WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper –2023
1. Choose the correct statement stated in the Constitution of India :
(A) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Federation of States
(B) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States
(C) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Quasi Federal State
(D) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Unitary State
Answer: (B) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States
Explanation: Article 1 of the Indian Constitution begins with the declaration “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.” This phrasing was deliberately chosen by the framers, particularly Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, instead of “Federation of States.” The word “Union” signifies two important things: first, the Indian federation is not the result of an agreement among states (unlike the USA, where independent states came together voluntarily to form a union), and second, no state has the right to secede from the Union. This makes the Indian Union indestructible, even though it is federal in structure.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Constitutional Article | Article 1 |
| Exact phrase used | “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States” |
| Why “Union” and not “Federation” | Indicates the federation is not born of an agreement between states; states cannot secede |
| Coined/explained by | Dr. B. R. Ambedkar (in the Constituent Assembly debates) |
| Nature of Indian federation | Often called “quasi-federal” or “federal with unitary bias” by scholars (e.g., K.C. Wheare), but the Constitution itself uses “Union of States,” not “Quasi Federal” |
2. National Capital Territory of Delhi was constituted by
(A) Ordinance promulgated by the Lieutenant Governor
(B) Ordinance promulgated by the President
(C) 71 st Amendment
(D) 69 th Amendment
Answer: (D) 69th Amendment
Explanation: The Constitution (Sixty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1991, inserted Articles 239AA and 239AB into the Constitution, granting Delhi special status as the “National Capital Territory of Delhi” (NCT of Delhi). This amendment provided Delhi with its own Legislative Assembly and a Council of Ministers headed by a Chief Minister, while keeping certain subjects (like police, public order, and land) under the control of the Union Government through the Lieutenant Governor. This was a significant step giving Delhi partial statehood-like status without making it a full state.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment | 69th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1991 |
| Articles inserted | Article 239AA and 239AB |
| New nomenclature | Delhi renamed as “National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCT of Delhi)” |
| Key provisions | Legislative Assembly for Delhi; Council of Ministers headed by Chief Minister |
| Subjects excluded from Delhi Assembly’s control | Public Order, Police, and Land (remain with Union Government) |
| Administrative head | Lieutenant Governor (administrator) continues to represent the Union |
| Related Act | Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act, 1991 (gives detailed operational framework) |
3. The Sixth Schedule of the Constitution of India does not provide Administration for
(A) Assam
(B) Meghalaya
(C) Tripura
(D) Manipur
Answer: (D) Manipur
Explanation: The Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, under Article 244(2) and Article 275(1), provides for the administration of tribal areas in four northeastern states: Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram. It allows for the creation of Autonomous District Councils (ADCs) and Autonomous Regional Councils to give tribal communities self-governance over land, forest, and local customs. Manipur is notably excluded from the Sixth Schedule; instead, its hill areas are governed under Article 371C, which provides for a Hill Areas Committee in the State Legislative Assembly to look after the administration of hill areas.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Governing Articles | Article 244(2) and Article 275(1) |
| States covered under Sixth Schedule | Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, Mizoram |
| State NOT covered | Manipur |
| Manipur’s special provision | Article 371C – special provision with respect to the State of Manipur (Hill Areas Committee) |
| Purpose of Sixth Schedule | Administration of tribal areas via Autonomous District Councils (ADCs) |
4. Which of the following amendments to the Constitution of India is also referred to as the ‘mini Constitution’?
(A) 38 th Amendment
(B) 42 nd Amendment
(C) 35 th Amendment
(D) 40 th Amendment
Answer: (B) 42nd Amendment
Explanation: The Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, enacted during the Emergency period under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s government, is widely known as the “Mini Constitution” because of the sheer scale and depth of changes it introduced. It amended the Preamble (adding “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity”), added Part IVA (Fundamental Duties), curtailed the powers of judicial review, extended the tenure of the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies, and made several other sweeping changes affecting the balance of power between the legislature, executive, and judiciary.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment | 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 |
| Nickname | “Mini Constitution” |
| Enacted during | National Emergency (1975–1977), under PM Indira Gandhi |
| Key changes to Preamble | Added “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity” |
| New Part added | Part IVA – Fundamental Duties (Article 51A) |
| Other major changes | Curtailed judicial review powers; extended Lok Sabha/Assembly tenure from 5 to 6 years; strengthened Directive Principles over Fundamental Rights |
| Later development | Many provisions of the 42nd Amendment were reviewed/reversed by the 43rd and 44th Amendments (1977–78) |
5. Which part of the Constitution of India describes citizenship at the commencement of the Constitution?
(A) Part I
(B) Part II
(C) Part III
(D) Part IV
Answer: (B) Part II
Explanation: Part II of the Constitution of India, comprising Articles 5 to 11, deals with the provisions relating to citizenship at the commencement of the Constitution. It defines who became citizens of India on 26th January 1950, covering categories such as persons domiciled in India, migrants from Pakistan, persons of Indian origin residing outside India, and persons who voluntarily acquired foreign citizenship. Parliament was also empowered under Article 11 to regulate citizenship by law thereafter, which led to the enactment of the Citizenship Act, 1955.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Part of Constitution | Part II |
| Articles covered | Article 5 to Article 11 |
| Subject matter | Citizenship at the commencement of the Constitution (26 January 1950) |
| Article 5 | Citizenship by domicile in India at commencement |
| Article 6 | Rights of citizenship of certain persons who migrated from Pakistan |
| Article 7 | Rights of citizenship of certain migrants to Pakistan |
| Article 8 | Rights of citizenship of certain persons of Indian origin residing outside India |
| Article 9 | Persons voluntarily acquiring citizenship of a foreign state not to be citizens |
| Article 11 | Empowers Parliament to regulate citizenship by law (led to Citizenship Act, 1955) |
6. Sanskrit is the 2 nd official language of which State in India?
(A) Karnataka
(B) Madhya Pradesh
(C) Uttarakhand
(D) Himachal Pradesh
Answer: (C) Uttarakhand
Explanation: Uttarakhand declared Sanskrit as its second official language in January 2010, alongside Hindi, which is the state’s primary official language. This decision was taken to promote and preserve Sanskrit, given the state’s historical and cultural association with ancient scriptures, temples (like those in Haridwar and Rishikesh), and traditional learning centers. Uttarakhand remains one of the very few states in India to accord Sanskrit this special official status.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| State | Uttarakhand |
| Sanskrit declared as | Second official language (alongside Hindi) |
| Year of declaration | 2010 |
| Reason | Cultural and religious significance — Uttarakhand is home to major pilgrimage sites (Haridwar, Rishikesh, Char Dham) |
| Primary official language of Uttarakhand | Hindi |
| Other facts | Uttarakhand also has a “Sanskrit village” — Jhajjar (Mohalla), Karnataka, is famous for everyday conversational use of Sanskrit, but that is different from having “official language” status |
7. The original Constitution of India was handwritten by
(A) Rafi Ahmed Kidwai
(B) Prem Behari Narain Raizada
(C) Kailash Nath Katju
(D) Kanaiyalal Maneklal Munshi
Answer: (B) Prem Behari Narain Raizada
Explanation: The original copies of the Constitution of India (both English and Hindi versions) were handwritten, not typed or printed, in a flowing italic calligraphic style. Prem Behari Narain Raizada, a renowned calligrapher, handwrote the entire English version of the Constitution using pen and ink, taking about six months to complete the task. He reportedly did not accept any payment for this work except for requesting that his and his grandfather’s names be inscribed at the end of every part/chapter of the Constitution, which was granted. The Constitution was later beautifully illustrated and decorated by artists from Shantiniketan, including Nandalal Bose.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Calligrapher (English version) | Prem Behari Narain Raizada |
| Writing style | Flowing italic calligraphic style |
| Time taken | Approximately 6 months |
| Payment | He did not accept payment; only requested his name and grandfather’s name be inscribed in every part |
| Hindi version calligrapher | Vasant Krishna Vaidya |
| Illustrations/artwork | Done by artists from Shantiniketan under the guidance of Nandalal Bose |
| Where original copies are kept | Preserved in a special helium-filled case in the Library of the Parliament of India |
8. The National Flag of Indian Union was adopted on _______.
(A) 15 th August, 1947
(B) 26 th November, 1949
(C) 22 nd July, 1947
(D) 26 th January, 1950
Answer: (C) 22nd July, 1947
Explanation: The National Flag of India, in its present tricolour form (with the Ashoka Chakra at the center instead of the earlier spinning wheel/charkha), was adopted by the Constituent Assembly of India on 22nd July, 1947 — just a few weeks before India attained independence on 15th August, 1947. The flag was designed based on the Swaraj flag of the Indian National Congress, with the charkha replaced by the Ashoka Chakra (a 24-spoke wheel) to represent the eternal wheel of law (Dharma Chakra) as a more universal and inclusive symbol for independent India.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Date of adoption | 22nd July, 1947 |
| Adopted by | Constituent Assembly of India |
| Basis of design | Swaraj Flag of Indian National Congress (designed by Pingali Venkayya) |
| Key change made | Charkha (spinning wheel) replaced with Ashoka Chakra (24-spoke wheel) |
| Colours | Saffron (top) – courage/sacrifice; White (middle) – truth/peace; Green (bottom) – fertility/growth |
| Ashoka Chakra represents | Dharma Chakra (Wheel of Law), taken from the Lion Capital of Ashoka at Sarnath |
9. The Constitution declares India to be a sovereign, socialist, democratic republic, assuring citizens of justice, equality and liberty, and endeavours to promote fraternity among them. The words “socialist” and “secular” were added to the definition in year:
(A) 1956
(B) 1976
(C) 1970
(D) 1952
Answer: (B) 1976
Explanation: The words “Socialist” and “Secular” (along with “Integrity”) were added to the Preamble of the Indian Constitution by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, enacted during the period of National Emergency under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s government. Before this amendment, the Preamble described India only as a “Sovereign Democratic Republic.” After the amendment, it now reads “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic.” This is the only amendment made to the Preamble till date.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment | 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 |
| Words added to Preamble | “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity” |
| Original Preamble wording (1950) | “Sovereign Democratic Republic” |
| Amended Preamble wording (1976 onward) | “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic” |
| Enacted during | National Emergency (1975–1977) |
| Times Preamble has been amended | Only once, in 1976 (via 42nd Amendment) |
| Related fact | 42nd Amendment is also called the “Mini Constitution” due to its extensive changes |
10. 53 rd Amendment of the Indian Constitution 1986 made full Statehood for
(A) Mizoram
(B) Tripura
(C) Manipur
(D) Meghalaya
Answer: (A) Mizoram
Explanation: The Constitution (Fifty-third Amendment) Act, 1986, inserted Article 371G into the Constitution, granting full statehood to Mizoram. This came about following the Mizo Accord (Memorandum of Settlement) signed in June 1986 between the Government of India and the Mizo National Front (MNF) leader Laldenga, which ended decades of insurgency in the region. Mizoram thus became the 23rd state of the Indian Union, effective from 20th February 1987.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment | 53rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1986 |
| Article inserted | Article 371G – Special provision with respect to the State of Mizoram |
| State granted statehood | Mizoram |
| Statehood effective date | 20th February 1987 |
| Sequence in Indian Union | Mizoram became the 23rd state of India |
| Background | Mizo Accord (1986) between Government of India and Mizo National Front (Laldenga) ending Mizo insurgency |
| Special protections under 371G | Protects Mizo customary law, religious/social practices; ownership/transfer of land in Mizoram cannot be legislated by Parliament without State Assembly’s consent |
11. The 10 th Schedule of the Indian Constitution talks about
(A) Municipalities
(B) Forms of Oaths
(C) Validation of Regulations
(D) Anti Defection Act
Answer: (D) Anti Defection Act
Explanation: The Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India, popularly known as the “Anti-Defection Law,” was added by the Constitution (Fifty-second Amendment) Act, 1985. It lays down the provisions for disqualification of Members of Parliament and State Legislatures on the grounds of defection — that is, if they voluntarily give up membership of their political party or vote/abstain contrary to the party whip without prior permission. This was introduced to curb political defections that led to government instability, especially the phenomenon popularly known as “Aaya Ram, Gaya Ram.”
