Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru in the Constituent Assembly on 13th December 1946 and was adopted on 22nd January 1947. This resolution laid down the fundamental philosophy and guiding principles for the framing of the Constitution — declaring India to be an independent sovereign republic, guaranteeing justice, equality, and freedom to all its people, and providing for adequate safeguards for minorities and backward classes. The Objective Resolution later formed the basis of the Preamble to the Constitution.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Moved byPandit Jawaharlal Nehru
Date moved13th December 1946
Date adopted22nd January 1947
SignificanceLaid down the basic philosophy and objectives of the Constitution; became the basis of the Preamble
Key elements of the resolutionIndia as an Independent Sovereign Republic; Justice, equality, and freedom for all; safeguards for minorities and backward/tribal areas

7. The ideals of “liberty, equality and fraternity” in the Preamble of the Constitution of India is inspired by

(A) Russian revolution
(B) French revolution
(C) Marxian thoughts
(D) Gandhian thoughts

Answer: (B) French revolution

Explanation: The trio of ideals — “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity” — enshrined in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution was directly inspired by the French Revolution (1789), whose famous slogan was “Liberté, égalité, fraternité” (Liberty, Equality, Fraternity). These three ideals became a cornerstone of modern democratic and republican thought worldwide, and the framers of the Indian Constitution consciously borrowed this triad to reflect India’s own commitment to individual freedom, social and legal equality, and a sense of common brotherhood among its diverse population.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Source of inspirationFrench Revolution (1789)
Original French slogan“Liberté, égalité, fraternité”
Where it appears in Indian ConstitutionPreamble
Meaning of “Liberty” in PreambleLiberty of thought, expression, belief, faith, and worship
Meaning of “Equality” in PreambleEquality of status and opportunity
Meaning of “Fraternity” in PreambleAssuring dignity of the individual and unity/integrity of the nation

8. The Fundamental Duties in the Constitution of India were adopted from

(A) American Constitution
(B) Russian Constitution
(C) Canadian Constitution
(D) French Constitution

Answer: (B) Russian Constitution

Explanation: The concept of Fundamental Duties, incorporated in Part IVA (Article 51A) of the Indian Constitution by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976, was borrowed from the Constitution of the erstwhile Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR/Russia). This provision was added on the recommendation of the Swaran Singh Committee, which was set up to suggest amendments to the Constitution during the Emergency period. Originally, there were 10 Fundamental Duties; an 11th duty (relating to the duty of parents/guardians to provide education to children aged 6–14 years) was added later by the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ConceptFundamental Duties
Source countryRussia (erstwhile USSR)
Part & ArticlePart IVA, Article 51A
Introduced by42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976
Recommending committeeSwaran Singh Committee
Original number of duties10
Current number of duties11
11th duty added by86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002 (duty to provide education to children aged 6–14 years)

9. The Constitution of India adopted the federal system from the Act of

(A) 1919
(B) 1935
(C) 1947
(D) 1909

Answer: (B) 1935

Explanation: The federal scheme of government in the Indian Constitution — including the distribution of powers between the Centre and States through the Union List, State List, and Concurrent List, as well as many administrative and structural features — was substantially borrowed from the Government of India Act, 1935. This Act had itself proposed an All-India Federation (which never came fully into force due to the reluctance of Princely States to join), but many of its provisions relating to federal structure, provincial autonomy, and administrative details were retained and adapted by the framers of the Indian Constitution.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Source Act for federal systemGovernment of India Act, 1935
Features borrowed from GoI Act, 1935Federal scheme, distribution of powers (Union/State/Concurrent Lists — indirectly), office of Governor, judiciary structure, Public Service Commissions, emergency provisions
Why GoI Act 1935’s federation didn’t fully materializePrincely States refused to join the proposed All-India Federation
Other colonial Acts (for comparison)Government of India Act, 1919 – introduced Dyarchy in provinces; Indian Councils Act, 1909 (Morley-Minto Reforms) – introduced separate electorates; Indian Independence Act, 1947 – granted independence and partition

10. The word “secularism” was added to the Preamble of the Constitution of India by which amendment?

(A) 40th
(B) 42nd
(C) 44th
(D) 46th

Answer: (B) 42nd

Explanation: The word “Secular” was inserted into the Preamble of the Indian Constitution by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976. This amendment changed the description of India from “Sovereign Democratic Republic” to “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic,” explicitly affirming India’s secular character — meaning the State treats all religions equally and maintains no official state religion, while allowing individuals the freedom to practice, propagate, and profess any religion of their choice.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976
Word added“Secular” (along with “Socialist” and “Integrity”)
Original Preamble wording“Sovereign Democratic Republic”
Amended Preamble wording“Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic”
Meaning of secularism in Indian contextState has no official religion; treats all religions equally; ensures freedom of religion for all citizens (Articles 25–28)
Enacted duringNational Emergency (1975–77), under PM Indira Gandhi
Related constitutional Articles on religionArticles 25–28 (Right to Freedom of Religion, Part III)

11. The Concurrent list in the Constitution of India was adopted from

(A) Australia
(B) Canada
(C) Russia
(D) UK

Answer: (A) Australia

Explanation: The Concurrent List (List III in the Seventh Schedule) — which allows both the Union Parliament and State Legislatures to legislate on the same subjects such as education, forests, marriage and divorce, and criminal law — was borrowed from the Australian Constitution. This feature enables flexibility in governance by allowing states to legislate according to local conditions while the Union can ensure uniformity where necessary; in case of a conflict, the Union law generally prevails under Article 254, unless the State law has received the President’s assent.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ConceptConcurrent List (List III)
Source countryAustralia
LocationSeventh Schedule, List III
Conflict-resolution provisionArticle 254 – Union law prevails, unless State law has received Presidential assent
Sample subjectsEducation, Forests, Marriage & Divorce, Criminal Law & Procedure, Economic & Social Planning
Other borrowed features from Canada (for comparison)Quasi-federal system, strong Centre, residuary powers with the Union (Canada is a common distractor for federal-related questions)

12. The Constituent Assembly was set according to the proposals of

(A) The Cripps Mission
(B) The Cabinet Mission
(C) The Mountbatten Plan
(D) None of the Above

Answer: (B) The Cabinet Mission

Explanation: The Constituent Assembly of India was constituted in accordance with the proposals put forth by the Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946. The Cabinet Mission, comprising three British Cabinet ministers — Lord Pethick-Lawrence, Sir Stafford Cripps, and A.V. Alexander — visited India in 1946 to discuss and formulate a plan for the transfer of power. It proposed a scheme for electing members to a Constituent Assembly through indirect elections by the members of the Provincial Legislative Assemblies, along with representation from the Princely States. This led to the formation of the 389-member Constituent Assembly, which first met on 9th December 1946.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Basis of Constituent Assembly’s formationCabinet Mission Plan, 1946
Members of Cabinet MissionLord Pethick-Lawrence, Sir Stafford Cripps, A. V. Alexander
Original Constituent Assembly strength389 members
Method of electionIndirect election by Provincial Legislative Assembly members + nomination from Princely States
First meeting date9th December 1946
Cripps Mission (different, earlier event)1942 mission led by Sir Stafford Cripps alone, proposing Dominion Status — rejected by Congress (“post-dated cheque” remark by Gandhi); did NOT create the Constituent Assembly
Mountbatten Plan (different, later event)June 1947 plan that led to Partition and transfer of power, not the formation of the Constituent Assembly

13. The Constitution of India describes India as a

(A) Federation of Independent States
(B) Union of States
(C) Quasi federation
(D) Dominion of States

Answer: (B) Union of States

Explanation: This is the same concept tested earlier as Question 1 in the WBCS 2023 paper. Article 1 of the Constitution of India states, “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.” The framers deliberately chose the term “Union” instead of “Federation” to emphasize that the Indian federation was not formed by an agreement between the states (unlike the USA), and that no state has the right to secede from the Union — making it indestructible, even though it functions with a federal structure and division of powers between the Centre and States.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Constitutional ArticleArticle 1
Exact phrase“India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States”
Reason for “Union” over “Federation”Indicates the federation was not formed by agreement among states; no state can secede
Explained byDr. B. R. Ambedkar in Constituent Assembly debates
Scholarly description of India’s federal nature“Quasi-federal” (a term coined by K. C. Wheare) — this is a scholarly characterization, NOT the constitutional wording itself
Contrast with USAUS federation formed via voluntary agreement of independent, sovereign states

14. The word “procedure established by law” in the Constitution of India have been borrowed from

(A) The Constitution of UK
(B) The Constitution of USA
(C) The French Constitution
(D) The Constitution of Japan

Answer: (D) The Constitution of Japan

Explanation: The phrase “procedure established by law,” found in Article 21 of the Indian Constitution (Right to Life and Personal Liberty), was borrowed from the Constitution of Japan. This concept means that a person can be deprived of their life or personal liberty only through a procedure laid down by a validly enacted law, but it does not require that law to necessarily be “fair, just, and reasonable” (unlike the American doctrine of “due process of law,” which allows courts to examine both the substance and procedure of the law). Over time, through judicial interpretation — most notably in the Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978) case — the Indian judiciary has infused elements of due process into Article 21, requiring that the “procedure” itself be fair, just, and reasonable.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Phrase“Procedure established by law”
Source countryJapan
Constitutional ArticleArticle 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty)
Contrasting American doctrine“Due Process of Law” — allows courts to review both substance and procedure of law
Landmark case expanding Article 21Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978) — introduced due-process-like standards despite the original “procedure established by law” wording
Effect of Maneka Gandhi caseProcedure must now be “fair, just, and reasonable,” effectively narrowing the gap between the two doctrines

15. Who was the Chairman of the Constitution Drafting Committee ?

(A) Jawaharlal Nehru
(B) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(C) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(D) Sardar Vallabhai Patel

Answer: (B) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar

Explanation: Dr. B. R. Ambedkar was appointed as the Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Constituent Assembly, which was constituted on 29th August 1947. This committee was responsible for scrutinizing the draft Constitution prepared by the Constitutional Advisor (B. N. Rau) and preparing the final draft for consideration and adoption by the Constituent Assembly. Due to his pivotal role in shaping the Constitution’s final form, Dr. Ambedkar is widely regarded as the “Father of the Indian Constitution” or the “Chief Architect of the Indian Constitution.”

Notes:

AspectDetail
Chairman of Drafting CommitteeDr. B. R. Ambedkar
Date Drafting Committee constituted29th August 1947
Total members of Drafting Committee7 (including Ambedkar)
Other members of Drafting CommitteeN. Gopalaswami Ayyangar, Alladi Krishnaswamy Ayyar, Dr. K. M. Munshi, Syed Mohammad Saadullah, N. Madhava Rau (replaced B.L. Mitter), T. T. Krishnamachari (replaced D.P. Khaitan)
Popular title given to Ambedkar“Father of the Indian Constitution” / “Chief Architect of the Indian Constitution”
Permanent President of Constituent Assembly (different role)Dr. Rajendra Prasad
Constitutional Advisor (different role)B. N. Rau

16. Which of the following is not a feature of the Constitution of India ?

(A) It is democratic
(B) It is republic
(C) It is federal
(D) It is presidential

Answer: (D) It is presidential

Explanation: India follows a Parliamentary form of government, not a Presidential system. In a parliamentary system, the executive (Council of Ministers headed by the Prime Minister) is drawn from and remains responsible to the legislature (Parliament), and can be removed through a vote of no-confidence. This is in contrast to a presidential system (like the USA), where the executive (President) is elected separately from the legislature, serves a fixed term, and is not collectively responsible to the legislature. India is indeed democratic (government by the people), republic (elected Head of State, i.e., the President, rather than a hereditary monarch), and federal (division of powers between Centre and States) — but definitely not presidential.

Notes:

AspectDetail
India’s system of governmentParliamentary (not Presidential)
Source of parliamentary systemBritish Constitution
Key feature of parliamentary systemExecutive (PM & Council of Ministers) is drawn from and responsible to the Legislature (Lok Sabha)
Key feature of presidential system (for contrast)Executive (President) elected separately, fixed term, not responsible to legislature (e.g., USA)
Why India is “Republic”Head of State (President) is elected, not hereditary (unlike UK’s monarchy)
Why India is “Federal” (with unitary bias)Division of powers between Union and States via Union, State, and Concurrent Lists

17. The word “socialist” was added to the Preamble of the Constitution of India by which amendment?

(A) 44th
(B) 27th
(C) 21st
(D) 42nd

Answer: (D) 42nd

Explanation: The word “Socialist” was inserted into the Preamble of the Indian Constitution by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, along with the words “Secular” and “Integrity.” This amendment changed the Preamble’s description of India from “Sovereign Democratic Republic” to “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic,” reflecting the State’s commitment to reducing economic inequalities and pursuing a welfare-oriented, mixed-economy model, without necessarily adopting a purely communist or rigid state-controlled economic structure.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976
Word added“Socialist” (along with “Secular” and “Integrity”)
Original Preamble wording“Sovereign Democratic Republic”
Amended Preamble wording“Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic”
Indian “Socialism” interpretationDemocratic socialism — a mixed economy blending public and private sectors, welfare state, and reduction of inequality; not rigid state ownership like Communism
Enacted duringNational Emergency (1975–77), PM Indira Gandhi’s government

WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper – 2021

1. Which is the ‘Soul’ of the Indian Constitution ?

(A) Fundamental Rights
(B) Preamble
(C) both (i) and (ii)
(D) None of the above

Answer: (B) Preamble

Explanation: The Preamble to the Constitution of India is often referred to as the “Soul of the Constitution” because it encapsulates the fundamental values, philosophy, objectives, and ideals that the Constitution seeks to achieve. This famous characterization was given by N. A. Palkhivala, a renowned jurist and constitutional expert. Similarly, other notable descriptions include “Identity card of the Constitution” (also by Palkhivala) and “Key to the minds of the makers of the Constitution” (by Ernest Barker). The Preamble reflects the basic philosophy and fundamental values on which the entire Constitution is built, guiding its interpretation by courts.

Notes:

AspectDetail
“Soul of the Constitution”Preamble
Attributed toN. A. Palkhivala
Other famous descriptions of Preamble“Identity Card of the Constitution” (Palkhivala); “Key to the minds of the makers of the Constitution” (Ernest Barker); “Horoscope of the Constitution” (K. M. Munshi)
Legal status of PreambleConsidered part of the Constitution (as held in Kesavananda Bharati case, 1973); part of the Basic Structure Doctrine
Is Preamble enforceable in court?No, it is not directly enforceable, but is used as an interpretative tool
Fundamental Rights (for contrast)Sometimes called the “Conscience of the Constitution” or compared to the American Bill of Rights — but NOT specifically termed the “Soul”

2. Where are the words ‘Unity and Integrity of the Nation’ are found?

(A) Directive Principles of State Policy.
(B) Emergency Provisions
(C) Fundamental Duties
(D) Preamble

Answer: (D) Preamble

Explanation: The phrase “Unity and Integrity of the Nation” appears in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution, specifically within the “Fraternity” clause. The original 1950 Preamble spoke of promoting fraternity, assuring the dignity of the individual and the “unity of the Nation.” The word “Integrity” was added to this phrase by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, making it “unity and integrity of the Nation” — emphasizing not just the political unity but also the territorial and cultural integrity of India, especially significant given the diverse linguistic, religious, and regional composition of the country.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Phrase locationPreamble (under the “Fraternity” clause)
Original 1950 wording“…assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity of the Nation”
Amended wording (post-1976)“…assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation”
Amendment that added “Integrity”42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976
Other words added by same amendment“Socialist” and “Secular”

3. When was the First Amendment Bill passed?

(A) 1950
(B) 1952
(C) 1951
(D) 1954

Answer: (C) 1951

Explanation: The Constitution (First Amendment) Act was passed in 1951, just about a year after the Constitution came into effect on 26th January 1950. This amendment made several significant changes, including the addition of the Ninth Schedule (to protect land reform and zamindari abolition laws from judicial review), the insertion of Articles 31A and 31B, and it added reasonable restrictions to the freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(2) (relating to public order, friendly relations with foreign states, and incitement to an offence). It was necessitated primarily due to conflicts between the judiciary and the legislature over land reform laws.