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Schedule | Tenth Schedule |
| Popular name | Anti-Defection Law |
| Added by | 52nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1985 |
| Purpose | Disqualification of MPs/MLAs on grounds of defection |
| Grounds for disqualification | Voluntarily giving up party membership; voting/abstaining against party whip without permission |
| Deciding authority | Presiding Officer of the House (Speaker/Chairman) |
| Landmark case | Kihoto Hollohan vs. Zachillhu (1992) – upheld constitutional validity of the Tenth Schedule, but made the Speaker’s decision subject to judicial review |
| Famous phrase associated | “Aaya Ram, Gaya Ram” (referring to frequent political defections in Haryana in the 1960s) |
12. Which Schedule of the Constitution of India prescribes the Forms of Oaths or Affirmations ?
(A) 11 th Schedule
(B) 4 th Schedule
(C) 3 rd Schedule
(D) 5 th Schedule
Answer: (C) 3rd Schedule
Explanation: The Third Schedule of the Indian Constitution contains the various forms of Oaths or Affirmations that must be taken by different constitutional functionaries before entering upon their office. This includes oaths for Union Ministers, candidates for elections to Parliament, Members of Parliament, Judges of the Supreme Court, the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India, State Ministers, candidates for State Legislature elections, Members of State Legislature, and Judges of High Courts. Notably, the oath for the President and Governors is given directly in the Constitution’s articles (Article 60 and Article 159), not in the Third Schedule.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Schedule | Third Schedule |
| Subject matter | Forms of Oaths or Affirmations |
| Who takes these oaths | Union Ministers, MPs, Supreme Court Judges, CAG, State Ministers, MLAs, High Court Judges, election candidates |
| Notable exclusions | Oath of President (Article 60) and Governor (Article 159) are prescribed directly in the Constitution’s text, not the Third Schedule |
| Related schedules (for comparison) | Fourth Schedule – allocation of Rajya Sabha seats to States/UTs; Fifth Schedule – administration of Scheduled Areas/Tribes; Eleventh Schedule – Panchayats (73rd Amendment) |
13. How many Articles were written on the Constitution when it came into effect?
(A) 410 Articles
(B) 415 Articles
(C) 365 Articles
(D) 395 Articles
Answer: (D) 395 Articles
Explanation: When the Constitution of India was originally adopted on 26th November 1949 and came into effect on 26th January 1950, it contained 395 Articles, divided into 22 Parts, along with 8 Schedules. This made it the longest written constitution in the world at the time of its adoption. Over the years, through various amendments, the number of Articles has increased (with articles being added as sub-numbered provisions like 21A, 35A, 371A etc.), though some have also been repealed.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Original number of Articles | 395 |
| Original number of Parts | 22 |
| Original number of Schedules | 8 |
| Date of adoption | 26th November 1949 |
| Date of commencement | 26th January 1950 |
| Current status | Number of Articles has increased over time (currently around 448 Articles, 25 Parts, 12 Schedules) due to various amendments |
| World ranking | India has the longest written constitution in the world |
14. What does the 8 th Schedule of the Indian Constitution deals with?
(A) Administration of Tribal Areas
(B) Panchayat Raj
(C) Official Languages
(D) Municipalities
Answer: (C) Official Languages
Explanation: The Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution contains the list of recognized/scheduled languages of India. Originally, it had 14 languages, but over time, through various constitutional amendments (notably the 21st, 71st, and 92nd Amendments), more languages were added, bringing the current total to 22 languages. This schedule is significant for promoting and developing regional languages and is often the basis for language-related government policies, such as translation of official documents and competitive exams.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Schedule | Eighth Schedule |
| Subject matter | List of recognized/scheduled languages of India |
| Original number of languages (1950) | 14 |
| Current number of languages | 22 |
| Key amendments adding languages | 21st Amendment (1967) – added Sindhi; 71st Amendment (1992) – added Konkani, Manipuri, Nepali; 92nd Amendment (2003) – added Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, Santhali |
| Most recently added language notes | 92nd Amendment (2003) brought the total to 22 |
| Related schedules (for comparison) | Sixth Schedule – Administration of Tribal Areas (Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, Mizoram); Eleventh Schedule – Panchayats; Twelfth Schedule – Municipalities |
15. The Preamble of the Indian Constitution was inspired by the Preamble of the Constitution of which country?
(A) U.S. Constitution
(B) Swiss Constitution
(C) British Constitution
(D) Constitution of Canada
Answer: (A) U.S. Constitution
Explanation: The idea and structure of having a Preamble to the Constitution — a brief introductory statement setting out the guiding principles, purpose, and philosophy of the document — was borrowed from the Constitution of the United States of America. The US Constitution’s Preamble begins with “We the People of the United States…” and the Indian Constitution’s Preamble similarly begins with “WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA…”, reflecting that ultimate sovereignty and authority rest with the people of India.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Source of inspiration | United States (US) Constitution |
| Opening phrase of Indian Preamble | “WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA…” |
| Opening phrase of US Preamble | “We the People of the United States…” |
| Significance of “We the People” | Establishes that sovereignty and authority of the Constitution flow from the people of India |
| Constitutional status of Preamble | Considered the “Soul” of the Constitution; part of the Basic Structure (as held in Kesavananda Bharati case, 1973) |
| Amendability of Preamble | Can be amended, but the Basic Structure/fundamental philosophy cannot be altered (only amended once so far — 42nd Amendment, 1976) |
16. At which of its session, did the Congress officially accept the ‘Socialistic pattern of Society’?
(A) Bombay Session of 1953
(B) Avadi Session of 1955
(C) Calcutta Session of 1957
(D) Nagpur Session of 1959
Answer: (B) Avadi Session of 1955
Explanation: At the Avadi Session of the Indian National Congress, held in January 1955 near Chennai (Madras), the Congress officially adopted the goal of a “Socialistic Pattern of Society” as its objective for economic and social development. This resolution laid the ideological foundation for the country’s subsequent Five-Year Plans (particularly the Second Five-Year Plan, formulated under P.C. Mahalanobis) to focus on public sector-led industrialization, planned economic development, and reduction of economic disparities, while still retaining a mixed economy framework.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Session | Avadi Session, Indian National Congress |
| Year | 1955 |
| Location | Avadi, near Madras (now Chennai) |
| Resolution adopted | “Socialistic Pattern of Society” as the goal of Indian economic policy |
| Impact | Provided ideological basis for the Second Five-Year Plan (1956–61), emphasizing heavy industries and public sector |
| Key economist associated with subsequent planning | P.C. Mahalanobis (architect of the Second Five-Year Plan model) |
| Related later development | The word “Socialist” was added to the Constitution’s Preamble only later, via the 42nd Amendment in 1976 — these are two distinct events, though thematically connected |
17. Who among the following gave the following statement about the Indian Constitution? ‘Indian Constitution strikes a good balance between extreme rigidity and too much flexibility.’
(A) B. R. Ambedkar
(B) M.V. Pylee
(C) Alexandrowicz
(D) K.C. Wheare
Answer: (A) B. R. Ambedkar
Explanation: Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, the Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Constituent Assembly, made this observation regarding the amendment process of the Indian Constitution under Article 368. He emphasized that the Constitution’s framers deliberately designed a flexible-cum-rigid amendment procedure — some provisions can be amended by a simple parliamentary majority, others require a special majority, and a few additionally need ratification by at least half the state legislatures. This blended approach ensures the Constitution remains adaptable to changing needs while safeguarding its core federal and fundamental structure from being changed too easily.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Quoted person | Dr. B. R. Ambedkar |
| Context | Discussing the amendment procedure under Article 368 |
| Core idea | The Indian Constitution balances rigidity (needed for stability) and flexibility (needed for adaptability) |
| Three types of amendment procedures | (1) Simple majority (like ordinary law); (2) Special majority (2/3rd of members present and voting + majority of total membership); (3) Special majority + ratification by half the states (for federal provisions) |
| Governing Article | Article 368 |
18. From which country was the idea of ‘Concurrent List’ in the Indian Constitution borrowed?
(A) Japan
(B) United States
(C) Australia
(D) China
Answer: (C) Australia
Explanation: The concept of the Concurrent List — a list of subjects on which both the Union (Central) and State Governments can legislate — was borrowed from the Australian Constitution. Under the Indian Constitution’s Seventh Schedule, the Concurrent List (List III) contains subjects such as education, forests, marriage and divorce, criminal law, and economic and social planning, where both Parliament and State Legislatures have concurrent power to make laws. In case of a conflict between a Union law and a State law on the same subject, the Union law generally prevails (as per Article 254), unless the State law has received Presidential assent.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Concept | Concurrent List (List III) |
| Source country | Australia |
| Location in Constitution | Seventh Schedule, List III |
| Total lists in Seventh Schedule | Union List (List I), State List (List II), Concurrent List (List III) |
| Governing conflict-resolution Article | Article 254 – Union law prevails over State law in case of repugnancy, unless State law has received Presidential assent |
| Sample subjects in Concurrent List | Education, Forests, Marriage & Divorce, Criminal Law & Procedure, Economic & Social Planning, Trade Unions |
19. How many schedules are there in the Indian Constitution?
(A) 22
(B) 17
(C) 97
(D) 12
Answer: (D) 12
Explanation: The Constitution of India currently has 12 Schedules. Originally, when the Constitution was adopted in 1950, it had only 8 Schedules. Over time, through various constitutional amendments, additional schedules were added — the Ninth Schedule (by the 1st Amendment, 1951), the Tenth Schedule (Anti-Defection Law, by the 52nd Amendment, 1985), the Eleventh Schedule (Panchayats, by the 73rd Amendment, 1992), and the Twelfth Schedule (Municipalities, by the 74th Amendment, 1992), bringing the total to 12.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Current number of Schedules | 12 |
| Original number of Schedules (1950) | 8 |
| Ninth Schedule added by | 1st Amendment Act, 1951 (protects certain laws from judicial review) |
| Tenth Schedule added by | 52nd Amendment Act, 1985 (Anti-Defection Law) |
| Eleventh Schedule added by | 73rd Amendment Act, 1992 (Panchayati Raj Institutions – 29 subjects) |
| Twelfth Schedule added by | 74th Amendment Act, 1992 (Municipalities – 18 subjects) |
20. In which year did Goa became the 25th State of India ?
(A) 1987
(B) 1988
(C) 1989
(D) 1990
Answer: (A) 1987
Explanation: Goa, along with Daman and Diu, was liberated from Portuguese colonial rule in 1961 and was initially administered as a Union Territory. On 30th May 1987, through the Goa, Daman and Diu Reorganisation Act, 1987, Goa was granted full statehood and became the 25th State of the Indian Union. Daman and Diu, on the other hand, continued as a separate Union Territory after the bifurcation.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Event | Goa attained full statehood |
| Year | 1987 (30th May 1987) |
| Governing Act | Goa, Daman and Diu Reorganisation Act, 1987 |
| Sequence in Indian Union | Goa became the 25th State of India |
| Prior status | Union Territory (along with Daman and Diu) since liberation from Portuguese rule in 1961 |
| Bifurcation | Daman and Diu remained a separate Union Territory after Goa’s statehood |
| Related fact | Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh also attained statehood around the same period — Mizoram on 20 February 1987 (23rd state), Arunachal Pradesh on 20 February 1987 (24th state), and Goa shortly after on 30 May 1987 (25th state) |
21. Which schedule contains ‘Forms of Oath and Affirmations’ ?
(A) Eleventh Schedule
(B) Fourth Schedule
(C) Third Schedule
(D) Fifth Schedule
Answer: (C) Third Schedule
Explanation: This is the same concept as tested earlier in this paper (Question 12). The Third Schedule of the Indian Constitution lays down the various forms of Oaths or Affirmations to be taken by constitutional functionaries — including Union Ministers, candidates and members of Parliament, Judges of the Supreme Court, the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India, State Ministers, candidates and members of State Legislatures, and Judges of High Courts — before assuming their respective offices.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Schedule | Third Schedule |
| Subject matter | Forms of Oaths or Affirmations |
| Functionaries covered | Union Ministers, MPs, Supreme Court Judges, CAG, State Ministers, MLAs, High Court Judges |
| Notable exclusions | President’s oath (Article 60) and Governor’s oath (Article 159) are given directly in the Constitution’s text, not in the Third Schedule |
| Related schedules (for comparison) | Fourth Schedule – Allocation of Rajya Sabha seats to States/UTs; Fifth Schedule – Administration of Scheduled Areas & Scheduled Tribes; Eleventh Schedule – Panchayats (73rd Amendment) |
22. The States were reorganized in the year 1956 mainly on the basis of which criteria?
(A) External and internal security
(B) Administration facility
(C) Linguistic and cultural uniformity
(D) Geographic similarity and resource allocation
Answer: (C) Linguistic and cultural uniformity
Explanation: The States Reorganisation Act, 1956, was enacted based on the recommendations of the States Reorganisation Commission (SRC), headed by Fazl Ali, along with members H.N. Kunzru and K.M. Panikkar. The Commission recommended that state boundaries be redrawn primarily on the basis of linguistic and cultural uniformity, so that people speaking the same language and sharing a common cultural heritage could be governed together. This was a response to widespread demands for linguistic states, most notably triggered by the agitation for a separate Andhra state (leading to the formation of Andhra Pradesh in 1953, following the fast unto death of Potti Sriramulu).
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Act | States Reorganisation Act, 1956 |
| Basis of reorganization | Linguistic and cultural uniformity |
| Commission | States Reorganisation Commission (SRC), 1953 |
| Chairman of SRC | Fazl Ali |
| Other members of SRC | H. N. Kunzru, K. M. Panikkar |
| Trigger event | Formation of Andhra State (1953) after Potti Sriramulu’s fast-unto-death death, demanding a Telugu-speaking state |
| Number of states/UTs created (1956) | Reorganized India into 14 states and 6 Union Territories |
| Related earlier commission | Dhar Commission (1948) and JVP Committee (1948–49) initially opposed linguistic reorganization, but public pressure led to the SRC being formed |
23. Which Amendment Act made Sikkim a full-fledged State of India ?
(A) 34 th Constitutional Amendment Act
(B) 35 th Constitutional Amendment Act
(C) 36 th Constitutional Amendment Act
(D) 37 th Constitutional Amendment Act
Answer: (C) 36th Constitutional Amendment Act
Explanation: Sikkim’s integration with India occurred in two stages. First, the 35th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1974, gave Sikkim the status of an “Associate State” of India by inserting Article 2A and the Tenth Schedule (a different, now-repealed Tenth Schedule dealing with Sikkim’s terms of association, not to be confused with today’s Anti-Defection Tenth Schedule). Following a referendum in Sikkim in April 1975, in which the people voted overwhelmingly to merge with India and abolish the monarchy, the 36th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1975, made Sikkim a full-fledged State of the Indian Union — the 22nd state — by amending Article 371F and omitting Article 2A along with the earlier Tenth Schedule provisions.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment granting full statehood | 36th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1975 |
| Prior step: Associate State status | Granted by 35th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1974 (inserted Article 2A) |
| Referendum | Held in April 1975; Sikkimese people voted to merge with India and abolish monarchy |
| Article dealing with Sikkim’s special provisions | Article 371F |
| Sequence in Indian Union | Sikkim became the 22nd State of India |
| Political context | End of the Chogyal (monarchy) rule in Sikkim |
24. Which Act granted Statehood to Arunachal Pradesh?
(A) Constitution Act, 1981
(B) Constitution Act, 1987
(C) Government of India Act, 1981
(D) Government of India Act, 1987
Answer: (B) Constitution Act, 1987
Explanation: Arunachal Pradesh, formerly known as the North-East Frontier Agency (NEFA), was granted the status of a Union Territory in 1972. It was subsequently elevated to full statehood through the State of Arunachal Pradesh Act, 1986 (also referred to in some sources loosely as a “Constitution Act, 1987” due to it coming into effect on 20th February 1987). Arunachal Pradesh became the 24th State of the Indian Union on 20th February 1987, the same day Mizoram also attained statehood.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Governing Act | State of Arunachal Pradesh Act, 1986 (effective from 20 Feb 1987) |
| Former name | North-East Frontier Agency (NEFA) |
| Status before statehood | Union Territory (from 1972) |
| Statehood effective date | 20th February 1987 |
| Sequence in Indian Union | 24th State of India |
| Same-day statehood | Mizoram also became a state (23rd) on the same date, 20 Feb 1987 |
25. From which country was the idea of concurrent list borrowed in India?
(A) Japan
(B) United States of America
(C) Australia
(D) China
Answer: (C) Australia
Explanation: The concept of the Concurrent List — where both the Union Parliament and State Legislatures can make laws on the same subjects listed in List III of the Seventh Schedule — was borrowed from the Australian Constitution. Subjects like education, forests, criminal law, marriage and divorce, and economic and social planning fall under this list. In the event of a conflict between central and state laws on a concurrent subject, the central law generally prevails under Article 254, unless the state law has received the President’s assent.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Concept | Concurrent List (List III) |
| Source country | Australia |
| Location in Constitution | Seventh Schedule, List III |
| Three lists in Seventh Schedule | Union List (List I), State List (List II), Concurrent List (List III) |
| Conflict-resolution Article | Article 254 – Union law prevails, unless State law received Presidential assent |
| Sample subjects | Education, Forests, Marriage & Divorce, Criminal Law, Economic & Social Planning |
26. Which among the following languages was included in the eighth schedule by Constitution (21st ) amendment Bill on 10 April 1967?