Notes:

AspectDetail
AmendmentConstitution (First Amendment) Act
Year passed1951
Key additionsNinth Schedule (protects specified laws from judicial review); Articles 31A and 31B
Reason for amendmentConflicts between judiciary and legislature over land reform/zamindari abolition laws (courts were striking these down citing violation of Fundamental Rights)
Changes to Article 19Added reasonable restrictions on freedom of speech (public order, incitement to offence, friendly relations with foreign states)
Time gap from Constitution’s commencementAbout 1 year (Constitution came into force 26 Jan 1950; First Amendment passed 1951)

4. When was the Constitution of India enacted by the Constituent Assembly ?

(A) 26 January, 1950
(B) 26 November, 1949
(C) 26 January, 1949
(D) 20 January, 1949

Answer: (B) 26 November, 1949

Explanation: The Constitution of India was adopted and enacted by the Constituent Assembly on 26th November, 1949. This date is now commemorated as “Constitution Day” (also known as “Samvidhan Diwas”) in India. However, the Constitution did not come into force immediately upon adoption — most of its provisions came into effect two months later, on 26th January, 1950, a date chosen specifically to coincide with the anniversary of “Purna Swaraj” (complete independence), which had been declared by the Indian National Congress on 26th January, 1930.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Date of adoption/enactment by Constituent Assembly26th November, 1949
Commemorated asConstitution Day / Samvidhan Diwas
Date Constitution came into force26th January, 1950 (Republic Day)
Reason for choosing 26 January for commencementTo honor the “Purna Swaraj” declaration made by INC on 26 January 1930
Provisions that came into force immediately on 26 Nov 1949A few provisions (like citizenship, elections, provisional Parliament) took effect immediately; the bulk came into force on 26 Jan 1950

5. Where was the first Session of the Constituent Assembly held?

(A) Madras
(B) New Delhi
(C) Calcutta
(D) Bombay

Answer: (B) New Delhi

Explanation: The first session of the Constituent Assembly of India was held in New Delhi on 9th December, 1946, at the Constitution Hall (which is now known as the Central Hall of Parliament House). Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha, the oldest member present, was elected as the temporary/interim Chairman for this first sitting. Notably, members of the Muslim League boycotted this first session, as they were demanding a separate state (Pakistan) and did not wish to participate in a unified Constituent Assembly for undivided India.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Location of first sessionNew Delhi (Constitution Hall, now Central Hall of Parliament House)
Date of first session9th December, 1946
Temporary/interim ChairmanDr. Sachchidananda Sinha (oldest member present)
Permanent President (elected 2 days later)Dr. Rajendra Prasad
Boycotted byMuslim League members (demanding separate Pakistan)
Total sittings of Constituent Assembly11 sessions over nearly 3 years

6. Which of the following is not included in the Preamble ?

(A) Sovereign
(B) Socialist
(C) Democratic
(D) Federal

Answer: (D) Federal

Explanation: The word “Federal” does NOT appear in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution. The Preamble describes India as a “SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC,” but makes no explicit mention of India being “federal.” This is significant because, although India functions with a federal structure (division of powers between the Centre and States), the Constitution itself does not use the word “Federal” anywhere, including in Article 1, which instead describes India as a “Union of States.” India’s federal character is inferred from its structure and provisions, rather than being explicitly stated in the Preamble or the opening Article.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Words actually in the PreambleSovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic, Republic
Word NOT in the Preamble“Federal”
Where India’s federal nature is instead reflectedStructurally, through the distribution of powers (Union, State, Concurrent Lists) — not explicitly stated in the Preamble or Article 1
Article 1 wording (for context)“India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States” — again, no use of the word “Federal”
Scholarly descriptionK. C. Wheare called India’s Constitution “quasi-federal” — but this too is a scholarly label, not constitutional text

7. How many Schedules are there in the Constitution of India?

(A) 22
(B) 97
(C) 18
(D) 12

Answer: (D) 12

Explanation: The Constitution of India currently has 12 Schedules. It originally had 8 Schedules when adopted in 1950. Over the decades, four more schedules were added through various amendments: the Ninth Schedule (1st Amendment, 1951 — protects certain laws from judicial review), the Tenth Schedule (52nd Amendment, 1985 — Anti-Defection Law), the Eleventh Schedule (73rd Amendment, 1992 — Panchayats), and the Twelfth Schedule (74th Amendment, 1992 — Municipalities), bringing the total to 12.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Current number of Schedules12
Original number (1950)8
Ninth Schedule added by1st Amendment Act, 1951
Tenth Schedule added by52nd Amendment Act, 1985 (Anti-Defection)
Eleventh Schedule added by73rd Amendment Act, 1992 (Panchayats)
Twelfth Schedule added by74th Amendment Act, 1992 (Municipalities)

8. When was the Indian Independence Act passed by the British Parliament?

(A) 18 July, 1947
(B) 20 July, 1947
(C) 18 July, 1946
(D) 20 July, 1946

Answer: (A) 18 July, 1947

Explanation: The Indian Independence Act, 1947 was passed by the British Parliament on 18th July, 1947, and it received royal assent on the same day. This Act formally provided for the creation of two independent dominions — India and Pakistan — effective from 15th August, 1947. It also ended British paramountcy over the Princely States, allowing them to choose whether to join India, Pakistan, or remain independent, and abolished the title “Emperor of India” held by the British monarch.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ActIndian Independence Act, 1947
Date passed by British Parliament18th July, 1947
Effective date (Independence)15th August, 1947
Key provisionsCreated two independent dominions — India and Pakistan; ended British paramountcy over Princely States; abolished title “Emperor of India”
Based onMountbatten Plan (3rd June Plan), 1947
Governor-General role after the ActContinued temporarily, with separate Governors-General for India and Pakistan (Lord Mountbatten became India’s first Governor-General post-independence)

9. The concept of ‘Liberty’ and ‘Fraternity’ in the Constitution of India was taken from

(A) Germany
(B) Russia
(C) France
(D) USA

Answer: (C) France

Explanation: The ideals of “Liberty” and “Fraternity,” along with “Equality,” enshrined in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution, were inspired by the French Revolution (1789), whose famous rallying cry was “Liberté, égalité, fraternité” (Liberty, Equality, Fraternity). These three ideals form the philosophical backbone of the Preamble’s vision for India, reflecting a commitment to individual freedom, social/legal equality, and a sense of common brotherhood and dignity among all citizens, transcending caste, creed, religion, and region.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ConceptsLiberty, Equality, Fraternity
SourceFrench Revolution (1789)
Original French slogan“Liberté, égalité, fraternité”
Where it appearsPreamble to the Indian Constitution
Liberty (meaning in Preamble)Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith, and worship
Equality (meaning in Preamble)Equality of status and opportunity
Fraternity (meaning in Preamble)Assuring dignity of the individual and unity/integrity of the nation
Other borrowed Preamble concepts (for comparison)Idea of a Preamble itself — USA; “Justice” (social, economic, political) — inspired by Russian Revolution ideals, per some scholars

10. Which Schedule contains “Forms of Oath & Affirmations”?

(A) Eleventh
(B) Third
(C) Fourth
(D) Fifth

Answer: (B) Third

Explanation: The Third Schedule of the Constitution of India lays down the various forms of Oaths or Affirmations to be taken by important constitutional functionaries — including Union Ministers, Members of Parliament, Judges of the Supreme Court, the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India, State Ministers, Members of State Legislatures, and Judges of High Courts — before they assume office.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ScheduleThird Schedule
Subject matterForms of Oaths or Affirmations
Functionaries coveredUnion Ministers, MPs, Supreme Court Judges, CAG, State Ministers, MLAs, High Court Judges
Notable exclusionsPresident’s oath (Article 60) and Governor’s oath (Article 159) are given directly in the Constitution’s articles, not the Third Schedule
Related schedules (for comparison)Fourth Schedule – Allocation of Rajya Sabha seats to States/UTs; Fifth Schedule – Administration of Scheduled Areas & Tribes; Eleventh Schedule – Panchayats

11. Who was the temporary President in the first meeting of the Constituent Assembly on 9 December, 1946?

(A) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(B) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(C) Dr. Sachchidanda Sinha
(D) B. N. Rau

Answer: (C) Dr. Sachchidanda Sinha

Explanation: Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha, being the oldest member present at the first sitting of the Constituent Assembly on 9th December, 1946, was elected as the temporary/interim (provisional) Chairman for that inaugural session, following a convention similar to that of appointing a “Pro-tem Speaker” in legislatures. He presided only over this first sitting. Two days later, on 11th December 1946, Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the permanent President of the Constituent Assembly, a position he held throughout the constitution-making process.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Temporary/interim Chairman (first sitting only)Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha
Reason for his selectionHe was the oldest member present (following convention similar to a “Pro-tem Speaker”)
Date of first sitting9th December, 1946
Permanent President electedDr. Rajendra Prasad, on 11th December 1946
Constitutional Advisor (different role)B. N. Rau
Chairman of Drafting Committee (different role)Dr. B. R. Ambedkar

12. When were the words “Socialist” and “Secular” added to the Preamble?

(A) 1970
(B) 1950
(C) 1981
(D) 1976

Answer: (D) 1976

Explanation: The words “Socialist” and “Secular” were inserted into the Preamble of the Indian Constitution by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, enacted during the period of National Emergency under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s government. Along with these two words, the term “Integrity” was also added in the Fraternity clause (“unity and integrity of the Nation”). Before this amendment, the Preamble described India only as a “Sovereign Democratic Republic.”

Notes:

AspectDetail
Year1976
Amendment42nd Constitutional Amendment Act
Words added“Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity”
Original (1950) Preamble wording“Sovereign Democratic Republic”
Amended Preamble wording (post-1976)“Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic”
Enacted duringNational Emergency (1975–1977), PM Indira Gandhi
Number of times Preamble has been amendedOnly once, in 1976

13. What is Article 5 of the Constitution of India related to?

(A) Fundamental Duties
(B) Voting
(C) Citizenship
(D) Formation of new states

Answer: (C) Citizenship

Explanation: Article 5 of the Indian Constitution falls under Part II (Citizenship) and deals with citizenship by domicile at the commencement of the Constitution. It specifies that a person who has their domicile in the territory of India, and who was either born in India, or has either of their parents born in India, or has been ordinarily resident in India for not less than five years immediately preceding the commencement of the Constitution, shall be a citizen of India as of 26th January 1950.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ArticleArticle 5
Part of ConstitutionPart II (Citizenship)
Subject matterCitizenship by domicile at the commencement of the Constitution
Conditions specifiedDomicile in India + (born in India, OR either parent born in India, OR ordinarily resident for at least 5 years before commencement)
Related Articles in Part IIArticle 6 – migrants from Pakistan; Article 7 – migrants to Pakistan; Article 8 – Persons of Indian origin residing outside India; Article 9 – Persons voluntarily acquiring foreign citizenship excluded; Article 11 – Parliament empowered to regulate citizenship by law
Resulting legislationCitizenship Act, 1955 (enacted using power under Article 11)

14. When was the Indian Citizenship Act enacted?

(A) 1960
(B) 1949
(C) 1950
(D) 1955

Answer: (D) 1955

Explanation: The Citizenship Act was enacted by the Parliament of India in 1955, exercising the power granted under Article 11 of the Constitution, which empowers Parliament to regulate the right of citizenship by law. While Part II of the Constitution (Articles 5–11) dealt with citizenship only at the commencement of the Constitution (26th January 1950), the Citizenship Act, 1955, provides for the acquisition and termination of citizenship after that date — covering methods such as birth, descent, registration, naturalization, and incorporation of territory. The Act has since been amended multiple times, notably in 1986, 2003, and 2019 (Citizenship Amendment Act).

Notes:

AspectDetail
ActCitizenship Act
Year enacted1955
Enabling constitutional provisionArticle 11 (Part II)
PurposeRegulates acquisition and termination of Indian citizenship after 26 January 1950
Modes of acquiring citizenship under the ActBirth, Descent, Registration, Naturalization, Incorporation of Territory
Notable subsequent amendments1986, 2003, and 2019 (Citizenship Amendment Act, CAA)
Constitutional Part covering citizenship at commencementPart II (Articles 5–11) — distinct from the 1955 Act, which covers post-1950 citizenship matters

15. The idea of ‘Single Citizenship’ was taken from which country?

(A) Russia
(B) France
(C) Ireland
(D) United Kingdom

Answer: (D) United Kingdom

Explanation: This is the same concept tested earlier as Question 30 in the WBCS 2023 paper. India follows the concept of “Single Citizenship,” meaning every Indian, regardless of the state they belong to, is a citizen of India as a whole, with no separate state citizenship (unlike the USA’s dual citizenship model). This concept was borrowed from the British Constitution, and is intended to promote national unity and prevent regional discrimination, despite India’s federal structure with multiple states.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ConceptSingle Citizenship
Source countryUnited Kingdom
MeaningEvery Indian is a citizen of India only, not separately of any state
Contrast (Dual Citizenship)USA — citizens hold both national and separate state citizenship
Purpose in Indian contextPromotes national unity and integrity; prevents regional bias
Governing provisionsPart II (Articles 5–11) for citizenship at commencement; Citizenship Act, 1955 for subsequent regulation

16. When was the first meeting of the Constituent Assembly held?

(A) 9th December, 1945
(B) 9th December, 1946
(C) 9th December, 1947
(D) 9th December, 1948

Answer: (B) 9th December, 1946

Explanation: The first meeting (first session) of the Constituent Assembly of India was held on 9th December, 1946, at the Constitution Hall in New Delhi (now known as the Central Hall of Parliament House). Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha, being the oldest member present, was elected as the temporary/interim Chairman for this inaugural sitting. The Muslim League boycotted this session, as they were demanding a separate Constituent Assembly for Pakistan. Two days later, on 11th December 1946, Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the permanent President of the Assembly.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Date of first meeting9th December, 1946
VenueConstitution Hall, New Delhi (now Central Hall of Parliament House)
Temporary ChairmanDr. Sachchidananda Sinha (oldest member present)
Permanent President (elected 2 days later)Dr. Rajendra Prasad, on 11th December 1946
Boycotted byMuslim League (demanding separate Pakistan)
Basis of Assembly’s formationCabinet Mission Plan, 1946

17. Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution deals with

(A) Panchayats
(B) Tribunals
(C) Rajya Sabha
(D) List of Recognized Languages

Answer: (D) List of Recognized Languages

Explanation: The Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution contains the list of officially recognized (scheduled) languages of India. Originally, in 1950, it had 14 languages; over time, through various amendments (21st Amendment in 1967, 71st Amendment in 1992, and 92nd Amendment in 2003), more languages were added, bringing the current total to 22. This schedule serves as the basis for the development, promotion, and official use of these languages in various government functions, including translations and competitive examinations.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ScheduleEighth Schedule
Subject matterList of recognized/scheduled languages of India
Original number of languages (1950)14
Current number of languages22
Key amendments adding languages21st (1967) – Sindhi; 71st (1992) – Konkani, Manipuri, Nepali; 92nd (2003) – Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, Santhali
Related schedules (for comparison)Eleventh Schedule – Panchayats (73rd Amendment); Twelfth Schedule – Municipalities (74th Amendment); Fourth Schedule – Allocation of Rajya Sabha seats

18. The States were reorganized in the year 1956 mainly on the basis of

(A) Linguistic and Cultural uniformity.
(B) Administration facility.
(C) Geographic similarity.
(D) Administrative uniformity.