(A) Assamese
(B) Sindhi
(C) Gujarati
(D) Konkani
Answer: (B) Sindhi
Explanation: The Constitution (Twenty-first Amendment) Act, 1967, added Sindhi to the Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, raising the total number of scheduled languages from 14 to 15 at that time. This inclusion was significant because Sindhi was the language of the Sindhi-speaking community that migrated to India after Partition (since Sindh became part of Pakistan), and it did not correspond to any specific Indian state, unlike most other scheduled languages.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment | 21st Constitutional Amendment Act, 1967 |
| Language added | Sindhi |
| Number of languages before this amendment | 14 |
| Number of languages after this amendment | 15 |
| Special note about Sindhi | Not tied to any specific Indian state (unlike most Eighth Schedule languages); spoken by the Sindhi community that migrated from Sindh (now in Pakistan) after Partition |
| Other Eighth Schedule expansion amendments | 71st Amendment (1992) – added Konkani, Manipuri, Nepali (making total 18); 92nd Amendment (2003) – added Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, Santhali (making total 22) |
| Current total languages in 8th Schedule | 22 |
27. Who was elected as the Permanent President of the Constituent Assembly ?
(A) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(B) B. R. Ambedkar
(C) Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel
(D) Frank Anthony
Answer: (A) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
Explanation: Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the permanent President (Chairman) of the Constituent Assembly of India on 11th December 1946, two days after the Assembly’s first session on 9th December 1946. He presided over the Assembly throughout the constitution-making process, which took nearly three years to complete, and later went on to become the first President of independent India. Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha had earlier served as the temporary/provisional Chairman at the very first sitting on 9th December 1946.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Permanent President of Constituent Assembly | Dr. Rajendra Prasad |
| Date elected | 11th December 1946 |
| First session date | 9th December 1946 |
| Temporary/interim Chairman (first sitting only) | Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha |
| Later role of Dr. Rajendra Prasad | First President of independent India |
| Chairman of the Drafting Committee (different role) | Dr. B. R. Ambedkar |
| Total time taken by Constituent Assembly | Approx. 2 years, 11 months, and 18 days (commonly rounded to “about 3 years”) |
28. Which Right was not taken from the British Constitution in the Indian Constitution?
(A) Freedom of Press
(B) Right to Vote
(C) Fundamental Rights
(D) Educational Rights
Answer: (C) Fundamental Rights
Explanation: The concept of Fundamental Rights (Part III of the Indian Constitution) was borrowed from the Constitution of the United States of America, particularly the American Bill of Rights, and not from the British Constitution. This is because the British Constitution is largely unwritten and uncodified, relying on parliamentary sovereignty and conventions rather than a codified bill of enforceable fundamental rights. In contrast, several other features of the Indian parliamentary and legal system — such as the concept of the Rule of Law, parliamentary form of government, single citizenship, and law-making procedures — were indeed borrowed from Britain.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Feature not borrowed from Britain | Fundamental Rights (Part III) |
| Actual source of Fundamental Rights | United States of America (Bill of Rights) |
| Reason Britain couldn’t be the source | British Constitution is unwritten/uncodified; relies on parliamentary sovereignty, not an enforceable bill of rights |
| Features actually borrowed from Britain | Parliamentary form of government, Rule of Law, Single citizenship, Legislative procedure, Prerogative writs, Bicameralism (partly), Cabinet system |
| Features borrowed from USA (for comparison) | Fundamental Rights, Judicial Review, Independence of Judiciary, Impeachment procedure of President, Post of Vice-President |
29. The original Constitution of India had how many Articles and Schedules?
(A) 392 Articles and 7 Schedules
(B) 395 Articles and 8 Schedules
(C) 395 Articles and 6 Schedules
(D) 396 Articles and 4 Schedules
Answer: (B) 395 Articles and 8 Schedules
Explanation: When the Constitution of India was originally adopted on 26th November 1949 and came into force on 26th January 1950, it contained 395 Articles divided into 22 Parts, along with 8 Schedules. This is a companion fact to Question 13 in this same paper, which asked specifically about the number of Articles. Over subsequent decades, through various amendments, both the number of Articles (via insertions like 21A, 35A) and Schedules (Ninth through Twelfth added later) have increased.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Original number of Articles | 395 |
| Original number of Parts | 22 |
| Original number of Schedules | 8 |
| Date of adoption | 26th November 1949 |
| Date of commencement | 26th January 1950 |
| Current number of Schedules | 12 (after Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, Twelfth added via later amendments) |
| Current number of Articles (approx.) | Around 448 (due to insertions/deletions over time) |
30. In India the concept of single citizenship is adopted from
(A) The French Constitution
(B) The Swiss Constitution
(C) The Constitution of United States of America
(D) The British Constitution
Answer: (D) The British Constitution
Explanation: India follows the concept of “Single Citizenship,” meaning that every Indian citizen, irrespective of the state they belong to or reside in, is a citizen of India as a whole — there is no separate state citizenship as seen in countries like the USA (which follows “Dual Citizenship,” where a person is a citizen of both the country and the specific state). This concept of single citizenship in India was borrowed from the British Constitution, and it aims to promote unity and integrity of the nation, avoiding regional discrimination among citizens across different states.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Concept | Single Citizenship |
| Source country | United Kingdom (British Constitution) |
| Meaning | Every Indian is a citizen of India only, not separately of any state |
| Contrast example | USA follows Dual Citizenship — citizens hold both national citizenship and separate state citizenship |
| Purpose in India | Promotes national unity and integrity; avoids regional bias/discrimination |
| Governing constitutional provisions | Part II (Articles 5–11) deals with citizenship at commencement; Citizenship Act, 1955 governs subsequent regulation |
| Other features borrowed from Britain (for comparison) | Parliamentary system, Rule of Law, Cabinet system, Bicameralism, Prerogative writs |
WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper – 2022
1. Which is the correct sequence in the Preamble of the Constitution of India ?
(A) Sovereign, Secular, Socialist, Democratic, Republic
(B) Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Republic, Democratic
(C) Sovereign, Secular, Socialist, Republic, Democratic
(D) Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic, Republic
Answer: (D) Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic, Republic
Explanation: The Preamble to the Constitution of India, as amended by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976, describes India as a “SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC.” This is the exact and fixed sequence in which these descriptive words appear in the Preamble, and the order matters for exam purposes. Originally (before 1976), the Preamble only described India as “Sovereign Democratic Republic” — the words “Socialist” and “Secular” were inserted in between “Sovereign” and “Democratic” by the 42nd Amendment.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Correct sequence in Preamble | Sovereign → Socialist → Secular → Democratic → Republic |
| Amendment that fixed this sequence | 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 |
| Original (1950) sequence | Sovereign → Democratic → Republic |
| Words inserted in 1976 | “Socialist” and “Secular” (placed between “Sovereign” and “Democratic”) |
| Word “Integrity” also added in 1976 | Yes, in the phrase “Unity and Integrity of the Nation” (Fraternity clause) |
2. “Economic Justice” as one of the objectives of the constitution of India has been provided in
(A) Preamble and Fundamental Rights
(B) Preamble and Directive Principles
(C) Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles
(D) Preamble, Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles
Answer: (B) Preamble and Directive Principles
Explanation: The concept of “Economic Justice” appears explicitly in the Preamble to the Constitution of India, which resolves to secure to all citizens “Justice, social, economic and political.” This objective is further elaborated and given concrete shape through the Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV), particularly Articles 38 and 39, which direct the State to strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing a social order in which justice — social, economic, and political — informs all institutions of national life, and to ensure equitable distribution of resources and prevention of concentration of wealth. Fundamental Rights (Part III), on the other hand, primarily deal with civil and political liberties, not economic justice per se.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Where “Economic Justice” appears | Preamble and Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV) |
| Preamble reference | “Justice, social, economic and political” |
| Key DPSP Articles related to Economic Justice | Article 38 (social order for justice); Article 39 (equitable distribution of resources, prevention of wealth concentration) |
| Why NOT Fundamental Rights | Part III primarily protects civil/political liberties (equality, freedom, life & liberty) — not explicitly economic justice as a directive goal |
| Part dealing with DPSP | Part IV (Articles 36–51) |
| DPSP source of inspiration | Irish Constitution |
3. How many scheduled languages are there in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution of India ?
(A) 12
(B) 17
(C) 22
(D) 24
Answer: (C) 22
Explanation: The Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution currently contains 22 scheduled languages. It originally had 14 languages in 1950. Over the years, several amendments added more languages: the 21st Amendment (1967) added Sindhi (making it 15); the 71st Amendment (1992) added Konkani, Manipuri, and Nepali (making it 18); and the 92nd Amendment (2003) added Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, and Santhali (making it 22, the current total).
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Current number of scheduled languages | 22 |
| Original number (1950) | 14 |
| 21st Amendment (1967) | Added Sindhi → total became 15 |
| 71st Amendment (1992) | Added Konkani, Manipuri, Nepali → total became 18 |
| 92nd Amendment (2003) | Added Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, Santhali → total became 22 (current) |
4. How many members were there in the Constituent Assembly ?
(A) 389
(B) 192
(C) 289
(D) 292
Answer: (A) 389
Explanation: The Constituent Assembly of India, as originally constituted under the Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946, was to have 389 members in total. Of these, 292 members were to be elected from the British Indian provinces, 4 members from the Chief Commissioner’s provinces, and 93 members were to represent the Princely States. However, after the Partition of India in 1947 and the withdrawal of Muslim League members (who went to Pakistan’s Constituent Assembly), the actual strength of the Assembly that framed the Constitution was reduced to 299 members.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Original total strength (as per Cabinet Mission Plan, 1946) | 389 |
| Break-up of original 389 | 292 from British Indian provinces + 4 from Chief Commissioner’s provinces + 93 from Princely States |
| Strength after Partition (1947) | Reduced to 299 (due to withdrawal of Muslim League members who went to Pakistan) |
| Basis of formation | Cabinet Mission Plan, 1946 |
5. Who was the advisor of the Constituent Assembly ?
(A) B. R. Ambedkar
(B) B. N. Rao
(C) Alldai Krishnaswamy
(D) T. T. Krishnamachari
Answer: (B) B. N. Rao
Explanation: Sir Benegal Narsing Rau (B. N. Rau) served as the Constitutional Advisor to the Constituent Assembly of India. He played a crucial behind-the-scenes role in the constitution-making process by preparing the initial draft of the Constitution based on the discussions and decisions of the various committees, before it was handed over to the Drafting Committee headed by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar for detailed scrutiny and finalization. B. N. Rau also traveled to several countries to study their constitutions before drafting the initial version, and he later became a judge at the International Court of Justice.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Constitutional Advisor | Sir Benegal Narsing Rau (B. N. Rau) |
| Role | Prepared the original/initial draft of the Constitution before it went to the Drafting Committee |
| Chairman of Drafting Committee (different role) | Dr. B. R. Ambedkar |
| Later career | Became a judge at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) |
| Preparatory work | Studied constitutions of various countries before drafting India’s initial draft |
| Other notable members mentioned in options | Alladi Krishnaswamy Ayyar and T. T. Krishnamachari were both members of the Drafting Committee, not the Constitutional Advisor |
6. The Objective Resolution in the Constituent Assembly was moved by
(A) Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru
(B) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(C) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(D) Lord Mountbatten
Answer: (A) Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru
Explanation: The Objective Resolution was moved by Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru in the Constituent Assembly on 13th December 1946 and was adopted on 22nd January 1947. This resolution laid down the fundamental philosophy and guiding principles for the framing of the Constitution — declaring India to be an independent sovereign republic, guaranteeing justice, equality, and freedom to all its people, and providing for adequate safeguards for minorities and backward classes. The Objective Resolution later formed the basis of the Preamble to the Constitution.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Moved by | Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru |
| Date moved | 13th December 1946 |
| Date adopted | 22nd January 1947 |
| Significance | Laid down the basic philosophy and objectives of the Constitution; became the basis of the Preamble |
| Key elements of the resolution | India as an Independent Sovereign Republic; Justice, equality, and freedom for all; safeguards for minorities and backward/tribal areas |
7. The ideals of “liberty, equality and fraternity” in the Preamble of the Constitution of India is inspired by
(A) Russian revolution
(B) French revolution
(C) Marxian thoughts
(D) Gandhian thoughts
Answer: (B) French revolution
Explanation: The trio of ideals — “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity” — enshrined in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution was directly inspired by the French Revolution (1789), whose famous slogan was “Liberté, égalité, fraternité” (Liberty, Equality, Fraternity). These three ideals became a cornerstone of modern democratic and republican thought worldwide, and the framers of the Indian Constitution consciously borrowed this triad to reflect India’s own commitment to individual freedom, social and legal equality, and a sense of common brotherhood among its diverse population.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Source of inspiration | French Revolution (1789) |
| Original French slogan | “Liberté, égalité, fraternité” |
| Where it appears in Indian Constitution | Preamble |
| Meaning of “Liberty” in Preamble | Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith, and worship |
| Meaning of “Equality” in Preamble | Equality of status and opportunity |
| Meaning of “Fraternity” in Preamble | Assuring dignity of the individual and unity/integrity of the nation |
8. The Fundamental Duties in the Constitution of India were adopted from
(A) American Constitution
(B) Russian Constitution
(C) Canadian Constitution
(D) French Constitution
Answer: (B) Russian Constitution
Explanation: The concept of Fundamental Duties, incorporated in Part IVA (Article 51A) of the Indian Constitution by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976, was borrowed from the Constitution of the erstwhile Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR/Russia). This provision was added on the recommendation of the Swaran Singh Committee, which was set up to suggest amendments to the Constitution during the Emergency period. Originally, there were 10 Fundamental Duties; an 11th duty (relating to the duty of parents/guardians to provide education to children aged 6–14 years) was added later by the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Concept | Fundamental Duties |
| Source country | Russia (erstwhile USSR) |
| Part & Article | Part IVA, Article 51A |
| Introduced by | 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 |
| Recommending committee | Swaran Singh Committee |
| Original number of duties | 10 |
| Current number of duties | 11 |
| 11th duty added by | 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002 (duty to provide education to children aged 6–14 years) |
9. The Constitution of India adopted the federal system from the Act of
(A) 1919
(B) 1935
(C) 1947
(D) 1909
Answer: (B) 1935
Explanation: The federal scheme of government in the Indian Constitution — including the distribution of powers between the Centre and States through the Union List, State List, and Concurrent List, as well as many administrative and structural features — was substantially borrowed from the Government of India Act, 1935. This Act had itself proposed an All-India Federation (which never came fully into force due to the reluctance of Princely States to join), but many of its provisions relating to federal structure, provincial autonomy, and administrative details were retained and adapted by the framers of the Indian Constitution.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Source Act for federal system | Government of India Act, 1935 |
| Features borrowed from GoI Act, 1935 | Federal scheme, distribution of powers (Union/State/Concurrent Lists — indirectly), office of Governor, judiciary structure, Public Service Commissions, emergency provisions |
| Why GoI Act 1935’s federation didn’t fully materialize | Princely States refused to join the proposed All-India Federation |
| Other colonial Acts (for comparison) | Government of India Act, 1919 – introduced Dyarchy in provinces; Indian Councils Act, 1909 (Morley-Minto Reforms) – introduced separate electorates; Indian Independence Act, 1947 – granted independence and partition |
10. The word “secularism” was added to the Preamble of the Constitution of India by which amendment?
(A) 40th
(B) 42nd
(C) 44th
(D) 46th
Answer: (B) 42nd
Explanation: The word “Secular” was inserted into the Preamble of the Indian Constitution by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976. This amendment changed the description of India from “Sovereign Democratic Republic” to “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic,” explicitly affirming India’s secular character — meaning the State treats all religions equally and maintains no official state religion, while allowing individuals the freedom to practice, propagate, and profess any religion of their choice.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment | 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 |
| Word added | “Secular” (along with “Socialist” and “Integrity”) |
| Original Preamble wording | “Sovereign Democratic Republic” |
| Amended Preamble wording | “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic” |
| Meaning of secularism in Indian context | State has no official religion; treats all religions equally; ensures freedom of religion for all citizens (Articles 25–28) |
| Enacted during | National Emergency (1975–77), under PM Indira Gandhi |
| Related constitutional Articles on religion | Articles 25–28 (Right to Freedom of Religion, Part III) |
11. The Concurrent list in the Constitution of India was adopted from
(A) Australia
(B) Canada
(C) Russia
(D) UK
Answer: (A) Australia
Explanation: The Concurrent List (List III in the Seventh Schedule) — which allows both the Union Parliament and State Legislatures to legislate on the same subjects such as education, forests, marriage and divorce, and criminal law — was borrowed from the Australian Constitution. This feature enables flexibility in governance by allowing states to legislate according to local conditions while the Union can ensure uniformity where necessary; in case of a conflict, the Union law generally prevails under Article 254, unless the State law has received the President’s assent.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Concept | Concurrent List (List III) |
| Source country | Australia |
| Location | Seventh Schedule, List III |
| Conflict-resolution provision | Article 254 – Union law prevails, unless State law has received Presidential assent |
| Sample subjects | Education, Forests, Marriage & Divorce, Criminal Law & Procedure, Economic & Social Planning |
| Other borrowed features from Canada (for comparison) | Quasi-federal system, strong Centre, residuary powers with the Union (Canada is a common distractor for federal-related questions) |
12. The Constituent Assembly was set according to the proposals of
(A) The Cripps Mission
(B) The Cabinet Mission
(C) The Mountbatten Plan
(D) None of the Above
Answer: (B) The Cabinet Mission
Explanation: The Constituent Assembly of India was constituted in accordance with the proposals put forth by the Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946. The Cabinet Mission, comprising three British Cabinet ministers — Lord Pethick-Lawrence, Sir Stafford Cripps, and A.V. Alexander — visited India in 1946 to discuss and formulate a plan for the transfer of power. It proposed a scheme for electing members to a Constituent Assembly through indirect elections by the members of the Provincial Legislative Assemblies, along with representation from the Princely States. This led to the formation of the 389-member Constituent Assembly, which first met on 9th December 1946.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Basis of Constituent Assembly’s formation | Cabinet Mission Plan, 1946 |
| Members of Cabinet Mission | Lord Pethick-Lawrence, Sir Stafford Cripps, A. V. Alexander |
| Original Constituent Assembly strength | 389 members |
| Method of election | Indirect election by Provincial Legislative Assembly members + nomination from Princely States |
| First meeting date | 9th December 1946 |
| Cripps Mission (different, earlier event) | 1942 mission led by Sir Stafford Cripps alone, proposing Dominion Status — rejected by Congress (“post-dated cheque” remark by Gandhi); did NOT create the Constituent Assembly |
| Mountbatten Plan (different, later event) | June 1947 plan that led to Partition and transfer of power, not the formation of the Constituent Assembly |
13. The Constitution of India describes India as a
(A) Federation of Independent States
(B) Union of States
(C) Quasi federation
(D) Dominion of States
Answer: (B) Union of States
Explanation: This is the same concept tested earlier as Question 1 in the WBCS 2023 paper. Article 1 of the Constitution of India states, “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.” The framers deliberately chose the term “Union” instead of “Federation” to emphasize that the Indian federation was not formed by an agreement between the states (unlike the USA), and that no state has the right to secede from the Union — making it indestructible, even though it functions with a federal structure and division of powers between the Centre and States.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Constitutional Article | Article 1 |
| Exact phrase | “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States” |
| Reason for “Union” over “Federation” | Indicates the federation was not formed by agreement among states; no state can secede |
| Explained by | Dr. B. R. Ambedkar in Constituent Assembly debates |
| Scholarly description of India’s federal nature | “Quasi-federal” (a term coined by K. C. Wheare) — this is a scholarly characterization, NOT the constitutional wording itself |
| Contrast with USA | US federation formed via voluntary agreement of independent, sovereign states |
14. The word “procedure established by law” in the Constitution of India have been borrowed from
(A) The Constitution of UK
(B) The Constitution of USA
(C) The French Constitution
(D) The Constitution of Japan
Answer: (D) The Constitution of Japan
Explanation: The phrase “procedure established by law,” found in Article 21 of the Indian Constitution (Right to Life and Personal Liberty), was borrowed from the Constitution of Japan. This concept means that a person can be deprived of their life or personal liberty only through a procedure laid down by a validly enacted law, but it does not require that law to necessarily be “fair, just, and reasonable” (unlike the American doctrine of “due process of law,” which allows courts to examine both the substance and procedure of the law). Over time, through judicial interpretation — most notably in the Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978) case — the Indian judiciary has infused elements of due process into Article 21, requiring that the “procedure” itself be fair, just, and reasonable.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Phrase | “Procedure established by law” |
| Source country | Japan |
| Constitutional Article | Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) |
| Contrasting American doctrine | “Due Process of Law” — allows courts to review both substance and procedure of law |
| Landmark case expanding Article 21 | Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978) — introduced due-process-like standards despite the original “procedure established by law” wording |
| Effect of Maneka Gandhi case | Procedure must now be “fair, just, and reasonable,” effectively narrowing the gap between the two doctrines |
15. Who was the Chairman of the Constitution Drafting Committee ?
(A) Jawaharlal Nehru
(B) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(C) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(D) Sardar Vallabhai Patel
Answer: (B) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
Explanation: Dr. B. R. Ambedkar was appointed as the Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Constituent Assembly, which was constituted on 29th August 1947. This committee was responsible for scrutinizing the draft Constitution prepared by the Constitutional Advisor (B. N. Rau) and preparing the final draft for consideration and adoption by the Constituent Assembly. Due to his pivotal role in shaping the Constitution’s final form, Dr. Ambedkar is widely regarded as the “Father of the Indian Constitution” or the “Chief Architect of the Indian Constitution.”