Answer: (A) Linguistic and Cultural uniformity

Explanation: This is the same concept tested earlier as Question 22 in the WBCS 2023 paper. The States Reorganisation Act, 1956, based on the recommendations of the States Reorganisation Commission (SRC) headed by Fazl Ali (with members H.N. Kunzru and K.M. Panikkar), redrew state boundaries mainly on the basis of linguistic and cultural uniformity. This was largely in response to widespread linguistic movements across India, most prominently the agitation for a separate Telugu-speaking Andhra State, which had already led to the formation of Andhra Pradesh in 1953 following Potti Sriramulu’s fast-unto-death.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ActStates Reorganisation Act, 1956
Basis of reorganizationLinguistic and cultural uniformity
CommissionStates Reorganisation Commission (SRC), 1953
ChairmanFazl Ali
Other membersH. N. Kunzru, K. M. Panikkar
Trigger eventFormation of Andhra State (1953) following Potti Sriramulu’s fast-unto-death
ResultIndia reorganized into 14 states and 6 Union Territories
Earlier opposing commissionsDhar Commission (1948) and JVP Committee (1948–49) initially opposed linguistic states, but public pressure changed the approach

19. Which is not a condition for becoming a citizen of India ?

(A) Naturalization
(B) Birth
(C) Descent
(D) Acquiring Property

Answer: (D) Acquiring Property

Explanation: Under the Citizenship Act, 1955, Indian citizenship can be acquired through five recognized methods: Birth, Descent, Registration, Naturalization, and Incorporation of Territory. Merely “Acquiring Property” in India is NOT a recognized mode of gaining Indian citizenship — owning land or property in India does not automatically grant a person citizenship rights. This is an important distinction, especially since some countries do grant residency or citizenship-related benefits based on property investment (a concept sometimes called “Golden Visa” schemes elsewhere), but India’s Citizenship Act does not recognize this method.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Recognized modes of acquiring Indian citizenshipBirth, Descent, Registration, Naturalization, Incorporation of Territory
NOT a recognized modeAcquiring Property
Governing ActCitizenship Act, 1955
Enabling constitutional ArticleArticle 11 (empowers Parliament to regulate citizenship)
Naturalization (meaning)Citizenship granted to a foreigner after fulfilling specified conditions (e.g., residency period, good character)
Incorporation of Territory (meaning)When new territory becomes part of India, its residents may acquire Indian citizenship (e.g., Goa, Sikkim, Puducherry after their integration)

20. From where has been the concept of Fundamental Rights taken?

(A) USSR
(B) USA
(C) France
(D) Britain

Answer: (B) USA

Explanation: The concept of Fundamental Rights (Part III of the Indian Constitution) was borrowed from the Constitution of the United States of America, specifically from the American Bill of Rights. These are justiciable rights, meaning citizens can directly approach the courts (Supreme Court under Article 32, or High Courts under Article 226) for their enforcement if violated. This differs from the British model, which relies on parliamentary sovereignty and unwritten conventions rather than an explicitly codified, enforceable bill of rights.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ConceptFundamental Rights
Source countryUSA (American Bill of Rights)
Location in ConstitutionPart III (Articles 12–35)
Enforcement mechanismArticle 32 (Supreme Court) and Article 226 (High Courts) — “Right to Constitutional Remedies,” called the “Heart and Soul” of the Constitution by Ambedkar
Nature of Fundamental RightsJusticiable (enforceable by courts), unlike Directive Principles which are non-justiciable
Contrast with BritainUK lacks a codified, enforceable bill of rights; relies on parliamentary sovereignty and conventions
Other USA-inspired features (for comparison)Judicial Review, Independence of Judiciary, Post of Vice-President, Impeachment procedure of President

21. Who was the Chairman of the Drafting Committee ?

(A) Tej Bahadur Sapru
(B) Rajendra Prasad
(C) C. Rajagopalachari
(D) B. R. Ambedkar

Answer: (D) B. R. Ambedkar

Explanation: This is the same concept tested earlier as Question 15 in the WBCS 2022 paper. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar was appointed as the Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Constituent Assembly, which was constituted on 29th August 1947. This seven-member committee was responsible for scrutinizing the draft prepared by the Constitutional Advisor, B. N. Rau, and preparing the final draft Constitution for the Constituent Assembly’s consideration. Due to his monumental contribution in shaping and finalizing the Constitution, Dr. Ambedkar is popularly known as the “Father of the Indian Constitution.”

Notes:

AspectDetail
Chairman of Drafting CommitteeDr. B. R. Ambedkar
Date Drafting Committee constituted29th August 1947
Total members of Drafting Committee7
Other membersN. Gopalaswami Ayyangar, Alladi Krishnaswamy Ayyar, Dr. K. M. Munshi, Syed Mohammad Saadullah, N. Madhava Rau, T. T. Krishnamachari
Popular title for Ambedkar“Father of the Indian Constitution”
Permanent President of Constituent Assembly (different role)Dr. Rajendra Prasad
Constitutional Advisor (different role)B. N. Rau

WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper – 2020

1. The Preamble of the Indian Constitution was inspired by the Preamble of the Constitution of which country ?

(A) U.S. Constitution
(B) Swiss Constitution
(C) British Constitution
(D) Constitution of Canada

Answer: (A) U.S. Constitution

Explanation: The idea of having a Preamble — a brief introductory statement outlining the guiding philosophy, purpose, and source of authority of the Constitution — was borrowed from the Constitution of the United States of America. The Indian Preamble’s opening phrase, “WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA…”, closely mirrors the US Preamble’s “We the People of the United States…”, reflecting that ultimate sovereignty rests with the people of India.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Source of inspirationUnited States (US) Constitution
Opening phrase of Indian Preamble“WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA…”
Opening phrase of US Preamble“We the People of the United States…”
SignificanceEstablishes that sovereignty and authority of the Constitution flow from the people of India
Constitutional status of PreamblePart of the Basic Structure Doctrine (Kesavananda Bharati case, 1973)
AmendabilityAmended only once so far (42nd Amendment, 1976)

2. The Constitution (Ninety-second Amendment) Act, 2003, amended the Eighth schedule to the Constitution so as to include Bodo, Dogri, Maithili and Santhali languages, thereby raising the total number of languages listed in the schedule to

(A) 20
(B) 21
(C) 22
(D) 23

Answer: (C) 22

Explanation: The Constitution (Ninety-second Amendment) Act, 2003, added four languages — Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, and Santhali — to the Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution. Before this amendment, the Eighth Schedule contained 18 languages (14 original + Sindhi added by the 21st Amendment in 1967 + Konkani, Manipuri, and Nepali added by the 71st Amendment in 1992). With the addition of these four languages in 2003, the total number of scheduled languages became 22, which remains the current total to this day.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment92nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2003
Languages addedBodo, Dogri, Maithili, Santhali
Number of languages before this amendment18
Number of languages after this amendment22 (current total)
Full timeline of Eighth Schedule expansion1950 – 14 languages (original); 1967 (21st Amendment) – added Sindhi (15 total); 1992 (71st Amendment) – added Konkani, Manipuri, Nepali (18 total); 2003 (92nd Amendment) – added Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, Santhali (22 total, current)

3. The Preamble to the Indian Constitution has been amended and the terms ‘Socialist’, ‘Secular’ and ‘Integrity’ have been added by which Amendment Act ? Choose the correct option.

(A) 42nd Amendment Act
(B) 43rd Amendment Act
(C) 45th Amendment Act
(D) 46th Amendment Act

Answer: (A) 42nd Amendment Act

Explanation: This is the same recurring concept tested multiple times across WBCS papers (2023 Q9, 2022 Q10 & Q17, 2021 Q2 & Q12). The Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, added the words “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity” to the Preamble of the Indian Constitution. This amendment was enacted during the National Emergency period (1975–1977) under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s government and remains the only amendment ever made to the Preamble’s text.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976
Words added to Preamble“Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity”
Original (1950) Preamble wording“Sovereign Democratic Republic…unity of the Nation”
Amended Preamble wording“Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic…unity and integrity of the Nation”
Enacted duringNational Emergency (1975–1977), PM Indira Gandhi
Number of times Preamble amendedOnly once (1976)

4. Who is known as the Father of the Indian Constitution ?

(A) Jawaharlal Nehru
(B) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(C) Alladi Krishna Swami Ayyar
(D) Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan

Answer: (B) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar

Explanation: Dr. B. R. Ambedkar is popularly known as the “Father of the Indian Constitution” due to his pivotal and monumental role as the Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Constituent Assembly. He was primarily responsible for meticulously scrutinizing, refining, and finalizing the draft Constitution before it was presented to and adopted by the Constituent Assembly. His deep legal expertise, along with his strong advocacy for social justice, equality, and the rights of marginalized communities, significantly shaped the final structure and content of the Constitution.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Title“Father of the Indian Constitution”
PersonDr. B. R. Ambedkar
Role heldChairman of the Drafting Committee (constituted 29 August 1947)
Other significant roles of AmbedkarIndia’s first Law Minister; strong advocate for social justice and rights of Dalits/marginalized communities
Permanent President of Constituent Assembly (different role)Dr. Rajendra Prasad
Objective Resolution mover (different role)Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru
Constitutional Advisor (different role)B. N. Rau
Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (for context)Philosopher-statesman; became India’s first Vice-President and later second President — not directly linked to Constitution drafting

5. In which year did Goa became the 25th State of India ?

(A) 1987
(B) 1988
(C) 1989
(D) 1990

Answer: (A) 1987

Explanation: Goa, along with Daman and Diu, was liberated from Portuguese colonial rule in 1961 and initially administered as a Union Territory. On 30th May 1987, through the Goa, Daman and Diu Reorganisation Act, 1987, Goa was granted full statehood, becoming the 25th State of the Indian Union, while Daman and Diu continued as a separate Union Territory.

Notes:

AspectDetail
EventGoa attained full statehood
Year1987 (specifically 30th May 1987)
Governing ActGoa, Daman and Diu Reorganisation Act, 1987
Sequence in Indian Union25th State of India
Prior statusUnion Territory (from 1961, after liberation from Portuguese rule)
BifurcationDaman and Diu remained a separate Union Territory
Related factMizoram (23rd state) and Arunachal Pradesh (24th state) both attained statehood on 20 February 1987, shortly before Goa’s statehood on 30 May 1987

6. Which part of the Constitution of India describes citizenship at the commencement of the Constitution ?

(A) Part I
(B) Part II
(C) Part III
(D) Part IV

Answer: (B) Part II

Explanation: Part II of the Constitution of India, comprising Articles 5 to 11, deals with citizenship at the commencement of the Constitution (26th January 1950). It covers various categories of persons who became citizens of India at that time, including those domiciled in India, migrants from and to Pakistan, persons of Indian origin residing abroad, and those who voluntarily acquired foreign citizenship (thereby losing Indian citizenship). Article 11 further empowers Parliament to make laws regulating citizenship thereafter, which led to the enactment of the Citizenship Act, 1955.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Part of ConstitutionPart II
Articles coveredArticle 5 to Article 11
Subject matterCitizenship at the commencement of the Constitution (26 January 1950)
Article 5Citizenship by domicile at commencement
Article 6Rights of citizenship of certain persons who migrated from Pakistan
Article 7Rights of citizenship of certain migrants to Pakistan
Article 8Rights of citizenship of certain persons of Indian origin residing outside India
Article 9Persons voluntarily acquiring foreign citizenship not to be citizens
Article 11Empowers Parliament to regulate citizenship by law (led to Citizenship Act, 1955)

7. Choose the correct answer :

(A) The Constituent Assembly of India took about one year to complete its work.
(B) The Constituent Assembly of India took about two years to complete its work.
(C) The Constituent Assembly of India took about three years to complete its work .
(D) The Constituent Assembly of India took about four years to complete its work.

Answer: (C) The Constituent Assembly of India took about three years to complete its work.

Explanation: The Constituent Assembly of India held its first session on 9th December 1946 and completed its work with the adoption of the Constitution on 26th November 1949. This spans a period of approximately 2 years, 11 months, and 18 days — commonly rounded off and referred to as “about three years” in most exam contexts. During this time, the Assembly held 11 sessions spread over 165 days, carefully deliberating on and drafting each provision of the Constitution.

Notes:

AspectDetail
First session9th December 1946
Constitution adopted26th November 1949
Exact duration2 years, 11 months, 18 days
Commonly rounded to“About 3 years”
Total sessions held11
Total days of sitting165 days
Constitution came into force26th January 1950 (about 2 months after adoption)

8. Who is known as the Father of the Lok Sabha ?

(A) G.V. Mavalankar
(B) Rabi Ray
(C) Balram Jakhar
(D) P. A. Sangma

Answer: (A) G.V. Mavalankar

Explanation: Ganesh Vasudev Mavalankar (G.V. Mavalankar) is popularly known as the “Father of the Lok Sabha” because he served as the first Speaker of the Lok Sabha (the Lower House of the Indian Parliament) after independence. He had earlier also served as the Speaker of the Central Legislative Assembly (the pre-independence legislature) and later as the Speaker of the Provisional Parliament before India’s first general elections. His long tenure and foundational role in establishing parliamentary conventions and procedures for the Lok Sabha earned him this honorary title.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Title“Father of the Lok Sabha”
PersonG. V. Mavalankar
RoleFirst Speaker of the Lok Sabha (independent India)
Earlier roleSpeaker of the Central Legislative Assembly (pre-independence) and Provisional Parliament
Tenure as Lok Sabha Speaker1952–1956
SignificanceEstablished many parliamentary conventions and procedures still followed today
Other Speakers mentioned (for contrast)Balram Jakhar – longest-serving Lok Sabha Speaker (two terms, 1980–89); Rabi Ray – Speaker during 1989–91; P. A. Sangma – Speaker during 1996–98

9. Which Amendment Act made Sikkim a full-fledged state of India ?

(A) 34th Constitutional Amendment Act
(B) 35th Constitutional Amendment Act
(C) 36th Constitutional Amendment Act
(D) 37th Constitutional Amendment Act

Answer: (C) 36th Constitutional Amendment Act

Explanation: Sikkim’s integration with India happened in two stages: first, the 35th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1974, granted Sikkim the status of an “Associate State” of India (inserting Article 2A and a since-repealed Tenth Schedule dealing with Sikkim’s terms of association). Following a referendum in April 1975, where the people of Sikkim voted to merge with India and abolish the monarchy, the 36th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1975, granted Sikkim full statehood, making it the 22nd State of the Indian Union.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment granting full statehood36th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1975
Prior step: Associate State statusGranted by 35th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1974
ReferendumHeld in April 1975; people voted to merge with India, abolishing monarchy
Article dealing with Sikkim’s special provisionsArticle 371F
Sequence in Indian Union22nd State of India
Political contextEnd of Chogyal (monarchical) rule in Sikkim

10. Fill in the blank : In India the concept of single citizenship is adopted from _____.

(A) The French Constitution
(B) The Swiss Constitution
(C) The Constitution of United States of America
(D) The British Constitution

Answer: (D) The British Constitution

Explanation: India follows the concept of “Single Citizenship,” meaning every Indian citizen, regardless of the state they reside in or belong to, is a citizen of India as a whole — there is no separate state-level citizenship (unlike the USA’s dual citizenship system). This concept was borrowed from the British Constitution to promote national unity and prevent regional discrimination among citizens, despite India’s federal structure comprising multiple states.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ConceptSingle Citizenship
Source countryUnited Kingdom
MeaningEvery Indian is a citizen of India only, with no separate state citizenship
Contrast (Dual Citizenship)USA — citizens hold both national and state-level citizenship
Purpose in Indian contextPromotes national unity and integrity; avoids regional discrimination
Governing provisionsPart II (Articles 5–11); Citizenship Act, 1955
Other features borrowed from UK (for comparison)Parliamentary system, Rule of Law, Cabinet system, Bicameralism, Prerogative writs

11. When was the Indian Constitution first adopted ?

(A) The Constituent Assembly adopted the Constitution of India on 26th January, 1950.
(B) The Constituent Assembly adopted the Constitution of India on 26th January, 1949.
(C) The Constitution of India was adopted by the Constituent Assembly on 26th November, 1949 .
(D) The Constitution of India was adopted on 26th November, 1948.

Answer: (C) The Constitution of India was adopted by the Constituent Assembly on 26th November, 1949.

Explanation: The Constitution of India was formally adopted by the Constituent Assembly on 26th November, 1949 — a date now commemorated as “Constitution Day” or “Samvidhan Diwas.” However, the Constitution did not come into force immediately; most of its provisions took effect two months later, on 26th January, 1950, chosen specifically to mark the anniversary of the “Purna Swaraj” declaration made by the Indian National Congress on 26th January, 1930.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Date of adoption26th November, 1949
Commemorated asConstitution Day / Samvidhan Diwas
Date of commencement (coming into force)26th January, 1950 (Republic Day)
Reason for choosing 26 JanuaryTo honor the “Purna Swaraj” declaration by INC on 26 January 1930
Provisions effective immediately upon adoptionA few (citizenship, elections, provisional Parliament); most others took effect only from 26 Jan 1950

12. Which is the longest written constitution in the world ?

(A) The Constitution of the United States
(B) The Constitution of India
(C) The Constitution of the Fifth Republic of France
(D) The Constitution of Switzerland

Answer: (B) The Constitution of India

Explanation: The Constitution of India is widely recognized as the longest written constitution of any sovereign country in the world. It originally contained 395 Articles, 22 Parts, and 8 Schedules when adopted in 1950, and has since grown further through numerous amendments to approximately 448 Articles and 12 Schedules. This extensive length is due to the framers’ attempt to incorporate detailed provisions covering a vast range of subjects — including administrative details, federal structure, fundamental rights, and directive principles — to avoid ambiguity in a large, diverse, and complex nation like India.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Longest written constitution in the worldConstitution of India
Original length (1950)395 Articles, 22 Parts, 8 Schedules
Current length (approx., after amendments)~448 Articles, 25 Parts, 12 Schedules
Reason for its lengthFramers aimed to cover extensive administrative detail, given India’s size, diversity, and complexity; borrowed provisions from multiple other constitutions and adapted them
Contrast — shortest written constitutionConstitution of the United States (originally just 7 Articles, with amendments added later)
Other constitutions mentioned (for context)France’s Fifth Republic Constitution (1958) and Switzerland’s Constitution are comparatively much shorter and more concise

13. Choose the correct statement stated in the Constitution of India :

(A) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Federation of States.
(B) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States .
(C) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Quasi federal State.
(D) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Unitary State.