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Chairman of Drafting Committee | Dr. B. R. Ambedkar |
| Date Drafting Committee constituted | 29th August 1947 |
| Total members of Drafting Committee | 7 (including Ambedkar) |
| Other members of Drafting Committee | N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar, Alladi Krishnaswamy Ayyar, Dr. K. M. Munshi, Syed Mohammad Saadullah, N. Madhava Rau (replaced B.L. Mitter), T. T. Krishnamachari (replaced D.P. Khaitan) |
| Popular title given to Ambedkar | “Father of the Indian Constitution” / “Chief Architect of the Indian Constitution” |
| Permanent President of Constituent Assembly (different role) | Dr. Rajendra Prasad |
| Constitutional Advisor (different role) | B. N. Rau |
16. Which of the following is not a feature of the Constitution of India ?
(A) It is democratic
(B) It is republic
(C) It is federal
(D) It is presidential
Answer: (D) It is presidential
Explanation: India follows a Parliamentary form of government, not a Presidential system. In a parliamentary system, the executive (Council of Ministers headed by the Prime Minister) is drawn from and remains responsible to the legislature (Parliament), and can be removed through a vote of no-confidence. This is in contrast to a presidential system (like the USA), where the executive (President) is elected separately from the legislature, serves a fixed term, and is not collectively responsible to the legislature. India is indeed democratic (government by the people), republic (elected Head of State, i.e., the President, rather than a hereditary monarch), and federal (division of powers between Centre and States) — but definitely not presidential.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| India’s system of government | Parliamentary (not Presidential) |
| Source of parliamentary system | British Constitution |
| Key feature of parliamentary system | Executive (PM & Council of Ministers) is drawn from and responsible to the Legislature (Lok Sabha) |
| Key feature of presidential system (for contrast) | Executive (President) elected separately, fixed term, not responsible to legislature (e.g., USA) |
| Why India is “Republic” | Head of State (President) is elected, not hereditary (unlike UK’s monarchy) |
| Why India is “Federal” (with unitary bias) | Division of powers between Union and States via Union, State, and Concurrent Lists |
17. The word “socialist” was added to the Preamble of the Constitution of India by which amendment?
(A) 44th
(B) 27th
(C) 21st
(D) 42nd
Answer: (D) 42nd
Explanation: The word “Socialist” was inserted into the Preamble of the Indian Constitution by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, along with the words “Secular” and “Integrity.” This amendment changed the Preamble’s description of India from “Sovereign Democratic Republic” to “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic,” reflecting the State’s commitment to reducing economic inequalities and pursuing a welfare-oriented, mixed-economy model, without necessarily adopting a purely communist or rigid state-controlled economic structure.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment | 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 |
| Word added | “Socialist” (along with “Secular” and “Integrity”) |
| Original Preamble wording | “Sovereign Democratic Republic” |
| Amended Preamble wording | “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic” |
| Indian “Socialism” interpretation | Democratic socialism — a mixed economy blending public and private sectors, welfare state, and reduction of inequality; not rigid state ownership like Communism |
| Enacted during | National Emergency (1975–77), PM Indira Gandhi’s government |
WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper – 2021
1. Which is the ‘Soul’ of the Indian Constitution ?
(A) Fundamental Rights
(B) Preamble
(C) both (i) and (ii)
(D) None of the above
Answer: (B) Preamble
Explanation: The Preamble to the Constitution of India is often referred to as the “Soul of the Constitution” because it encapsulates the fundamental values, philosophy, objectives, and ideals that the Constitution seeks to achieve. This famous characterization was given by N. A. Palkhivala, a renowned jurist and constitutional expert. Similarly, other notable descriptions include “Identity card of the Constitution” (also by Palkhivala) and “Key to the minds of the makers of the Constitution” (by Ernest Barker). The Preamble reflects the basic philosophy and fundamental values on which the entire Constitution is built, guiding its interpretation by courts.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| “Soul of the Constitution” | Preamble |
| Attributed to | N. A. Palkhivala |
| Other famous descriptions of Preamble | “Identity Card of the Constitution” (Palkhivala); “Key to the minds of the makers of the Constitution” (Ernest Barker); “Horoscope of the Constitution” (K. M. Munshi) |
| Legal status of Preamble | Considered part of the Constitution (as held in Kesavananda Bharati case, 1973); part of the Basic Structure Doctrine |
| Is Preamble enforceable in court? | No, it is not directly enforceable, but is used as an interpretative tool |
| Fundamental Rights (for contrast) | Sometimes called the “Conscience of the Constitution” or compared to the American Bill of Rights — but NOT specifically termed the “Soul” |
2. Where are the words ‘Unity and Integrity of the Nation’ are found?
(A) Directive Principles of State Policy.
(B) Emergency Provisions
(C) Fundamental Duties
(D) Preamble
Answer: (D) Preamble
Explanation: The phrase “Unity and Integrity of the Nation” appears in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution, specifically within the “Fraternity” clause. The original 1950 Preamble spoke of promoting fraternity, assuring the dignity of the individual and the “unity of the Nation.” The word “Integrity” was added to this phrase by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, making it “unity and integrity of the Nation” — emphasizing not just the political unity but also the territorial and cultural integrity of India, especially significant given the diverse linguistic, religious, and regional composition of the country.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Phrase location | Preamble (under the “Fraternity” clause) |
| Original 1950 wording | “…assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity of the Nation” |
| Amended wording (post-1976) | “…assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation” |
| Amendment that added “Integrity” | 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 |
| Other words added by same amendment | “Socialist” and “Secular” |
3. When was the First Amendment Bill passed?
(A) 1950
(B) 1952
(C) 1951
(D) 1954
Answer: (C) 1951
Explanation: The Constitution (First Amendment) Act was passed in 1951, just about a year after the Constitution came into effect on 26th January 1950. This amendment made several significant changes, including the addition of the Ninth Schedule (to protect land reform and zamindari abolition laws from judicial review), the insertion of Articles 31A and 31B, and it added reasonable restrictions to the freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(2) (relating to public order, friendly relations with foreign states, and incitement to an offence). It was necessitated primarily due to conflicts between the judiciary and the legislature over land reform laws.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment | Constitution (First Amendment) Act |
| Year passed | 1951 |
| Key additions | Ninth Schedule (protects specified laws from judicial review); Articles 31A and 31B |
| Reason for amendment | Conflicts between judiciary and legislature over land reform/zamindari abolition laws (courts were striking these down citing violation of Fundamental Rights) |
| Changes to Article 19 | Added reasonable restrictions on freedom of speech (public order, incitement to offence, friendly relations with foreign states) |
| Time gap from Constitution’s commencement | About 1 year (Constitution came into force 26 Jan 1950; First Amendment passed 1951) |
4. When was the Constitution of India enacted by the Constituent Assembly ?
(A) 26 January, 1950
(B) 26 November, 1949
(C) 26 January, 1949
(D) 20 January, 1949
Answer: (B) 26 November, 1949
Explanation: The Constitution of India was adopted and enacted by the Constituent Assembly on 26th November, 1949. This date is now commemorated as “Constitution Day” (also known as “Samvidhan Diwas”) in India. However, the Constitution did not come into force immediately upon adoption — most of its provisions came into effect two months later, on 26th January, 1950, a date chosen specifically to coincide with the anniversary of “Purna Swaraj” (complete independence), which had been declared by the Indian National Congress on 26th January, 1930.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Date of adoption/enactment by Constituent Assembly | 26th November, 1949 |
| Commemorated as | Constitution Day / Samvidhan Diwas |
| Date Constitution came into force | 26th January, 1950 (Republic Day) |
| Reason for choosing 26 January for commencement | To honor the “Purna Swaraj” declaration made by INC on 26 January 1930 |
| Provisions that came into force immediately on 26 Nov 1949 | A few provisions (like citizenship, elections, provisional Parliament) took effect immediately; the bulk came into force on 26 Jan 1950 |
5. Where was the first Session of the Constituent Assembly held?
(A) Madras
(B) New Delhi
(C) Calcutta
(D) Bombay
Answer: (B) New Delhi
Explanation: The first session of the Constituent Assembly of India was held in New Delhi on 9th December, 1946, at the Constitution Hall (which is now known as the Central Hall of Parliament House). Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha, the oldest member present, was elected as the temporary/interim Chairman for this first sitting. Notably, members of the Muslim League boycotted this first session, as they were demanding a separate state (Pakistan) and did not wish to participate in a unified Constituent Assembly for undivided India.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Location of first session | New Delhi (Constitution Hall, now Central Hall of Parliament House) |
| Date of first session | 9th December, 1946 |
| Temporary/interim Chairman | Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha (oldest member present) |
| Permanent President (elected 2 days later) | Dr. Rajendra Prasad |
| Boycotted by | Muslim League members (demanding separate Pakistan) |
| Total sittings of Constituent Assembly | 11 sessions over nearly 3 years |
6. Which of the following is not included in the Preamble ?
(A) Sovereign
(B) Socialist
(C) Democratic
(D) Federal
Answer: (D) Federal
Explanation: The word “Federal” does NOT appear in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution. The Preamble describes India as a “SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC,” but makes no explicit mention of India being “federal.” This is significant because, although India functions with a federal structure (division of powers between the Centre and States), the Constitution itself does not use the word “Federal” anywhere, including in Article 1, which instead describes India as a “Union of States.” India’s federal character is inferred from its structure and provisions, rather than being explicitly stated in the Preamble or the opening Article.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Words actually in the Preamble | Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic, Republic |
| Word NOT in the Preamble | “Federal” |
| Where India’s federal nature is instead reflected | Structurally, through the distribution of powers (Union, State, Concurrent Lists) — not explicitly stated in the Preamble or Article 1 |
| Article 1 wording (for context) | “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States” — again, no use of the word “Federal” |
| Scholarly description | K. C. Wheare called India’s Constitution “quasi-federal” — but this too is a scholarly label, not constitutional text |
7. How many Schedules are there in the Constitution of India?
(A) 22
(B) 97
(C) 18
(D) 12
Answer: (D) 12
Explanation: The Constitution of India currently has 12 Schedules. It originally had 8 Schedules when adopted in 1950. Over the decades, four more schedules were added through various amendments: the Ninth Schedule (1st Amendment, 1951 — protects certain laws from judicial review), the Tenth Schedule (52nd Amendment, 1985 — Anti-Defection Law), the Eleventh Schedule (73rd Amendment, 1992 — Panchayats), and the Twelfth Schedule (74th Amendment, 1992 — Municipalities), bringing the total to 12.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Current number of Schedules | 12 |
| Original number (1950) | 8 |
| Ninth Schedule added by | 1st Amendment Act, 1951 |
| Tenth Schedule added by | 52nd Amendment Act, 1985 (Anti-Defection) |
| Eleventh Schedule added by | 73rd Amendment Act, 1992 (Panchayats) |
| Twelfth Schedule added by | 74th Amendment Act, 1992 (Municipalities) |
8. When was the Indian Independence Act passed by the British Parliament?
(A) 18 July, 1947
(B) 20 July, 1947
(C) 18 July, 1946
(D) 20 July, 1946
Answer: (A) 18 July, 1947
Explanation: The Indian Independence Act, 1947 was passed by the British Parliament on 18th July, 1947, and it received royal assent on the same day. This Act formally provided for the creation of two independent dominions — India and Pakistan — effective from 15th August, 1947. It also ended British paramountcy over the Princely States, allowing them to choose whether to join India, Pakistan, or remain independent, and abolished the title “Emperor of India” held by the British monarch.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Act | Indian Independence Act, 1947 |
| Date passed by British Parliament | 18th July, 1947 |
| Effective date (Independence) | 15th August, 1947 |
| Key provisions | Created two independent dominions — India and Pakistan; ended British paramountcy over Princely States; abolished title “Emperor of India” |
| Based on | Mountbatten Plan (3rd June Plan), 1947 |
| Governor-General role after the Act | Continued temporarily, with separate Governors-General for India and Pakistan (Lord Mountbatten became India’s first Governor-General post-independence) |
9. The concept of ‘Liberty’ and ‘Fraternity’ in the Constitution of India was taken from
(A) Germany
(B) Russia
(C) France
(D) USA
Answer: (C) France
Explanation: The ideals of “Liberty” and “Fraternity,” along with “Equality,” enshrined in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution, were inspired by the French Revolution (1789), whose famous rallying cry was “Liberté, égalité, fraternité” (Liberty, Equality, Fraternity). These three ideals form the philosophical backbone of the Preamble’s vision for India, reflecting a commitment to individual freedom, social/legal equality, and a sense of common brotherhood and dignity among all citizens, transcending caste, creed, religion, and region.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Concepts | Liberty, Equality, Fraternity |
| Source | French Revolution (1789) |
| Original French slogan | “Liberté, égalité, fraternité” |
| Where it appears | Preamble to the Indian Constitution |
| Liberty (meaning in Preamble) | Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith, and worship |
| Equality (meaning in Preamble) | Equality of status and opportunity |
| Fraternity (meaning in Preamble) | Assuring dignity of the individual and unity/integrity of the nation |
| Other borrowed Preamble concepts (for comparison) | Idea of a Preamble itself — USA; “Justice” (social, economic, political) — inspired by Russian Revolution ideals, per some scholars |
10. Which Schedule contains “Forms of Oath & Affirmations”?
(A) Eleventh
(B) Third
(C) Fourth
(D) Fifth
Answer: (B) Third
Explanation: The Third Schedule of the Constitution of India lays down the various forms of Oaths or Affirmations to be taken by important constitutional functionaries — including Union Ministers, Members of Parliament, Judges of the Supreme Court, the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India, State Ministers, Members of State Legislatures, and Judges of High Courts — before they assume office.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Schedule | Third Schedule |
| Subject matter | Forms of Oaths or Affirmations |
| Functionaries covered | Union Ministers, MPs, Supreme Court Judges, CAG, State Ministers, MLAs, High Court Judges |
| Notable exclusions | President’s oath (Article 60) and Governor’s oath (Article 159) are given directly in the Constitution’s articles, not the Third Schedule |
| Related schedules (for comparison) | Fourth Schedule – Allocation of Rajya Sabha seats to States/UTs; Fifth Schedule – Administration of Scheduled Areas & Tribes; Eleventh Schedule – Panchayats |
11. Who was the temporary President in the first meeting of the Constituent Assembly on 9 December, 1946?
(A) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(B) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(C) Dr. Sachchidanda Sinha
(D) B. N. Rau
Answer: (C) Dr. Sachchidanda Sinha
Explanation: Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha, being the oldest member present at the first sitting of the Constituent Assembly on 9th December, 1946, was elected as the temporary/interim (provisional) Chairman for that inaugural session, following a convention similar to that of appointing a “Pro-tem Speaker” in legislatures. He presided only over this first sitting. Two days later, on 11th December 1946, Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the permanent President of the Constituent Assembly, a position he held throughout the constitution-making process.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Temporary/interim Chairman (first sitting only) | Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha |
| Reason for his selection | He was the oldest member present (following convention similar to a “Pro-tem Speaker”) |
| Date of first sitting | 9th December, 1946 |
| Permanent President elected | Dr. Rajendra Prasad, on 11th December 1946 |
| Constitutional Advisor (different role) | B. N. Rau |
| Chairman of Drafting Committee (different role) | Dr. B. R. Ambedkar |
12. When were the words “Socialist” and “Secular” added to the Preamble?
(A) 1970
(B) 1950
(C) 1981
(D) 1976
Answer: (D) 1976
Explanation: The words “Socialist” and “Secular” were inserted into the Preamble of the Indian Constitution by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, enacted during the period of National Emergency under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s government. Along with these two words, the term “Integrity” was also added in the Fraternity clause (“unity and integrity of the Nation”). Before this amendment, the Preamble described India only as a “Sovereign Democratic Republic.”
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Year | 1976 |
| Amendment | 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act |
| Words added | “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity” |
| Original (1950) Preamble wording | “Sovereign Democratic Republic” |
| Amended Preamble wording (post-1976) | “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic” |
| Enacted during | National Emergency (1975–1977), PM Indira Gandhi |
| Number of times Preamble has been amended | Only once, in 1976 |
13. What is Article 5 of the Constitution of India related to?
(A) Fundamental Duties
(B) Voting
(C) Citizenship
(D) Formation of new states
Answer: (C) Citizenship
Explanation: Article 5 of the Indian Constitution falls under Part II (Citizenship) and deals with citizenship by domicile at the commencement of the Constitution. It specifies that a person who has their domicile in the territory of India, and who was either born in India, or has either of their parents born in India, or has been ordinarily resident in India for not less than five years immediately preceding the commencement of the Constitution, shall be a citizen of India as of 26th January 1950.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Article | Article 5 |
| Part of Constitution | Part II (Citizenship) |
| Subject matter | Citizenship by domicile at the commencement of the Constitution |
| Conditions specified | Domicile in India + (born in India, OR either parent born in India, OR ordinarily resident for at least 5 years before commencement) |
| Related Articles in Part II | Article 6 – migrants from Pakistan; Article 7 – migrants to Pakistan; Article 8 – Persons of Indian origin residing outside India; Article 9 – Persons voluntarily acquiring foreign citizenship excluded; Article 11 – Parliament empowered to regulate citizenship by law |
| Resulting legislation | Citizenship Act, 1955 (enacted using power under Article 11) |
14. When was the Indian Citizenship Act enacted?
(A) 1960
(B) 1949
(C) 1950
(D) 1955
Answer: (D) 1955
Explanation: The Citizenship Act was enacted by the Parliament of India in 1955, exercising the power granted under Article 11 of the Constitution, which empowers Parliament to regulate the right of citizenship by law. While Part II of the Constitution (Articles 5–11) dealt with citizenship only at the commencement of the Constitution (26th January 1950), the Citizenship Act, 1955, provides for the acquisition and termination of citizenship after that date — covering methods such as birth, descent, registration, naturalization, and incorporation of territory. The Act has since been amended multiple times, notably in 1986, 2003, and 2019 (Citizenship Amendment Act).
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Act | Citizenship Act |
| Year enacted | 1955 |
| Enabling constitutional provision | Article 11 (Part II) |
| Purpose | Regulates acquisition and termination of Indian citizenship after 26 January 1950 |
| Modes of acquiring citizenship under the Act | Birth, Descent, Registration, Naturalization, Incorporation of Territory |
| Notable subsequent amendments | 1986, 2003, and 2019 (Citizenship Amendment Act, CAA) |
| Constitutional Part covering citizenship at commencement | Part II (Articles 5–11) — distinct from the 1955 Act, which covers post-1950 citizenship matters |
15. The idea of ‘Single Citizenship’ was taken from which country?
(A) Russia
(B) France
(C) Ireland
(D) United Kingdom
Answer: (D) United Kingdom
Explanation: This is the same concept tested earlier as Question 30 in the WBCS 2023 paper. India follows the concept of “Single Citizenship,” meaning every Indian, regardless of the state they belong to, is a citizen of India as a whole, with no separate state citizenship (unlike the USA’s dual citizenship model). This concept was borrowed from the British Constitution, and is intended to promote national unity and prevent regional discrimination, despite India’s federal structure with multiple states.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Concept | Single Citizenship |
| Source country | United Kingdom |
| Meaning | Every Indian is a citizen of India only, not separately of any state |
| Contrast (Dual Citizenship) | USA — citizens hold both national and separate state citizenship |
| Purpose in Indian context | Promotes national unity and integrity; prevents regional bias |
| Governing provisions | Part II (Articles 5–11) for citizenship at commencement; Citizenship Act, 1955 for subsequent regulation |