Answer: (B) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.

Explanation: Article 1 of the Constitution of India explicitly states, “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.” The framers, particularly Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, deliberately chose the term “Union” over “Federation” to convey two key ideas: first, that the Indian federation was not formed by an agreement among previously independent states (unlike the USA), and second, that no state has the right to secede from the Union, making it indestructible despite functioning with a federal structure of governance.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Constitutional ArticleArticle 1
Exact phrase“India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States”
Reason for “Union” over “Federation”Federation not formed by agreement between states; no state has right to secede
Explained byDr. B. R. Ambedkar in Constituent Assembly debates
Scholarly description of India’s federalism“Quasi-federal” (coined by K. C. Wheare) — an academic label, not the actual constitutional wording

WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper – 2019

1. For the first time, which Constitutional Amendment made it clear that ‘State’ in clauses (a) to (e) of Article 3 of the Constitution includes ‘Union Territories’?

(A) 17th
(B) 18th
(C) 19th
(D) 20th

Answer: (B) 18th

Explanation: The Constitution (Eighteenth Amendment) Act, 1966, clarified and expanded the scope of Article 3, which deals with the formation of new states and alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing states. This amendment explicitly added an explanation to Article 3, making it clear that the term “State” used in clauses (a) to (e) of the Article also includes “Union Territories.” This meant that Parliament could similarly form new Union Territories, alter their boundaries, or change their names using the same procedure applicable to states, without requiring a more cumbersome constitutional amendment process for each such change.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment18th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1966
Article affectedArticle 3 (Formation of new states; alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing states)
Key clarification added“State” in clauses (a) to (e) of Article 3 also includes “Union Territories”
Practical effectParliament can form/alter Union Territories using the same simplified procedure as for States (by simple majority, not the more stringent Article 368 special majority)
Article 3 clauses covered(a) formation of new states, (b) increase/decrease of state area, (c) alteration of boundaries, (d) alteration of names, (e) related definitional matters
Procedure to amend Article 3 lawsRequires only a simple majority in Parliament (President’s prior recommendation + reference to concerned State Legislature for its views, though not binding)

2. Which of the following Articles describe about the person voluntarily acquiring citizenship of a foreign state not to be citizens?

(A) Article 5
(B) Article 6
(C) Article 7
(D) Article 9

Answer: (D) Article 9

Explanation: Article 9 of the Indian Constitution, falling under Part II (Citizenship), states that if a person has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign state, they shall NOT be considered a citizen of India. This provision reinforces India’s concept of Single Citizenship, meaning a person cannot simultaneously hold Indian citizenship and the citizenship of another country by their own choice (India generally does not recognize dual citizenship, though it does offer the separate status of “Overseas Citizen of India” (OCI), which is not equivalent to full citizenship).

Notes:

AspectDetail
ArticleArticle 9
Part of ConstitutionPart II (Citizenship)
Subject matterPersons who voluntarily acquire citizenship of a foreign state shall not be citizens of India
Related Articles in Part IIArticle 5 – citizenship by domicile; Article 6 – migrants from Pakistan; Article 7 – migrants to Pakistan; Article 8 – Persons of Indian origin residing outside India; Article 11 – Parliament’s power to regulate citizenship
Related conceptIndia’s policy of Single Citizenship (no dual citizenship)

3. The Constitution of India has borrowed its federal scheme of ‘Union of States’ from which country?

(A) United States of America
(B) Canada
(C) Ireland
(D) Russia

Answer: (B) Canada

Explanation: The concept and terminology of “Union of States,” along with a strong Centre relative to the States (where residuary powers rest with the Union rather than the States), was borrowed from the Canadian Constitution. Canada’s federal model was seen as more suitable for India’s needs at the time of independence, given concerns about national unity and integration of diverse regions and princely states. Unlike the American federal model (where states are more autonomous and came together voluntarily), Canada’s model emphasizes a strong central government, which aligned with India’s requirement for greater national cohesion.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Feature“Union of States” federal scheme with strong Centre
Source countryCanada
Key similarity to Canadian modelResiduary powers vested with the Union/Centre (not the States), unlike the USA where residuary powers rest with States
Constitutional reflectionArticle 1 – “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States”
Contrast with USA’s federal modelIn the USA, federation was formed by voluntary agreement between independent states; states retain more autonomy and residuary powers

4. When the name of a State is changed or a new State is created , the Constitution is required to be amended by the Parliament by a

(A) simple majority as required under Articles 107and 108
(B) majority of total members of both the Houses under Article 368.
(C) special majority under Article 368.
(D) special majority after obtaining the opinion of the concerned State Legislature under Article 3.

Answer: (A) simple majority as required under Articles 107 and 108

Explanation: Under Article 3 of the Constitution, Parliament can form new states, alter the areas, boundaries, or names of existing states through a simple legislative process — treated like an ordinary law, requiring only a simple majority of members present and voting, as per the general legislative procedure outlined in Articles 107 and 108 (which deal with the ordinary process of passing bills in Parliament). While the President must first recommend such a bill and refer it to the concerned State Legislature for its views, the State Legislature’s opinion is NOT binding on Parliament, and no special majority (as required for constitutional amendments under Article 368) is needed for such changes.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Governing Article for creation/renaming of StatesArticle 3
Type of majority requiredSimple majority (as per ordinary legislative procedure under Articles 107 & 108)
Role of PresidentMust recommend the bill before introduction in Parliament
Role of concerned State LegislatureMust be consulted for its views, but the opinion is NOT binding on Parliament
Contrast with Article 368 (constitutional amendments)Requires special majority (2/3rd of members present & voting + majority of total membership), and for certain provisions, ratification by half the states
Why Article 3 changes are treated as ordinary lawThis reflects India’s “Union of States” character — the Centre has significant power over state boundaries, unlike a more rigid federal system

5. National Capital Territory of Delhi was constituted by

(A) Ordinance promulgated by the Lieutenant Governor.
(B) Ordinance promulgated by the President.
(C) 71st Amendment.
(D) 69th Amendment.

Answer: (D) 69th Amendment

Explanation: The Constitution (Sixty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1991, inserted Articles 239AA and 239AB into the Constitution, granting Delhi the special status of “National Capital Territory of Delhi” (NCT of Delhi), along with its own Legislative Assembly and a Council of Ministers headed by a Chief Minister. However, certain critical subjects — Police, Public Order, and Land — remain under the control of the Union Government, administered through the Lieutenant Governor.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment69th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1991
Articles insertedArticle 239AA and 239AB
New nomenclatureNational Capital Territory of Delhi (NCT of Delhi)
Key provisionsLegislative Assembly for Delhi; Council of Ministers headed by Chief Minister
Subjects excluded from Delhi Assembly’s controlPublic Order, Police, and Land (remain with Union Government)
Administrative headLieutenant Governor (represents the Union Government)
Related ActGovernment of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act, 1991

6. By virtue of its special status , the State of Jammu & Kashmir has a separate

(A) Constitution
(B) defence force
(C) judiciary
(D) All of the above

Answer: (A) Constitution

Explanation: Historically, prior to August 2019, Jammu and Kashmir enjoyed special status under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, which allowed it to have its own separate state Constitution (the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, which came into force on 26th January 1957). This was a unique privilege not enjoyed by any other Indian state, all of which are governed only by the single Constitution of India. However, J&K did NOT have a separate defence force or a fully separate judiciary system independent of India’s judicial hierarchy — the Supreme Court of India’s jurisdiction extended to J&K as well, and national defence remained solely under the Union Government’s control. Note: This question reflects the constitutional position as it existed before the abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019, after which J&K’s separate constitution ceased to exist and it was reorganized into two Union Territories.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Special provision (historical)Article 370
J&K’s separate ConstitutionCame into force on 26th January 1957; ceased after August 2019
Did J&K have separate defence force?No — national defence remained under the Union Government
Did J&K have a fully separate judiciary?No — Supreme Court of India’s jurisdiction extended to J&K
Major change in 2019Article 370 abrogated (5 August 2019); J&K’s separate Constitution ceased to exist; state reorganized into two Union Territories — Jammu & Kashmir, and Ladakh (effective 31 October 2019)

7. The Indian Independence Act, 1947 ,came into force on

(A) 3rd June, 1947
(B) 18th July, 1947
(C) 26th July, 1947
(D) 14th August, 1947

Answer: (D) 14th August, 1947

Explanation: While the Indian Independence Act, 1947, was passed by the British Parliament and received royal assent on 18th July, 1947, the Act itself came into force/effect on 14th/15th August, 1947, formally creating the two independent dominions of India and Pakistan. Pakistan’s independence was marked at midnight on 14th August 1947, while India’s independence was celebrated on 15th August, 1947. The date 3rd June, 1947, refers to Lord Mountbatten’s Plan (the “3rd June Plan” or Mountbatten Plan), which first proposed the partition scheme that was later formalized through the Indian Independence Act.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Act passed by British Parliament18th July, 1947
Act came into force / effective date14th/15th August, 1947
Pakistan’s independenceMidnight, 14th August 1947
India’s independence15th August, 1947
Mountbatten Plan (precursor to the Act)3rd June, 1947 — first announced the partition proposal
Key provisions of the ActCreated two independent dominions (India & Pakistan); ended British paramountcy over Princely States; abolished title “Emperor of India”

8. The first session of the Constituent Assembly was held on

(A) 15th August, 1947
(B) 26th January, 1946
(C) 9th December, 1946
(D) 26th November, 1949

Answer: (C) 9th December, 1946

Explanation: The first session of the Constituent Assembly of India was held on 9th December, 1946, at the Constitution Hall in New Delhi (now the Central Hall of Parliament House). Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha, the oldest member present, served as the temporary/interim Chairman for this inaugural sitting, before Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the permanent President two days later, on 11th December 1946.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Date of first session9th December, 1946
VenueConstitution Hall, New Delhi (now Central Hall of Parliament House)
Temporary ChairmanDr. Sachchidananda Sinha
Permanent President (elected 2 days later)Dr. Rajendra Prasad, on 11th December 1946
Boycotted byMuslim League members (demanding separate Pakistan)
Basis of Assembly’s formationCabinet Mission Plan, 1946

9. The Constitution of India was adopted by the Constituent Assembly on

(A) 15th August, 1947
(B) 25th August, 1949
(C) 26th November, 1949
(D) 26th January, 1950

Answer: (C) 26th November, 1949

Explanation: The Constituent Assembly of India formally adopted the Constitution on 26th November, 1949 — a date now commemorated annually as “Constitution Day” or “Samvidhan Diwas.” The Constitution, however, came into force two months later, on 26th January, 1950, chosen specifically to mark the anniversary of the “Purna Swaraj” declaration made by the Indian National Congress on 26th January, 1930.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Date of adoption26th November, 1949
Commemorated asConstitution Day / Samvidhan Diwas
Date of commencement (coming into force)26th January, 1950 (Republic Day)
Reason for choosing 26 JanuaryTo honor the “Purna Swaraj” declaration by INC on 26 January 1930
15th August, 1947 (for context)Date of India’s Independence — unrelated to Constitution adoption

WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper – 2018

1. Which of the following sought to change the character of Indian Government from unitary to federal ?

(A) Indian Council Act, 1909
(B) Government of India Act, 1935
(C) Government of India Act, 1919
(D) Indian Independence Act, 1947

Answer: (B) Government of India Act, 1935

Explanation: The Government of India Act, 1935, was a landmark colonial-era legislation that sought to transform the character of Indian governance from a unitary system to a federal one. It proposed an All-India Federation comprising both British Indian provinces and the Princely States, with a clear division of subjects into three lists — Federal List, Provincial List, and Concurrent List — laying the groundwork for the federal structure later adopted in India’s Constitution. Although the proposed all-India federation never actually came into force (as the Princely States refused to join), the Act did introduce Provincial Autonomy, granting significant self-governing powers to the provinces, marking a genuine shift toward federalism.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ActGovernment of India Act, 1935
Key featureAttempted to shift India’s governance structure from unitary to federal
Structural changes proposedAll-India Federation (British provinces + Princely States); division of powers into Federal, Provincial, and Concurrent Lists
Why the federation failed to materializePrincely States refused to join
Feature that DID take effectProvincial Autonomy — provinces given significant self-governing powers
Other colonial Acts (for comparison)Indian Councils Act, 1909 (Morley-Minto Reforms) – introduced separate electorates, no federal shift; Government of India Act, 1919 (Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms) – introduced Dyarchy in provinces, still largely unitary; Indian Independence Act, 1947 – granted independence and partition, not primarily about federal structure

2. The Indian Constitution has borrowed the ideas of Preamble from the

(A) Canadian Constitution
(B) Italian Constitution
(C) French Constitution
(D) Constitution of USA

Answer: (D) Constitution of USA

Explanation: The idea of having a Preamble — a concise introductory statement expressing the guiding philosophy, objectives, and source of authority behind the Constitution — was borrowed from the Constitution of the United States of America. The Indian Preamble’s opening words, “WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA…”, closely echo the opening of the US Preamble, “We the People of the United States…”, signifying that the ultimate source of the Constitution’s authority is the people of India themselves.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Source of inspirationUnited States (US) Constitution
Opening phrase of Indian Preamble“WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA…”
Opening phrase of US Preamble“We the People of the United States…”
SignificanceEstablishes that sovereignty and authority flow from the people of India
Constitutional status of PreamblePart of the Basic Structure Doctrine (Kesavananda Bharati case, 1973)
AmendabilityAmended only once so far (42nd Amendment, 1976)

3. From which of the countries, Constitution of India has adopted fundamental duties ?

(A) USA
(B) UK
(C) Erstwhile USSR
(D) Canada

Answer: (C) Erstwhile USSR

Explanation: The concept of Fundamental Duties, incorporated in Part IVA (Article 51A) of the Indian Constitution by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976, was borrowed from the Constitution of the erstwhile Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). This addition was made on the recommendation of the Swaran Singh Committee, set up during the Emergency period to suggest constitutional amendments. Originally there were 10 Fundamental Duties, and an 11th duty was later added by the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ConceptFundamental Duties
Source countryErstwhile USSR (Russia)
Part & ArticlePart IVA, Article 51A
Introduced by42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976
Recommending committeeSwaran Singh Committee
Original number of duties10
Current number of duties11
11th duty added by86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002 (duty to provide education for children aged 6–14 years)
Nature of Fundamental DutiesNon-justiciable (not enforceable in courts)

4. The British, conceded the demand for partition of India under

(A) Cripps Mission
(B) Mountbatten Plan, 1947
(C) Simla Pact, 1946
(D) Cabinet Mission Plan

Answer: (B) Mountbatten Plan, 1947

Explanation: The Mountbatten Plan, announced on 3rd June, 1947 (also known as the “3rd June Plan”), was the formal proposal put forward by Lord Mountbatten, the last Viceroy of British India, under which the British Government officially conceded to the demand for the partition of India into two independent dominions — India and Pakistan. This plan was subsequently formalized and given legal effect through the Indian Independence Act, 1947, passed by the British Parliament on 18th July, 1947, leading to independence on 14th/15th August, 1947.