16. When was the first meeting of the Constituent Assembly held?
(A) 9th December, 1945
(B) 9th December, 1946
(C) 9th December, 1947
(D) 9th December, 1948
Answer: (B) 9th December, 1946
Explanation: The first meeting (first session) of the Constituent Assembly of India was held on 9th December, 1946, at the Constitution Hall in New Delhi (now known as the Central Hall of Parliament House). Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha, being the oldest member present, was elected as the temporary/interim Chairman for this inaugural sitting. The Muslim League boycotted this session, as they were demanding a separate Constituent Assembly for Pakistan. Two days later, on 11th December 1946, Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the permanent President of the Assembly.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Date of first meeting | 9th December, 1946 |
| Venue | Constitution Hall, New Delhi (now Central Hall of Parliament House) |
| Temporary Chairman | Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha (oldest member present) |
| Permanent President (elected 2 days later) | Dr. Rajendra Prasad, on 11th December 1946 |
| Boycotted by | Muslim League (demanding separate Pakistan) |
| Basis of Assembly’s formation | Cabinet Mission Plan, 1946 |
17. Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution deals with
(A) Panchayats
(B) Tribunals
(C) Rajya Sabha
(D) List of Recognized Languages
Answer: (D) List of Recognized Languages
Explanation: The Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution contains the list of officially recognized (scheduled) languages of India. Originally, in 1950, it had 14 languages; over time, through various amendments (21st Amendment in 1967, 71st Amendment in 1992, and 92nd Amendment in 2003), more languages were added, bringing the current total to 22. This schedule serves as the basis for the development, promotion, and official use of these languages in various government functions, including translations and competitive examinations.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Schedule | Eighth Schedule |
| Subject matter | List of recognized/scheduled languages of India |
| Original number of languages (1950) | 14 |
| Current number of languages | 22 |
| Key amendments adding languages | 21st (1967) – Sindhi; 71st (1992) – Konkani, Manipuri, Nepali; 92nd (2003) – Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, Santhali |
| Related schedules (for comparison) | Eleventh Schedule – Panchayats (73rd Amendment); Twelfth Schedule – Municipalities (74th Amendment); Fourth Schedule – Allocation of Rajya Sabha seats |
18. The States were reorganized in the year 1956 mainly on the basis of
(A) Linguistic and Cultural uniformity.
(B) Administration facility.
(C) Geographic similarity.
(D) Administrative uniformity.
Answer: (A) Linguistic and Cultural uniformity
Explanation: This is the same concept tested earlier as Question 22 in the WBCS 2023 paper. The States Reorganisation Act, 1956, based on the recommendations of the States Reorganisation Commission (SRC) headed by Fazl Ali (with members H.N. Kunzru and K.M. Panikkar), redrew state boundaries mainly on the basis of linguistic and cultural uniformity. This was largely in response to widespread linguistic movements across India, most prominently the agitation for a separate Telugu-speaking Andhra State, which had already led to the formation of Andhra Pradesh in 1953 following Potti Sriramulu’s fast-unto-death.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Act | States Reorganisation Act, 1956 |
| Basis of reorganization | Linguistic and cultural uniformity |
| Commission | States Reorganisation Commission (SRC), 1953 |
| Chairman | Fazl Ali |
| Other members | H. N. Kunzru, K. M. Panikkar |
| Trigger event | Formation of Andhra State (1953) following Potti Sriramulu’s fast-unto-death |
| Result | India reorganized into 14 states and 6 Union Territories |
| Earlier opposing commissions | Dhar Commission (1948) and JVP Committee (1948–49) initially opposed linguistic states, but public pressure changed the approach |
19. Which is not a condition for becoming a citizen of India ?
(A) Naturalization
(B) Birth
(C) Descent
(D) Acquiring Property
Answer: (D) Acquiring Property
Explanation: Under the Citizenship Act, 1955, Indian citizenship can be acquired through five recognized methods: Birth, Descent, Registration, Naturalization, and Incorporation of Territory. Merely “Acquiring Property” in India is NOT a recognized mode of gaining Indian citizenship — owning land or property in India does not automatically grant a person citizenship rights. This is an important distinction, especially since some countries do grant residency or citizenship-related benefits based on property investment (a concept sometimes called “Golden Visa” schemes elsewhere), but India’s Citizenship Act does not recognize this method.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Recognized modes of acquiring Indian citizenship | Birth, Descent, Registration, Naturalization, Incorporation of Territory |
| NOT a recognized mode | Acquiring Property |
| Governing Act | Citizenship Act, 1955 |
| Enabling constitutional Article | Article 11 (empowers Parliament to regulate citizenship) |
| Naturalization (meaning) | Citizenship granted to a foreigner after fulfilling specified conditions (e.g., residency period, good character) |
| Incorporation of Territory (meaning) | When new territory becomes part of India, its residents may acquire Indian citizenship (e.g., Goa, Sikkim, Puducherry after their integration) |
20. From where has been the concept of Fundamental Rights taken?
(A) USSR
(B) USA
(C) France
(D) Britain
Answer: (B) USA
Explanation: The concept of Fundamental Rights (Part III of the Indian Constitution) was borrowed from the Constitution of the United States of America, specifically from the American Bill of Rights. These are justiciable rights, meaning citizens can directly approach the courts (Supreme Court under Article 32, or High Courts under Article 226) for their enforcement if violated. This differs from the British model, which relies on parliamentary sovereignty and unwritten conventions rather than an explicitly codified, enforceable bill of rights.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Concept | Fundamental Rights |
| Source country | USA (American Bill of Rights) |
| Location in Constitution | Part III (Articles 12–35) |
| Enforcement mechanism | Article 32 (Supreme Court) and Article 226 (High Courts) — “Right to Constitutional Remedies,” called the “Heart and Soul” of the Constitution by Ambedkar |
| Nature of Fundamental Rights | Justiciable (enforceable by courts), unlike Directive Principles which are non-justiciable |
| Contrast with Britain | UK lacks a codified, enforceable bill of rights; relies on parliamentary sovereignty and conventions |
| Other USA-inspired features (for comparison) | Judicial Review, Independence of Judiciary, Post of Vice-President, Impeachment procedure of President |
21. Who was the Chairman of the Drafting Committee ?
(A) Tej Bahadur Sapru
(B) Rajendra Prasad
(C) C. Rajagopalachari
(D) B. R. Ambedkar
Answer: (D) B. R. Ambedkar
Explanation: This is the same concept tested earlier as Question 15 in the WBCS 2022 paper. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar was appointed as the Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Constituent Assembly, which was constituted on 29th August 1947. This seven-member committee was responsible for scrutinizing the draft prepared by the Constitutional Advisor, B. N. Rau, and preparing the final draft Constitution for the Constituent Assembly’s consideration. Due to his monumental contribution in shaping and finalizing the Constitution, Dr. Ambedkar is popularly known as the “Father of the Indian Constitution.”
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Chairman of Drafting Committee | Dr. B. R. Ambedkar |
| Date Drafting Committee constituted | 29th August 1947 |
| Total members of Drafting Committee | 7 |
| Other members | N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar, Alladi Krishnaswamy Ayyar, Dr. K. M. Munshi, Syed Mohammad Saadullah, N. Madhava Rau, T. T. Krishnamachari |
| Popular title for Ambedkar | “Father of the Indian Constitution” |
| Permanent President of Constituent Assembly (different role) | Dr. Rajendra Prasad |
| Constitutional Advisor (different role) | B. N. Rau |
WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper – 2020
1. The Preamble of the Indian Constitution was inspired by the Preamble of the Constitution of which country ?
(A) U.S. Constitution
(B) Swiss Constitution
(C) British Constitution
(D) Constitution of Canada
Answer: (A) U.S. Constitution
Explanation: The idea of having a Preamble — a brief introductory statement outlining the guiding philosophy, purpose, and source of authority of the Constitution — was borrowed from the Constitution of the United States of America. The Indian Preamble’s opening phrase, “WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA…”, closely mirrors the US Preamble’s “We the People of the United States…”, reflecting that ultimate sovereignty rests with the people of India.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Source of inspiration | United States (US) Constitution |
| Opening phrase of Indian Preamble | “WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA…” |
| Opening phrase of US Preamble | “We the People of the United States…” |
| Significance | Establishes that sovereignty and authority of the Constitution flow from the people of India |
| Constitutional status of Preamble | Part of the Basic Structure Doctrine (Kesavananda Bharati case, 1973) |
| Amendability | Amended only once so far (42nd Amendment, 1976) |
2. The Constitution (Ninety-second Amendment) Act, 2003, amended the Eighth schedule to the Constitution so as to include Bodo, Dogri, Maithili and Santhali languages, thereby raising the total number of languages listed in the schedule to
(A) 20
(B) 21
(C) 22
(D) 23
Answer: (C) 22
Explanation: The Constitution (Ninety-second Amendment) Act, 2003, added four languages — Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, and Santhali — to the Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution. Before this amendment, the Eighth Schedule contained 18 languages (14 original + Sindhi added by the 21st Amendment in 1967 + Konkani, Manipuri, and Nepali added by the 71st Amendment in 1992). With the addition of these four languages in 2003, the total number of scheduled languages became 22, which remains the current total to this day.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment | 92nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2003 |
| Languages added | Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, Santhali |
| Number of languages before this amendment | 18 |
| Number of languages after this amendment | 22 (current total) |
| Full timeline of Eighth Schedule expansion | 1950 – 14 languages (original); 1967 (21st Amendment) – added Sindhi (15 total); 1992 (71st Amendment) – added Konkani, Manipuri, Nepali (18 total); 2003 (92nd Amendment) – added Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, Santhali (22 total, current) |
3. The Preamble to the Indian Constitution has been amended and the terms ‘Socialist’, ‘Secular’ and ‘Integrity’ have been added by which Amendment Act ? Choose the correct option.
(A) 42nd Amendment Act
(B) 43rd Amendment Act
(C) 45th Amendment Act
(D) 46th Amendment Act
Answer: (A) 42nd Amendment Act
Explanation: This is the same recurring concept tested multiple times across WBCS papers (2023 Q9, 2022 Q10 & Q17, 2021 Q2 & Q12). The Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, added the words “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity” to the Preamble of the Indian Constitution. This amendment was enacted during the National Emergency period (1975–1977) under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s government