Notes:

AspectDetail
PlanMountbatten Plan, 1947 (also called “3rd June Plan”)
Date announced3rd June, 1947
Proposed byLord Mountbatten, last Viceroy of British India
Key decisionBritish Government formally agreed to partition India into two dominions — India and Pakistan
Legal formalizationIndian Independence Act, 1947 (passed 18 July 1947; came into force 14/15 August 1947)
Cripps Mission (for contrast)1942 mission proposing Dominion Status after WWII — rejected by Congress; did NOT concede partition
Cabinet Mission Plan (for contrast)1946 mission that proposed a federal structure and led to the formation of the Constituent Assembly; initially opposed a full partition, favoring a loosely federated India

5. The first session of the Constituent Assembly was held on

(A) December 9, 1946
(B) November 26, 1949
(C) August 15, 1947
(D) January 26, 1946

Answer: (A) December 9, 1946

Explanation: The first session of the Constituent Assembly of India was held on 9th December, 1946, at the Constitution Hall in New Delhi (now the Central Hall of Parliament House). Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha served as the temporary/interim Chairman for this inaugural session, before Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the permanent President two days later, on 11th December 1946.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Date of first session9th December, 1946
VenueConstitution Hall, New Delhi (now Central Hall of Parliament House)
Temporary ChairmanDr. Sachchidananda Sinha
Permanent President (elected 2 days later)Dr. Rajendra Prasad, on 11th December 1946
Boycotted byMuslim League members (demanding separate Pakistan)
Basis of Assembly’s formationCabinet Mission Plan, 1946

6. Which of the following was not one of the features of Government of India Act, 1935 ?

(A) Bicameral legislature
(B) Dyarchy of centre and the provinces
(C) Provincial autonomy
(D) All India Federation

Answer: (B) Dyarchy of centre and the provinces

Explanation: The Government of India Act, 1935, did NOT introduce Dyarchy at the Centre-Provinces level in the way this option suggests; instead, it abolished Dyarchy in the provinces (which had been introduced earlier by the Government of India Act, 1919) and replaced it with full Provincial Autonomy. However, the 1935 Act did introduce a form of Dyarchy at the Centre (Federal level) — dividing federal subjects between “Reserved” subjects (controlled by the Governor-General) and “Transferred” subjects (controlled by ministers responsible to the legislature) — but NOT a “Dyarchy of centre and provinces” as a combined single feature, which is why this option, as specifically worded, is the correct answer for what was NOT a feature. The actual features of the 1935 Act included Provincial Autonomy, an All-India Federation (never came into force), Bicameral legislatures in most provinces, and Dyarchy at the Centre only.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Features actually introduced by GoI Act, 1935Provincial Autonomy; All-India Federation (proposed, never came into force); Bicameral legislatures in several provinces; Dyarchy at the Centre (Federal level) only
What Dyarchy in provinces refers toIntroduced by the Government of India Act, 1919, and abolished by the 1935 Act
Dyarchy at Centre under 1935 ActDivided federal subjects into “Reserved” (Governor-General controlled) and “Transferred” (minister-responsible)
Why Option B is NOT a featureThe 1935 Act ended provincial Dyarchy and introduced Dyarchy only at the Centre — not a combined “Centre and provinces” Dyarchy structure

7. The Government of India Act, 1935 vested the residuary power in the

(A) British Parliament
(B) State Legislature
(C) Federal Legislature
(D) Governor-General

Answer: (D) Governor-General

Explanation: Under the Government of India Act, 1935, residuary powers (i.e., powers not specifically enumerated in the Federal List, Provincial List, or Concurrent List) were vested in the Governor-General of India, acting in his discretion. This was a unique feature compared to later Indian constitutional arrangements — under the current Indian Constitution, residuary powers rest with the Union Parliament (as per Article 248 and Entry 97 of the Union List), not with any single individual authority like a Governor-General.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ActGovernment of India Act, 1935
Residuary powers vested inGovernor-General (acting in his discretion)
Contrast with current Indian ConstitutionResiduary powers now rest with the Union Parliament (Article 248, Entry 97 of Union List)
Reason for this arrangement in 1935 ActReflected continued British colonial control, ensuring ultimate authority remained with the Crown’s representative
Lists established under 1935 ActFederal List, Provincial List, Concurrent List (basis for India’s later Union, State, and Concurrent Lists)

8. The Chairman of the Constituent Assembly was

(A) C. Rajagopalachari
(B) Jai Prakash Narayan
(C) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(D) Jawaharlal Nehru

Answer: (C) Dr. Rajendra Prasad

Explanation: Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the permanent President (Chairman) of the Constituent Assembly of India on 11th December 1946, two days after the Assembly’s first session on 9th December 1946. He presided over the Assembly throughout the nearly three-year constitution-making process and later went on to become the first President of independent India. Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha had earlier served as the temporary/interim Chairman only for the first sitting on 9th December 1946.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Permanent President/Chairman of Constituent AssemblyDr. Rajendra Prasad
Date elected11th December 1946
First session date9th December 1946
Temporary/interim Chairman (first sitting only)Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha
Later role of Dr. Rajendra PrasadFirst President of independent India
Chairman of the Drafting Committee (different role)Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
Objective Resolution mover (different role)Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru

9. India has borrowed the scheme of federation i.e. ‘Union of States” from which country?

(A) Ireland
(B) Canada
(C) USA
(D) Russia

Answer: (B) Canada

Explanation: The concept and terminology of “Union of States,” along with a federal scheme where the Centre holds a stronger position relative to the States (including possession of residuary powers), was borrowed from the Canadian Constitution. This model was considered more suitable for India’s needs at independence, given the priority placed on national unity and integration, as opposed to the more decentralized American federal model where states voluntarily came together and retain greater autonomy.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Feature“Union of States” federal scheme with strong Centre
Source countryCanada
Key similarity to Canadian modelResiduary powers vested with the Union/Centre, not the States (unlike USA)
Constitutional reflectionArticle 1 – “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States”
Contrast with USA’s federal modelAmerican federation formed via voluntary agreement of independent states; more state autonomy, residuary powers with states
Other Canadian-inspired featuresQuasi-federal system with unitary bias; strong central authority in distribution of powers

10. The framers of the Constitution borrowed the concept of Directive principles from

(A) Constitution of Switzerland
(B) Constitution of Ireland
(C) Government of India Act, 1935
(D) Constitution of USA

Answer: (B) Constitution of Ireland

Explanation: The Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP), enshrined in Part IV (Articles 36–51) of the Indian Constitution, were borrowed from the Constitution of Ireland, which itself had adopted a similar concept from the Spanish Constitution. These principles serve as guidelines or instructions for the State to follow while formulating policies and enacting laws, aiming to establish a welfare state by promoting social and economic democracy. Unlike Fundamental Rights, the Directive Principles are non-justiciable — meaning they cannot be enforced directly by courts — but they are considered fundamental in the governance of the country as per Article 37.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ConceptDirective Principles of State Policy (DPSP)
Source countryIreland
Original source (before Ireland)Ireland itself borrowed this concept from Spain
Part & ArticlesPart IV, Articles 36–51
Governing Article on enforceabilityArticle 37 – DPSPs are non-justiciable but “fundamental in the governance of the country”
PurposeEstablish social and economic democracy; guide the State in policy-making toward a welfare state

11. Which of the following Articles describe a person voluntarily acquiring citizenship of a foreign state not to be a citizen?

(A) Article 9
(B) Article 8
(C) Article 7
(D) Article 5

Answer: (A) Article 9

Explanation: Article 9 of the Indian Constitution, under Part II (Citizenship), provides that if a person has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign state, they shall NOT be treated as a citizen of India. This provision reflects and reinforces India’s concept of Single Citizenship, meaning Indian citizenship and foreign citizenship cannot be held simultaneously by voluntary choice of the individual (India does not generally recognize dual citizenship, though the separate, more limited status of “Overseas Citizen of India” (OCI) does exist).

Notes:

AspectDetail
ArticleArticle 9
Part of ConstitutionPart II (Citizenship)
Subject matterPersons who voluntarily acquire citizenship of a foreign state shall NOT be citizens of India
Related Articles in Part IIArticle 5 – citizenship by domicile; Article 6 – migrants from Pakistan; Article 7 – migrants to Pakistan; Article 8 – Persons of Indian origin residing outside India
Related concept reinforcedIndia’s policy of Single Citizenship (no dual citizenship)

12. The special status of Jammu & Kashmir implies the state as

(A) a separate judiciary
(B) a separate constitution
(C) a separate defense force
(D) All the above

Answer: (B) a separate constitution

Explanation: Prior to the abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019, Jammu and Kashmir’s special status under the Indian Constitution allowed it to have its own separate state Constitution (the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, which came into force on 26th January 1957) — a privilege unique among Indian states, since all other states are governed solely by the single Constitution of India. However, J&K did NOT have a fully separate judiciary independent of India’s judicial system (the Supreme Court of India’s jurisdiction extended to J&K), nor did it have a separate defence force (national defence remained exclusively under the control of the Union Government).

Notes:

AspectDetail
Special provision (historical)Article 370
J&K’s separate ConstitutionCame into force 26th January 1957; ceased to exist after August 2019
Did J&K have a separate judiciary?No — Supreme Court of India’s jurisdiction extended to J&K
Did J&K have a separate defence force?No — national defence remained solely under Union Government control
Major constitutional changeArticle 370 abrogated on 5 August 2019; J&K’s separate Constitution ceased; state reorganized into two Union Territories (Jammu & Kashmir, and Ladakh) effective 31 October 2019

13. Under the Government of India Act, 1935, the Federal Court had

(A) original jurisdiction only
(B) appellate jurisdiction only
(C) advisory jurisdiction only
(D) All the above

Answer: (D) All the above

Explanation: The Government of India Act, 1935, established the Federal Court of India (the predecessor to today’s Supreme Court of India), which was granted three distinct types of jurisdiction: Original Jurisdiction (to resolve disputes between the Federation and the Provinces, or between Provinces themselves), Appellate Jurisdiction (to hear appeals from High Courts in certain civil and criminal cases), and Advisory Jurisdiction (to give its opinion on questions of law referred to it by the Governor-General). This comprehensive jurisdictional structure of the Federal Court laid important groundwork for the later powers granted to the Supreme Court of India under the Constitution of 1950.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Court establishedFederal Court of India (under Government of India Act, 1935)
Original JurisdictionDisputes between Federation and Provinces, or between Provinces
Appellate JurisdictionAppeals from High Courts in specified civil and criminal matters
Advisory JurisdictionOpinion on questions of law referred by the Governor-General
First Chief Justice of Federal CourtSir Maurice Gwyer
Successor institutionSupreme Court of India (established 1950, under the Constitution)

14. For the first time, the system of appeals from India to Privy Council in England was introduced by the Charter of

(A) 1608
(B) 1683
(C) 1726
(D) 1833

Answer: (C) 1726

Explanation: The Charter of 1726, issued by King George I, established Mayor’s Courts in the three Presidency towns of Madras, Bombay, and Calcutta, and for the first time introduced the system of appeals from these Indian courts to the Privy Council in England. This was a significant development in the judicial history of colonial India, as it established a formal hierarchical connection between the Indian judicial system and the highest judicial authority in England, laying an early foundation for the appellate court structure that would evolve over subsequent centuries.

Notes:

AspectDetail
CharterCharter of 1726
Issued byKing George I
Key provisionEstablished Mayor’s Courts in Madras, Bombay, and Calcutta (the three Presidency towns)
Major significanceFirst introduced the system of appeals from Indian courts to the Privy Council in England
Other charters (for comparison)Charter of 1600 – established the East India Company; Charter of 1683 – established Admiralty Courts to deal with piracy and maritime cases; Charter of 1833 – made the Governor-General of Bengal the “Governor-General of India,” centralizing legislative power

15. Under the charter of 1687, a Mayor’s Court was established at Madras. The Mayor had to be

(A) Elected by the Alderman and the Burgesses every year
(B) Nominated by the company
(C) Senior-most Alderman to be next year
(D) Nominated by the company on the recommendation of the outgoing Mayor.

Answer: (A) Elected by the Alderman and the Burgesses every year

Explanation: The Charter of 1687, issued by the East India Company, established a Municipal Corporation and a Mayor’s Court at Madras — one of the earliest formal judicial institutions set up by the British in India. Under this charter, the Mayor of Madras was to be elected annually by the Aldermen and Burgesses (members of the municipal corporation), following a democratic-style election process rather than being directly appointed or nominated by the East India Company. This system reflected an early, limited attempt at self-governing municipal administration in colonial India, modeled loosely on English municipal traditions.

Notes:

AspectDetail
CharterCharter of 1687
Issued byEast India Company
Key establishmentMunicipal Corporation and Mayor’s Court at Madras
Method of selecting the MayorElected annually by the Aldermen and Burgesses
SignificanceOne of the earliest instances of a quasi-democratic municipal governance structure in colonial India

16. The east India Company was established by the British Crown in the year

(A) 1600 AD
(B) 1605 AD
(C) 1726 AD
(D) 1857 AD

Answer: (A) 1600 AD

Explanation: The English East India Company was established on 31st December, 1600, when Queen Elizabeth I granted a Royal Charter to a group of London merchants, giving them exclusive trading rights with the East Indies (which included India and other parts of Asia) for an initial period of 15 years. This Charter marked the formal beginning of the Company’s operations, eventually leading to its expansion from a trading enterprise into a major political and administrative power that came to control large parts of the Indian subcontinent over the following two centuries, until the Crown formally took over direct governance after the Revolt of 1857.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Establishment year1600 AD (Charter granted 31st December 1600)
Granted byQueen Elizabeth I
Initial purposeExclusive trading rights with the East Indies for 15 years
EvolutionGrew from a trading company into a major political/administrative power controlling large parts of India
End of Company ruleAfter the Revolt of 1857; Government of India Act, 1858 transferred control to the British Crown (start of direct Crown rule / British Raj)

WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper – 2017

1. In the Preamble of the Constitution of India the word ‘Secular’ was incorporated by

(A) 1st Amendment of the Constitution of India
(B) 15th Amendment of the Constitution of India
(C) 27th Amendment of the Constitution of India
(D) 42nd Amendment of the Constitution of India

Answer: (D) 42nd Amendment of the Constitution of India

Explanation: The word “Secular” was inserted into the Preamble of the Indian Constitution by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, along with the words “Socialist” and “Integrity.” This amendment, enacted during the National Emergency (1975–1977) under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s government, changed the Preamble’s description of India from “Sovereign Democratic Republic” to “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic.”

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976
Words added to Preamble“Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity”
Original (1950) Preamble wording“Sovereign Democratic Republic”
Amended Preamble wording“Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic”
Enacted duringNational Emergency (1975–1977), PM Indira Gandhi
Number of times Preamble amendedOnly once (1976)

2. National Capital Territory of Delhi has been constituted by

(A) 69th Amendment
(B) 75th Amendment
(C) 81st Amendment
(D) 52nd Amendment

Answer: (A) 69th Amendment

Explanation: The Constitution (Sixty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1991, inserted Articles 239AA and 239AB into the Constitution, granting Delhi the special status of “National Capital Territory of Delhi” (NCT of Delhi), along with its own Legislative Assembly and a Council of Ministers headed by a Chief Minister. However, key subjects like Police, Public Order, and Land remain under the control of the Union Government, administered through the Lieutenant Governor.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment69th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1991
Articles insertedArticle 239AA and 239AB
New nomenclatureNational Capital Territory of Delhi (NCT of Delhi)
Key provisionsLegislative Assembly for Delhi; Council of Ministers headed by Chief Minister
Subjects excluded from Delhi Assembly’s controlPublic Order, Police, and Land (remain with Union Government)
Administrative headLieutenant Governor (represents the Union Government)
Related ActGovernment of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act, 1991

3. The distribution of power between Centre and the States is based on the scheme provided in

(A) Minto-Morley Reforms, 1909
(B) Montagui-Chelmsford Act, 1919
(C) Government of India Act, 1935
(D) Indian Independence Act, 1947

Answer: (C) Government of India Act, 1935

Explanation: The scheme for distribution of powers between the Centre and the States/Provinces in the current Indian Constitution — divided into the Union List, State List, and Concurrent List (Seventh Schedule) — is based on and modeled after the three-fold division of legislative powers (Federal List, Provincial List, and Concurrent List) that was first introduced by the Government of India Act, 1935. Although the all-India federation proposed by this Act never actually came into force, the underlying scheme for distributing legislative subjects between different levels of government was retained and adapted by the framers of the Indian Constitution.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Source of power-distribution schemeGovernment of India Act, 1935
Original three lists (1935 Act)Federal List, Provincial List, Concurrent List
Current equivalent lists (Indian Constitution)Union List, State List, Concurrent List (Seventh Schedule)
Why the 1935 Act’s federation never fully workedPrincely States refused to join the proposed All-India Federation

4. In the event of changing the name of the State or for creation of a new State, the Constitution of India is required to be amended by Parliament by a

(A) simple majority as required under Articles 107 and 108.
(B) majority of total members of both the Houses under Article 368.
(C) special majority under Article 368.
(D) simple majority after obtained opinion of the concerned State under Article 3 of the Constitution.

Answer: (A) simple majority as required under Articles 107 and 108

Explanation: Under Article 3 of the Constitution, Parliament has the power to form new states or alter the name/boundaries of existing states through a simple legislative process, treated like an ordinary law — requiring only a simple majority of members present and voting, as per the general legislative procedure under Articles 107 and 108. While the President must first recommend such a bill and refer it to the concerned State Legislature for its views, that opinion is advisory only and NOT binding on Parliament, and no special majority under Article 368 (as required for constitutional amendments) is needed.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Governing Article for creation/renaming of StatesArticle 3
Type of majority requiredSimple majority (as per ordinary legislative procedure under Articles 107 & 108)
Role of PresidentMust recommend the bill before its introduction in Parliament
Role of concerned State LegislatureConsulted for its views, but the opinion is advisory only, NOT binding
Contrast with Article 368 (constitutional amendments)Requires special majority (2/3rd of members present & voting + majority of total membership), and for federal provisions, ratification by half the states

5. Which of the following legislation brought the character of Indian Government from ‘Unitary’ to ‘Federal’ ?

(A) Indian Council Act, 1909
(B) Government of India Act, 1919
(C) Government of India Act, 1935
(D) Indian Independence Act, 1947

Answer: (C) Government of India Act, 1935

Explanation: The Government of India Act, 1935, sought to transform the character of Indian governance from a unitary system to a federal one by proposing an All-India Federation comprising British Indian provinces and Princely States, along with a clear three-fold division of legislative subjects (Federal List, Provincial List, and Concurrent List). Although the proposed federation never actually came into force due to the Princely States’ refusal to join, the Act introduced significant federal features and Provincial Autonomy, marking the first substantive attempt to move India’s governance structure toward federalism.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ActGovernment of India Act, 1935
Key featureFirst attempt to shift India’s governance from unitary to federal
Structural changes proposedAll-India Federation (British provinces + Princely States); three-fold division of legislative subjects
Why the federation failed to materializePrincely States refused to join
Feature that did take effectProvincial Autonomy
Other Acts (for comparison)Indian Council Act, 1909 (Morley-Minto Reforms) – introduced separate electorates, no federal shift; Government of India Act, 1919 (Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms) – introduced Dyarchy in provinces, still largely unitary; Indian Independence Act, 1947 – dealt with independence/partition, not the federal structural shift

6. From which of the following Constitutions the Indian Constitution is not borrowed from

(A) Constitution of USA
(B) Constitution of Germany
(C) Constitution of Canada
(D) Constitution of China

Answer: (D) Constitution of China

Explanation: The Indian Constitution did NOT borrow any significant features from the Constitution of China. Instead, the framers of the Indian Constitution drew inspiration from a wide range of democratic constitutions around the world, including the USA (Fundamental Rights, Judicial Review, Independence of Judiciary), Canada (federal scheme with a strong Centre, “Union of States” terminology), Ireland (Directive Principles of State Policy, method of election of the President), UK (Parliamentary system, Rule of Law), Australia (Concurrent List, freedom of trade and commerce), Germany (Emergency provisions, particularly the suspension of Fundamental Rights during Emergency), and USSR (Fundamental Duties, Five-Year Plans concept). China, being a communist state with a fundamentally different governance philosophy, was not a source for India’s democratic constitutional framework.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Country NOT a source for Indian ConstitutionChina
USA’s contributionFundamental Rights, Judicial Review, Independence of Judiciary, Impeachment procedure, Post of Vice-President
Canada’s contributionFederal scheme with strong Centre, “Union of States” terminology, residuary powers with Centre
Germany’s contributionSuspension of Fundamental Rights during Emergency (Weimar Constitution influence)
Ireland’s contributionDirective Principles of State Policy, method of Presidential election, nomination of Rajya Sabha members
UK’s contributionParliamentary system, Rule of Law, Single citizenship, Bicameralism, Prerogative writs
Australia’s contributionConcurrent List, freedom of trade/commerce/intercourse
USSR’s contributionFundamental Duties, Five-Year Plans (economic philosophy influence)

7. By which amendment Act ‘Unity of the Nation’ was substituted by ‘Unity and integrity of the Nation’ in the Preamble of the Constitution ?

(A) 42nd Amendment Act, 1976
(B) 45th Amendment Act, 1980
(C) 44th Amendment Act, 1979
(D) None of the above

Answer: (A) 42nd Amendment Act, 1976

Explanation: The Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, substituted the phrase “unity of the Nation” with “unity and integrity of the Nation” in the Fraternity clause of the Preamble. This same amendment also added the words “Socialist” and “Secular” to the Preamble’s description of India, making it “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic,” while the Fraternity clause was expanded to read “…assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation.”

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976
Original Preamble phrase“…unity of the Nation”
Amended Preamble phrase“…unity and integrity of the Nation”
Other words added by the same amendment“Socialist” and “Secular”
Enacted duringNational Emergency (1975–1977), PM Indira Gandhi
Number of times Preamble amendedOnly once, in 1976
Related Fundamental Duty (different provision, similar wording)Article 51A(c) — duty “to uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India” (also introduced by 42nd Amendment)

8. The Chairman of the Constituent Assembly was

(A) Jawaharlal Nehru
(B) Jai Prakash Narayan
(C) C. Rajagopalachari
(D) Dr. Rajendra Prasad

Answer: (D) Dr. Rajendra Prasad

Explanation: Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the permanent President (Chairman) of the Constituent Assembly of India on 11th December 1946, two days after the Assembly’s first session on 9th December 1946. He presided over the Assembly throughout the nearly three-year constitution-making process and subsequently became the first President of independent India. Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha had earlier served only as the temporary/interim Chairman for the very first sitting.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Permanent President/Chairman of Constituent AssemblyDr. Rajendra Prasad
Date elected11th December 1946
First session date9th December 1946
Temporary/interim Chairman (first sitting only)Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha
Later role of Dr. Rajendra PrasadFirst President of independent India
Chairman of the Drafting Committee (different role)Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
Objective Resolution mover (different role)Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru

9. The First Commentary to the Constitution of India is written

(A) Dr. D. D. Basu
(B) Justice Vivian Bose
(C) Dr. Bijon Kumar Mukherjee
(D) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar

Answer: (A) Dr. D. D. Basu

Explanation: Dr. Durga Das Basu (D. D. Basu) is widely credited with writing the first detailed commentary on the Constitution of India, titled “Commentary on the Constitution of India,” first published in 1950 — the same year the Constitution came into force. This comprehensive multi-volume work has become one of the most authoritative and widely cited legal commentaries on Indian constitutional law, extensively referenced by courts, lawyers, and scholars for its in-depth analysis of constitutional provisions, case law, and comparative constitutional perspectives.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Author of first Commentary on the Constitution of IndiaDr. D. D. Basu (Durga Das Basu)
Title of the work“Commentary on the Constitution of India”
Year first published1950
SignificanceConsidered one of the most authoritative legal commentaries on Indian constitutional law; extensively cited in courts
Other notable constitutional scholars/jurists (for comparison)M. V. Pylee – author of “Constitutional Government in India” and other works; H. M. Seervai – author of “Constitutional Law of India,” another highly regarded commentary; Justice Vivian Bose and Dr. Bijon Kumar Mukherjee were notable judges but not primarily known as constitutional commentary authors

10. The Constitution 96th Amendment Act, 2011 altered the language of Oriya in 8th Schedule as

(A) Oriyan
(B) Odiya
(C) Orriya
(D) Odia

Answer: (D) Odia

Explanation: The Constitution (Ninety-sixth Amendment) Act, 2011, officially changed the name of the language “Oriya,” as listed in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution, to “Odia.” This amendment was undertaken alongside a broader move by the Odisha state government to standardize and correct the official spelling and pronunciation of both the state’s name (from “Orissa” to “Odisha”) and its language (from “Oriya” to “Odia”), aligning the official terminology more closely with the local Odia pronunciation and cultural identity. The state’s name change from Orissa to Odisha had been carried out slightly earlier, in 2011, through the Orissa (Alteration of Name) Act.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment96th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2011
Change made“Oriya” (language name in Eighth Schedule) changed to “Odia”
Related state name change“Orissa” changed to “Odisha” (via the Orissa (Alteration of Name) Act, 2011)
Reason for changeTo align official spelling/pronunciation with the local Odia language and cultural identity
Related Act for the state name changeOrissa (Alteration of Name) Act, 2011 (a separate legislative Act, distinct from this Constitutional Amendment for the language name)
Schedule affectedEighth Schedule (List of Scheduled/Recognized Languages)

11. Expression ‘socialist’ in the Preamble of the Constitution of India has been added by taking the views of

(A) Marx and Laski
(B) Marx and Gandhi
(C) Rousseau and Gandhi
(D) Gandhi and Hegel

Answer: (A) Marx and Laski

Explanation: The term “Socialist” in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution, inserted by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976, is generally understood to reflect a blend of ideological influences, primarily drawing on the socio-economic philosophies associated with Karl Marx (proponent of scientific socialism and class-based economic analysis) and Harold Laski (a prominent British political theorist known for his writings on democratic socialism and the welfare state). However, India’s brand of “socialism” as reflected in the Constitution is often described as “democratic socialism” — a mixed-economy model blending public and private sector participation, rather than the rigid, state-controlled communist model associated purely with Marxist theory.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Word“Socialist”
Added by42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976
Ideological influences creditedKarl Marx and Harold Laski
Nature of India’s “socialism”Democratic socialism — mixed economy blending public/private sectors, welfare-state orientation
Contrast with rigid CommunismIndia’s socialism does NOT mean complete state ownership/control of all means of production, unlike classical Marxist-Leninist states
Related earlier political milestoneAvadi Session of Indian National Congress (1955) — adopted “Socialistic Pattern of Society” as a policy goal, a precursor in spirit to this later constitutional insertion

WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper – 2016

1. The demand for a Constituent Assembly was for the first time authoritatively conceded by the British Government, though in an indirect way, through

(A) Shimla Conference
(B) August Offer (1940)
(C) Wavell Plan
(D) None of the above

Answer: (B) August Offer (1940)

Explanation: The August Offer of 1940, made by the then Viceroy Lord Linlithgow on behalf of the British Government, was the first occasion on which the British indirectly acknowledged and conceded the demand for a Constituent Assembly for India. While the demand for a Constituent Assembly had first been formally raised by the Indian National Congress in 1934 (with M.N. Roy often credited as the original proponent of the idea in 1934), it was only through the August Offer of 1940 that the British Government indicated, in principle, that the framing of India’s future constitution should primarily be the responsibility of Indians themselves, through a body representative of the Indian people — laying early groundwork for what eventually became the Constituent Assembly formed under the Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946.

Notes:

AspectDetail
EventAugust Offer, 1940
Made byLord Linlithgow (Viceroy of India), on behalf of British Government
SignificanceFirst indirect British acknowledgment of the demand for a Constituent Assembly
Original proponent of the idea (1934)M. N. Roy is often credited as first suggesting a Constituent Assembly, later formally adopted as a demand by the Indian National Congress in 1934–1935
Later concrete stepCabinet Mission Plan (1946) — actually established the Constituent Assembly
Shimla Conference (for comparison)1945, called by Lord Wavell to discuss constitutional issues; failed due to Congress-Muslim League disagreements over representation
Wavell Plan (for comparison)Refers to the plan associated with the Shimla Conference, 1945, focused on forming an interim government, not specifically the Constituent Assembly

2. Indian Legislature became “bicameral” through which of the following ?

(A) The Morley-Minto Reforms
(B) Montague-Chelmsford Reforms
(C) Government of India Act, 1935
(D) Indian Councils Act, 1892

Answer: (B) Montague-Chelmsford Reforms

Explanation: The Government of India Act, 1919 (commonly known as the Montague-Chelmsford Reforms, named after Secretary of State Edwin Montagu and Viceroy Lord Chelmsford) introduced bicameralism at the central level for the first time in Indian legislative history. It established a two-chamber central legislature consisting of the Council of State (Upper House) and the Legislative Assembly (Lower House). This was a significant step away from the earlier unicameral legislative structures that existed under previous Acts like the Indian Councils Act, 1892, and the Morley-Minto Reforms (Indian Councils Act, 1909).

Notes:

AspectDetail
Reform that introduced BicameralismMontague-Chelmsford Reforms (Government of India Act, 1919)
Named afterEdwin Montagu (Secretary of State) and Lord Chelmsford (Viceroy)
Upper House establishedCouncil of State
Lower House establishedLegislative Assembly
Other key features of GoI Act, 1919Introduced Dyarchy in the provinces (division of subjects into “Reserved” and “Transferred”)
Morley-Minto Reforms (for comparison)Indian Councils Act, 1909 — introduced separate electorates for Muslims, expanded legislative councils, but did NOT introduce bicameralism
Indian Councils Act, 1892 (for comparison)Expanded the size of legislative councils and introduced limited indirect elections, but legislature remained unicameral

3. Before 26 November, 1949 which among the following was the governing law of India ?

(A) The Cabinet Mission Plan
(B) Government of India Act, 1935
(C) Government of India Act, 1919
(D) Government of India Act, 1909

Answer: (B) Government of India Act, 1935

Explanation: Before the Constitution of India was adopted on 26th November, 1949 (and came into force on 26th January, 1950), India was governed under the provisions of the Government of India Act, 1935, as adapted and modified after independence in 1947. This Act, with necessary modifications made through the Indian Independence Act, 1947 (which removed provisions related to British paramountcy and the Secretary of State’s authority), continued to serve as the functional governing framework for India during the transitional period between independence (1947) and the adoption of the new Constitution (1949–1950).

Notes:

AspectDetail
Governing law before Constitution’s adoption (26 Nov 1949)Government of India Act, 1935 (as adapted post-1947)
Adaptation made throughIndian Independence Act, 1947 — removed provisions on British paramountcy, Secretary of State’s authority
Duration of this transitional governanceFrom 15th August 1947 (Independence) until 26th January 1950 (Constitution’s commencement)
Why not the 1919 or 1909 ActsThese were earlier, already superseded by the 1935 Act well before independence
Why not the Cabinet Mission PlanThe Cabinet Mission Plan (1946) was a political proposal for the Constituent Assembly’s formation, not an actual governing legal framework/constitution
Significant continuityMany administrative, judicial, and governance structures established by the 1935 Act were carried forward and adapted into India’s new Constitution once it came into force

4. Dr. Rajendra Prasad was not a member of which of the following committees of the constituent assembly ?

(A) Committee on the rules of procedure
(B) Finance and Staff Committee
(C) Ad hoc Committee on National Flag
(D) Order of Business Committee

Answer: (C) Ad hoc Committee on National Flag

Explanation: Dr. Rajendra Prasad, as the President of the Constituent Assembly, was a member and often chairman of several key procedural and administrative committees, including the Committee on Rules of Procedure, the Finance and Staff Committee, and the Order of Business Committee — all of which were closely tied to the day-to-day functioning and administration of the Assembly itself. However, the Ad hoc Committee on the National Flag, which was specifically constituted to decide on the design of independent India’s national flag, was chaired by Dr. Rajendra Prasad’s colleague J.B. Kripalani, and Dr. Prasad was not a member of this particular committee, as it was a more specialized, symbolic/ceremonial task delegated to a separate dedicated group.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Committee Dr. Rajendra Prasad was NOT a member ofAd hoc Committee on the National Flag
Chairman of the Flag CommitteeJ. B. Kripalani
Committees Dr. Rajendra Prasad WAS part ofCommittee on Rules of Procedure; Finance and Staff Committee; Order of Business Committee (often as Chairman, given his role as Assembly President)
Role of Rajendra Prasad in Constituent AssemblyPresident/permanent Chairman, overseeing administrative and procedural committees
National Flag adoption date22nd July, 1947 (by the Constituent Assembly)

5. Which among the following best supported the idea of inclusion of fundamental rights in our constitution ?

(A) Simon Commission, 1927
(B) Nehru Committee Report, 1928
(C) Swaraj Bill, 1895
(D) Sapru Committee Report on Constitutional proposals, 1945

Answer: (B) Nehru Committee Report, 1928

Explanation: The Nehru Committee Report of 1928, chaired by Motilal Nehru, was a landmark document prepared by an all-party committee of Indians in response to the British challenge (posed by Lord Birkenhead) to produce a constitution acceptable to all sections of Indian society. This report was one of the earliest and most significant Indian-drafted proposals to explicitly demand the inclusion of a set of Fundamental Rights (including rights to free expression, equality, and protection of minorities) in any future constitution for India, laying important ideological groundwork that would later influence the framers of the actual Indian Constitution’s Fundamental Rights provisions (Part III).

Notes:

AspectDetail
ReportNehru Committee Report, 1928
Chaired byMotilal Nehru
ContextPrepared in response to Lord Birkenhead’s challenge to Indians to draft an agreeable constitution
Key contributionOne of the earliest Indian demands for explicit inclusion of Fundamental Rights in a future constitution
Other notable features of the ReportAlso proposed Dominion Status for India (a more moderate demand compared to full independence, which was later superseded by more radical demands)
Simon Commission, 1927 (for comparison)An all-British commission (no Indian members) that reviewed constitutional reforms; boycotted by most Indian political parties; not focused on advocating Fundamental Rights
Sapru Committee Report, 1945 (for comparison)Focused more on constitutional proposals for communal harmony and minority safeguards during the transition period, closer to independence

6. Which of the following states in India is exempted from reservation for Scheduled Castes in Panchayati Raj institutions ?

(A) Rajasthan
(B) Assam
(C) Arunachal Pradesh
(D) Sikim

Answer: (C) Arunachal Pradesh

Explanation: Arunachal Pradesh is exempted from the provisions relating to reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes (SCs) in Panchayati Raj institutions under the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992. This exemption exists because Arunachal Pradesh has a negligible or nil Scheduled Caste population, as the vast majority of its population consists of Scheduled Tribes (STs). Since the very rationale for SC reservation (protecting a socially disadvantaged population that requires representation) does not practically apply given the demographic composition of the state, the Constitution appropriately exempts Arunachal Pradesh from this specific reservation requirement, while ST reservations remain fully applicable and highly relevant there.

Notes:

AspectDetail
State exempted from SC reservation in PanchayatsArunachal Pradesh
Reason for exemptionNegligible/nil Scheduled Caste population in the state
Governing Amendment73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992 (Panchayati Raj provisions, Part IX)
ST reservation status in Arunachal PradeshFully applicable and significant, given the state’s predominantly tribal population
Related Sixth Schedule fact (different context)Arunachal Pradesh is also NOT covered under the Sixth Schedule (unlike Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, Mizoram) — a separate but related “exception” fact about this state

7. Choose the incorrect sentence among the following :

(A) The objective resolution passed by Pt. Nehru was what became the Preamble of our constitution.
(B) Preamble is enforceable in court of law.
(C) Preamble of Indian constitution has been amended only once in 1976.
(D) Jawahar Lal Nehru was the strongest advocate of socialism.

Answer: (B) Preamble is enforceable in court of law.

Explanation: The incorrect statement is (B) — the Preamble of the Indian Constitution is NOT directly enforceable in a court of law. While the Preamble is considered an integral part of the Constitution and has been used by courts (notably in the Kesavananda Bharati case, 1973) as an important interpretative aid to understand the objectives and philosophy behind constitutional provisions, and even to determine the Constitution’s “Basic Structure,” it does not itself grant any specific justiciable right that a citizen can directly enforce through litigation. The other statements are correct: the Objective Resolution moved by Nehru did form the basis of the Preamble; the Preamble has indeed been amended only once (via the 42nd Amendment, 1976); and Nehru is widely regarded as one of the strongest political advocates for socialism in India’s independence movement and subsequent nation-building.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Incorrect statement(B) “Preamble is enforceable in court of law”
Correct legal positionPreamble is NOT directly enforceable/justiciable; it’s an interpretative and philosophical guide, not a source of specific rights
Landmark case establishing Preamble’s importanceKesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala (1973) — held Preamble is part of the Constitution and reflects its Basic Structure
Statement (A) – correctnessTRUE — Objective Resolution (moved by Nehru, 1946) formed the basis of the Preamble
Statement (C) – correctnessTRUE — Preamble amended only once, via 42nd Amendment, 1976
Statement (D) – correctnessTRUE — Nehru was a strong political advocate for socialism (reflected in Avadi Session, 1955, and later 42nd Amendment adding “Socialist” to Preamble)

8. The Assam Reorganization Act. 1969 created which of the following state / states ?

(A) Meghalaya only
(B) Meghalaya and Mizoram
(C) Mizoram only
(D) Manipur, Tripura and Nagaland

Answer: (A) Meghalaya only

Explanation: The Assam Reorganisation (Meghalaya) Act, 1969, created the autonomous state of Meghalaya within Assam, carving it out from the Khasi, Jaintia, and Garo Hills districts. Initially, Meghalaya was given the status of an “Autonomous State” within Assam under this 1969 Act, with its own legislature and Council of Ministers, but with certain subjects still under the control of the Governor of Assam. Full statehood for Meghalaya was granted later, through the North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act, 1971, which came into effect on 21st January, 1972, making it a fully independent state of the Indian Union.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ActAssam Reorganisation (Meghalaya) Act, 1969
State created (initial status)Meghalaya (given status of “Autonomous State” within Assam)
Districts carved outKhasi, Jaintia, and Garo Hills
Full statehood granted byNorth-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act, 1971, effective 21st January 1972
Other states created by the 1971 Act (for comparison)Manipur and Tripura also became full states in 1972; Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh remained Union Territories at that time (became states later in 1987)

9. Which of the following were added to the list of Union Territories in North-eastern Reorganization Act of 1971 ?

(A) Mizoram
(B) Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh
(C) Sikim, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh
(D) Tripura and Mizoram

Answer: (B) Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh

Explanation: The North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act, 1971, which came into effect on 21st January, 1972, reorganized the northeastern region of India significantly. While it granted full statehood to Meghalaya, Manipur, and Tripura, it created Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh (the latter renamed from the North-East Frontier Agency, NEFA) as new Union Territories, rather than granting them full statehood immediately. Both Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh had to wait until 1987 to attain full statehood, achieved through separate subsequent legislation (the 53rd Amendment for Mizoram, and the State of Arunachal Pradesh Act, 1986, effective 1987, for Arunachal Pradesh).

Notes:

AspectDetail
ActNorth-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act, 1971
Effective date21st January, 1972
States granted full statehood by this ActMeghalaya, Manipur, Tripura
Union Territories created by this ActMizoram, Arunachal Pradesh (renamed from NEFA)
Later full statehood for Mizoram1987, via 53rd Constitutional Amendment Act
Later full statehood for Arunachal Pradesh1987, via State of Arunachal Pradesh Act, 1986
Sikkim’s status (for comparison)NOT part of this 1971 Act at all — Sikkim was a separate protectorate at that time, later became an “Associate State” in 1974 (35th Amendment) and a full state in 1975 (36th Amendment) — its integration followed a completely different, later process

10. Which among the following act is the latest ?

(A) The Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh (transfer of Territories) Act.
(B) Bihar Reorganization Act.
(C) Uttar Pradesh Reorganization Act.
(D) Madhya Pradesh Reorganization Act.

Answer: (C) Uttar Pradesh Reorganization Act

Explanation: Among the given options, the Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000, is the most recent. This Act led to the creation of the new state of Uttarakhand (initially named Uttaranchal) by carving out the hill districts from Uttar Pradesh. In comparison, the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 (which created Jharkhand) and the Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 (which created Chhattisgarh) were passed in the same year, while the Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh (Transfer of Territories) Act is a much older, comparatively minor territorial adjustment act. All three major reorganisation acts — for UP, Bihar, and MP — were passed in the same year (2000), leading to the simultaneous creation of Uttarakhand, Jharkhand, and Chhattisgarh, but the exact order/timing within that year can make Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act the technically most recent for this comparison.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Latest Act (per this question)Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000
New state createdUttarakhand (initially named “Uttaranchal”)
Bihar Reorganisation Act2000 — created Jharkhand
Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act2000 — created Chhattisgarh
All three (UP, Bihar, MP) reorganisationPassed in the same year, 2000, creating three new states simultaneously in that period
Rajasthan and MP (Transfer of Territories) ActAn older, minor territorial adjustment act, not related to creation of a new state

11. Rajaji Formula was suggested by C. Rajagopalachari in 1944 primarily with a view to

(A) resolve the political deadlock in the country.
(B) seek the withdrawal of communal electorates.
(C) secure greater weightage for the Congress in provincial govt.
(D) impress on the government to withdraw from India within a year of the close of Second World War.

Answer: (A) resolve the political deadlock in the country

Explanation: The Rajaji Formula (also known as the C.R. Formula), proposed by C. Rajagopalachari in 1944, was an attempt to resolve the growing political deadlock between the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League over the question of Pakistan and communal representation. The formula suggested that the Muslim League should support the Congress’s demand for independence, and in return, after the war, a plebiscite would be held in Muslim-majority areas of the North-West and North-East of India to decide on the formation of a separate sovereign state (Pakistan), subject to certain conditions like mutual agreements on defence, commerce, and communications. Although the formula was primarily aimed at breaking the political deadlock between the two major parties, it was ultimately rejected by Muslim League leader Mohammad Ali Jinnah, who felt it did not go far enough in unconditionally recognizing Pakistan, and was also criticized by some Congress leaders and Hindu organizations for conceding too much toward partition.

Notes:

AspectDetail
FormulaRajaji Formula (C.R. Formula)
Proposed byC. Rajagopalachari
Year1944
Primary objectiveResolve the political deadlock between Congress and Muslim League
Key proposalMuslim League to support Congress’s independence demand; post-war plebiscite in Muslim-majority NW/NE regions on formation of Pakistan
OutcomeRejected by Jinnah (Muslim League) — felt insufficient recognition of Pakistan; also criticized by some Congress/Hindu leaders for conceding too much
Later related developmentGandhi-Jinnah talks of 1944 were based on discussions around this very formula, but also failed to reach consensus

12. Which among the following Article deals with the rights of citizenships of certain persons of Indian origin residing outside of India ?

(A) Article 6
(B) Article 7
(C) Article 8
(D) Article 9

Answer: (C) Article 8

Explanation: Article 8 of the Indian Constitution, under Part II (Citizenship), deals specifically with the rights of citizenship of certain persons of Indian origin who are residing outside India. It provides that a person, or either of whose parents or grandparents, was born in undivided India (as defined by the Government of India Act, 1935), and who is ordinarily residing in any country outside India, can register themselves as a citizen of India by making an application to the diplomatic or consular representative of India in that country, subject to conditions prescribed by the Government of India.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ArticleArticle 8
Part of ConstitutionPart II (Citizenship)
Subject matterRights of citizenship for persons of Indian origin residing outside India
Eligibility conditionPerson, or parent/grandparent, born in undivided India (as per Government of India Act, 1935 definition)
Method of acquiring citizenship under Article 8Registration with the Indian diplomatic/consular representative in the country of residence
Related Articles in Part IIArticle 5 – citizenship by domicile; Article 6 – migrants from Pakistan; Article 7 – migrants to Pakistan; Article 9 – voluntary acquisition of foreign citizenship (loses Indian citizenship eligibility)

13. January 26, 1957 is known for which of the following ?

(A) Second parliamentary term began
(B) Second general elections
(C) Second five year plan terms started
(D) Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir came into force

Answer: (D) Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir came into force

Explanation: The Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, drafted by the state’s own Constituent Assembly, came into force on 26th January, 1957 — deliberately chosen to coincide with the Republic Day of India, symbolizing J&K’s special constitutional relationship with the Indian Union under Article 370. This separate state constitution governed J&K’s internal administrative and political matters (in areas not covered by the special provisions of Article 370) until it ceased to exist following the abrogation of Article 370 by the Indian Parliament in August 2019, after which J&K was reorganized into two separate Union Territories.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Event on 26 January 1957Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir came into force
Drafted byJ&K’s own Constituent Assembly
Significance of the date chosenCoincided with India’s Republic Day, symbolizing J&K’s special relationship with the Indian Union
Enabling provisionArticle 370 of the Indian Constitution
Status after August 2019J&K’s separate Constitution ceased to exist after Article 370’s abrogation; state reorganized into two Union Territories (J&K and Ladakh), effective 31 October 2019
Second General Elections (for comparison)Held in 1957 (India’s second Lok Sabha elections) — occurred in the same year, but is a distinct, unrelated event from J&K’s Constitution coming into force
Second Five-Year Plan (for comparison)Started in 1956 (not specifically tied to 26 January 1957)

14. The design of the National Flag was adopted by the Constituent Assembly of India in-

(A) July 1946
(B) July 1950
(C) July 1947
(D) August 1947

Answer: (C) July 1947

Explanation: The design of the National Flag of India — the tricolour with the Ashoka Chakra at its center — was adopted by the Constituent Assembly of India on 22nd July, 1947, just a few weeks before India’s independence on 15th August, 1947. This flag was based on the earlier Swaraj Flag of the Indian National Congress, with the charkha (spinning wheel) replaced by the Ashoka Chakra (a 24-spoke wheel representing the Dharma Chakra) to make it a more universally acceptable national symbol for independent India.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Date of adoption22nd July, 1947
Adopted byConstituent Assembly of India
Basis of designSwaraj Flag of Indian National Congress (designed by Pingali Venkayya)
Key change madeCharkha (spinning wheel) replaced with Ashoka Chakra (24-spoke wheel)
ColoursSaffron (top) – courage/sacrifice; White (middle) – truth/peace; Green (bottom) – fertility/growth
Ashoka Chakra representsDharma Chakra (Wheel of Law), taken from the Lion Capital of Ashoka at Sarnath

15. How many members were there in Constituent Assembly ?

(A) 389
(B) 395
(C) 405
(D) 379

Answer: (A) 389

Explanation: The Constituent Assembly of India, as originally constituted under the Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946, was designed to have 389 members in total — comprising 292 members from British Indian provinces, 4 members from the Chief Commissioner’s provinces, and 93 members representing the Princely States. However, following the Partition of India in 1947 and the subsequent withdrawal of Muslim League members (who moved to Pakistan’s separate Constituent Assembly), the actual working strength of the Assembly that framed India’s Constitution was reduced to 299 members.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Original total strength (Cabinet Mission Plan, 1946)389
Break-up of original 389292 (British Indian provinces) + 4 (Chief Commissioner’s provinces) + 93 (Princely States)
Strength after Partition (1947)Reduced to 299 (due to Muslim League members’ withdrawal to Pakistan)
Basis of formationCabinet Mission Plan, 1946

16. Which among the following is not correctly matched ?

(A) Schedule Two – Salaries and Allowances
(B) Schedule Five – Scheduled Areas
(C) Schedule Six – Tribal Areas of Assam, Meghalaya and Mizoram
(D) Schedule Ten – Panchayats

Answer: (D) Schedule Ten – Panchayats

Explanation: The incorrectly matched pair is (D) — the Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution does NOT deal with Panchayats; instead, it deals with the Anti-Defection Law, added by the 52nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1985, laying down provisions for the disqualification of MPs/MLAs on grounds of political defection. Panchayats are actually covered under the Eleventh Schedule, added by the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992. The other three matches are correct: the Second Schedule deals with Salaries and Allowances of the President, Governors, Judges, and other officials; the Fifth Schedule deals with the Administration of Scheduled Areas and Scheduled Tribes; and the Sixth Schedule deals with the Administration of Tribal Areas in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Incorrect match(D) Schedule Ten – Panchayats
Correct subject of Tenth ScheduleAnti-Defection Law (added by 52nd Amendment, 1985)
Correct Schedule for PanchayatsEleventh Schedule (added by 73rd Amendment, 1992)
Second Schedule (correct)Salaries, allowances, privileges of President, Governors, Speaker, Judges, CAG, etc.
Fifth Schedule (correct)Administration of Scheduled Areas and Scheduled Tribes (states other than Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, Mizoram)
Sixth Schedule (correct)Administration of Tribal Areas in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram — note option (C) mentions only 3 states (Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram), omitting Tripura, but this is still considered “correctly matched” for the purposes of this MCQ since the core subject match (Tribal Areas) is accurate
Twelfth Schedule (for context)Municipalities (74th Amendment, 1992)

17. Which of the following parts of Indian Constitution has only one article ?

(A) Part XVII
(B) Part XVIII
(C) Part XIX
(D) Part XX

Answer: (D) Part XX

Explanation: Part XX of the Indian Constitution, titled “Amendment of the Constitution,” contains only a single Article — Article 368 — which lays down the procedure for amending the Constitution (including provisions for simple majority, special majority, and special majority with state ratification, depending on the nature of the provision being amended). This makes Part XX one of the shortest parts of the Constitution in terms of article count, despite dealing with an extremely significant subject matter — the process by which the entire Constitution itself can be legally altered.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Part with only one ArticlePart XX
Title of Part XX“Amendment of the Constitution”
Article containedArticle 368
Significance of Article 368Lays down procedure for constitutional amendments (simple majority / special majority / special majority + state ratification)
Part XVII (for comparison)“Official Language” — contains multiple articles (343–351)
Part XVIII (for comparison)“Emergency Provisions” — contains multiple articles (352–360)
Part XIX (for comparison)“Miscellaneous” — contains multiple articles (361–367)

18. Which among the following pair is not correctly matched ?

(A) Part Ill – Fundamental Rights.
(B) Part XI – Relationships between the Union and States.
(C) Part XII – Finance, Property, Contracts and Suits.
(D) Part XIX – Amendment of the constitution.

Answer: (D) Part XIX – Amendment of the constitution

Explanation: The incorrectly matched pair is (D). “Amendment of the Constitution” is actually the subject matter of Part XX (containing Article 368), not Part XIX. Part XIX of the Constitution is titled “Miscellaneous” and deals with various residual matters (Articles 361–367) not covered elsewhere, such as protection of the President and Governors from court proceedings, special provisions regarding disputes related to elections of the President/Vice-President, and interpretation-related provisions. The other three matches are correct: Part III does indeed deal with Fundamental Rights; Part XI covers Relations between the Union and the States (legislative and administrative relations); and Part XII deals with Finance, Property, Contracts, and Suits.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Incorrect match(D) Part XIX – Amendment of the constitution
Correct subject of Part XIX“Miscellaneous” (Articles 361–367)
Correct Part for Amendment of the ConstitutionPart XX (contains only Article 368)
Part III (correct)Fundamental Rights (Articles 12–35)
Part XI (correct)Relations between the Union and the States (Articles 245–263)
Part XII (correct)Finance, Property, Contracts, and Suits (Articles 264–300A)

19. Which was the first state established on the basis of linguistic ?

(A) U.P.
(B) Andhra Pradesh
(C) Tamil Nadu
(D) Kerala

Answer: (B) Andhra Pradesh

Explanation: Andhra Pradesh was the first state in independent India to be created purely on a linguistic basis, formed in 1953 by carving out the Telugu-speaking areas from the erstwhile Madras Presidency (state of Madras). This creation was a direct result of a prolonged agitation demanding a separate state for Telugu speakers, which culminated dramatically in the fast-unto-death of the freedom fighter Potti Sriramulu, who died on 15th December 1952 after 58 days of fasting. His death triggered widespread public unrest and forced the Indian government to act, leading to the formation of Andhra State on 1st October 1953. This event, in turn, directly triggered the broader linguistic reorganization of all Indian states through the States Reorganisation Act, 1956.

Notes:

AspectDetail
First state created on linguistic basisAndhra Pradesh (initially as “Andhra State”)
Year of creation1953 (formed 1st October 1953)
Carved out fromMadras Presidency (State of Madras)
Key figure whose fast triggered creationPotti Sriramulu (died 15 December 1952, after 58-day fast)
Broader consequenceDirectly led to the formation of the States Reorganisation Commission (SRC) and the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, which reorganized ALL Indian states on a linguistic basis
Later renaming“Andhra State” was later merged with Telangana region (from Hyderabad State) in 1956 to form the full “Andhra Pradesh”

WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper – 2015

1. India is Union of States. This means

(A) That the Indian federation is not the result of an agreement between States
(B) That the original federation of States gave way to Sovereign Republic
(C) That the Constituent Assembly has created the unitary State of India
(D) That the making of the Indian Union was preceded by the prolonged struggle for freedom from foreign rule.

Answer: (A) That the Indian federation is not the result of an agreement between States

Explanation: Dr. B. R. Ambedkar explained in the Constituent Assembly debates that the term “Union of States” was deliberately chosen over “Federation of States” to convey two key ideas: first, that the Indian federation is NOT the result of an agreement between previously independent or sovereign states (unlike the USA, where independent states voluntarily came together to form a federal union through mutual agreement); and second, that no state possesses the right to secede from the Union, since it wasn’t formed by consent-based agreement in the first place. This makes the Indian Union indestructible.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Constitutional ArticleArticle 1
Exact phrase“India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States”
Core meaning of “Union” (per Ambedkar)Indian federation was NOT formed by agreement between states (unlike USA); no state can secede
Explained byDr. B. R. Ambedkar, in Constituent Assembly debates
Contrast with USAUS federation formed via voluntary agreement of independent, pre-existing sovereign states

2. Who was the chairman of the Constituent Assembly ?

(A) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(B) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(C) Rajagopalachari
(D) Jawaharlal Nehru

Answer: (A) Dr. Rajendra Prasad

Explanation: Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the permanent President/Chairman of the Constituent Assembly of India on 11th December 1946, two days after the Assembly’s first session on 9th December 1946. He presided over the Assembly for the entire duration of the constitution-making process (nearly three years) and later became the first President of independent India.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Permanent President/Chairman of Constituent AssemblyDr. Rajendra Prasad
Date elected11th December 1946
First session date9th December 1946
Temporary/interim Chairman (first sitting only)Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha
Later role of Dr. Rajendra PrasadFirst President of independent India
Chairman of the Drafting Committee (different role)Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
Objective Resolution mover (different role)Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru

3. Name the Chairman of the Fundamental Rights Sub-Committee of the Constituent Assembly :

(A) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(B) J. B. Kripalani
(C) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(D) Gopinath Bardoloi

Answer: (B) J. B. Kripalani

Explanation: J. B. Kripalani (Acharya Jivatram Bhagwandas Kripalani) served as the Chairman of the Fundamental Rights Sub-Committee of the Constituent Assembly. This sub-committee was constituted under the broader Advisory Committee on Fundamental Rights, Minorities, and Tribal and Excluded Areas, which was chaired overall by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel. The Fundamental Rights Sub-Committee, under Kripalani’s leadership, was specifically tasked with drafting and finalizing the provisions related to Fundamental Rights (which eventually became Part III of the Constitution), examining various rights proposals and ensuring they aligned with democratic principles while considering practical governance needs.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Chairman of Fundamental Rights Sub-CommitteeJ. B. Kripalani
Broader parent committeeAdvisory Committee on Fundamental Rights, Minorities, and Tribal and Excluded Areas
Chairman of the broader Advisory CommitteeSardar Vallabhbhai Patel
Kripalani’s other notable role (for context)Also chaired the Ad hoc Committee on the National Flag (as tested in 2016 Q4)
Gopinath Bardoloi (for comparison)Chaired the Sub-Committee on North-East Frontier (Assam) Tribal and Excluded Areas, a different specialized sub-committee
Dr. Rajendra Prasad (for comparison)President of the Constituent Assembly overall — not specifically the Fundamental Rights Sub-Committee Chairman

4. Which of the following Union Territories attained statehood in February 1987 ?

(A) Arunachal Pradesh
(B) Daman and Diu
(C) Goa
(D) Pondicherry

Answer: (A) Arunachal Pradesh

Explanation: Arunachal Pradesh, which had been a Union Territory since 1972 (having earlier been known as the North-East Frontier Agency, NEFA), attained full statehood on 20th February, 1987, through the State of Arunachal Pradesh Act, 1986. This made it the 24th state of the Indian Union. Notably, Mizoram also attained statehood on the very same date (20 February 1987), becoming the 23rd state, while Daman and Diu and Puducherry (Pondicherry) remain Union Territories to this day, and Goa attained statehood slightly later, on 30th May, 1987.

Notes:

AspectDetail
State that attained statehood in Feb 1987Arunachal Pradesh
Exact date20th February, 1987
Governing ActState of Arunachal Pradesh Act, 1986
Former name/statusNorth-East Frontier Agency (NEFA); Union Territory since 1972
Sequence in Indian Union24th State of India
Same-day statehoodMizoram also became a state (23rd) on the very same date, 20 Feb 1987
Goa’s statehood (for comparison)30th May, 1987 (25th State) — slightly later than Arunachal Pradesh and Mizoram
Daman and Diu, and Pondicherry (for comparison)Both remain Union Territories to this day; NOT converted to full states

5. The 53rd Amendment to the Indian Constitution in 1986 inserted a new Article conferring full statehood on :

(A) Mizoram
(B) Tripura
(C) Meghalaya
(D) Nagaland

Answer: (A) Mizoram

Explanation: The Constitution (Fifty-third Amendment) Act, 1986, inserted Article 371G into the Constitution, granting full statehood to Mizoram. This followed the Mizo Accord (Memorandum of Settlement) signed in June 1986 between the Government of India and the Mizo National Front (MNF) leader Laldenga, which ended decades of insurgency in the region. Mizoram thus became the 23rd state of the Indian Union, with statehood effective from 20th February, 1987.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Amendment53rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1986
Article insertedArticle 371G – Special provision with respect to the State of Mizoram
State granted statehoodMizoram
Statehood effective date20th February 1987
Sequence in Indian Union23rd State of India
BackgroundMizo Accord (1986) between Government of India and Mizo National Front (Laldenga), ending Mizo insurgency
Special protections under Article 371GProtects Mizo customary law and religious/social practices; ownership/transfer of land in Mizoram cannot be legislated by Parliament without the State Assembly’s consent

6. What is the special constitutional position of Jammu and Kashmir ?

(A) Indian laws are not applicable
(B) It is not part of the Indian Union
(C) It has its own constitution
(D) It has a separate judiciary

Answer: (C) It has its own constitution

Explanation: Historically, prior to the abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019, Jammu and Kashmir enjoyed special status under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, which allowed it to have its own separate state Constitution (the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, which came into force on 26th January 1957) — a unique privilege not enjoyed by any other Indian state. However, J&K was always very much a part of the Indian Union (Option B is factually incorrect), Indian laws did apply to J&K (with some modifications/exceptions under Article 370, making Option A incorrect), and it did NOT have a fully separate judiciary independent of India’s judicial system, since the Supreme Court of India’s jurisdiction extended to J&K as well (making Option D incorrect).

Notes:

AspectDetail
Special provision (historical)Article 370
J&K’s separate ConstitutionCame into force 26th January 1957; ceased to exist after August 2019
Was J&K part of the Indian Union?Yes, always — Option (B) is factually incorrect
Did Indian laws apply to J&K?Yes, with certain modifications/exceptions under Article 370 — Option (A) is incorrect
Did J&K have a separate judiciary?No — Supreme Court of India’s jurisdiction extended to J&K — Option (D) is incorrect
Major constitutional changeArticle 370 abrogated on 5 August 2019; J&K’s separate Constitution ceased to exist; state reorganized into two Union Territories (J&K and Ladakh), effective 31 October 2019

7. The preamble to the Indian Constitution was amended in which year ?

(A) 1974
(B) 1975
(C) 1976
(D) 1977

Answer: (C) 1976

Explanation: The Preamble to the Indian Constitution was amended in 1976, through the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, which inserted the words “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity” into the Preamble’s text. This amendment was enacted during the period of National Emergency (1975–1977) under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s government, and remains the only instance in which the Preamble’s original text has been amended.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Year of Preamble amendment1976
Amendment42nd Constitutional Amendment Act
Words added to Preamble“Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity”
Original (1950) Preamble wording“Sovereign Democratic Republic…unity of the Nation”
Amended Preamble wording“Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic…unity and integrity of the Nation”
Enacted duringNational Emergency (1975–1977), PM Indira Gandhi
Number of times Preamble amendedOnly once (1976)

8. The drafting committee of the Indian Constitution was formed by the Constituent Assembly on :

(A) 29th August, 1947
(B) 30th August, 1948
(C) 29th August, 1946
(D) 30th August, 1949

Answer: (A) 29th August, 1947

Explanation: The Drafting Committee of the Constituent Assembly was formally constituted on 29th August, 1947, just two weeks after India’s independence on 15th August, 1947. This seven-member committee, chaired by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, was tasked with scrutinizing the initial draft Constitution (prepared by Constitutional Advisor B. N. Rau) in meticulous detail and preparing the final draft for consideration, debate, and adoption by the full Constituent Assembly. The Committee worked diligently over the following two years, holding extensive deliberations before the Constitution was finally adopted on 26th November, 1949.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Date Drafting Committee formed29th August, 1947
ChairmanDr. B. R. Ambedkar
Total members7 (including Ambedkar)
Other membersN. Gopalaswami Ayyangar, Alladi Krishnaswamy Ayyar, Dr. K. M. Munshi, Syed Mohammad Saadullah, N. Madhava Rau, T. T. Krishnamachari
Preceding stepInitial draft prepared by Constitutional Advisor B. N. Rau, before being handed to this Committee for detailed scrutiny
Timeline contextFormed just 2 weeks after Independence (15 Aug 1947); Constitution finally adopted over 2 years later, on 26 Nov 1949

9. The Constitution of India was enacted by a Constituent Assembly set-up under the recommendation of :

(A) Cabinet Mission Plan
(B) Wavell Plan
(C) Mountbatten Plan
(D) Crips Mission

Answer: (A) Cabinet Mission Plan

Explanation: The Constituent Assembly of India, which eventually enacted the Constitution, was constituted according to the proposals put forth by the Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946. The Cabinet Mission, comprising three British Cabinet ministers — Lord Pethick-Lawrence, Sir Stafford Cripps, and A. V. Alexander — visited India in 1946 and proposed a scheme for indirect election of Constituent Assembly members by Provincial Legislative Assembly members, along with representation from the Princely States, leading to the formation of the 389-member Assembly that first met on 9th December, 1946.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Basis of Constituent Assembly’s formationCabinet Mission Plan, 1946
Members of Cabinet MissionLord Pethick-Lawrence, Sir Stafford Cripps, A. V. Alexander
Original Constituent Assembly strength389 members
Method of electionIndirect election by Provincial Legislative Assembly members + nomination from Princely States
First meeting date9th December 1946
Cripps Mission (different, earlier event)1942 mission led by Stafford Cripps alone, proposing Dominion Status — rejected by Congress; did NOT create the Constituent Assembly
Mountbatten Plan (different, later event)June 1947 plan leading to Partition and transfer of power — unrelated to the Assembly’s formation
Wavell Plan (different event)Associated with the Shimla Conference, 1945, focused on forming an interim government — also unrelated to the Assembly’s formation

10. In the National Flag which colour is used in the wheel ?

(A) Black
(B) White
(C) Navy Blue
(D) Blue

Answer: (C) Navy Blue

Explanation: The Ashoka Chakra, the 24-spoke wheel placed at the center of the National Flag of India, is colored Navy Blue. It is positioned in the center of the white band of the tricolour flag, and it represents the “Dharma Chakra” (Wheel of Law), which was originally found on the Lion Capital of Ashoka at Sarnath. The Navy Blue color, along with the wheel’s 24 spokes, symbolizes movement, progress, and the eternal wheel of righteousness/law that should guide the nation. While often loosely referred to simply as “blue” in casual conversation, the precise official color specified for the Ashoka Chakra is Navy Blue.

Notes:

AspectDetail
Colour of the wheel (Ashoka Chakra)Navy Blue
Name of the wheelAshoka Chakra (Dharma Chakra / Wheel of Law)
Number of spokes24
Position on flagCenter of the white band
Origin of designLion Capital of Ashoka at Sarnath
SymbolismRepresents movement, progress, and eternal wheel of righteousness/law

11. Fill in the Blank : The Union Territories are specified in the _____

(A) 2nd Schedule
(B) 1st Schedule
(C) 3rd Schedule
(D) 4th Schedule

Answer: (B) 1st Schedule

Explanation: The First Schedule of the Indian Constitution specifies the names of the States and Union Territories that comprise the Indian Union, along with their respective territorial extents (i.e., which districts/areas fall within each state or Union Territory’s boundaries). This schedule is directly linked to Article 1 of the Constitution, which declares “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States,” and it provides the detailed, official listing of all constituent states and Union Territories that make up the country, subject to periodic amendments whenever new states are created or boundaries are altered.

Notes:

AspectDetail
ScheduleFirst Schedule
Subject matterNames of States and Union Territories, along with their territorial extent
Related ArticleArticle 1 – “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States”
Nature of contentLists all States and UTs; updated periodically through amendments whenever states are created, renamed, or reorganized
Second Schedule (for comparison)Salaries and Allowances of President, Governors, Judges, etc.
Third Schedule (for comparison)Forms of Oaths and Affirmations
Fourth Schedule (for comparison)Allocation of seats in the Rajya Sabha to States/UTs

Read more:

  1. WBCS Prelims Indian Economy Questions and Answers
  2. WBCS Main Census & Demography Questions and Answers

Sourch of questions: WBPSC official website

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *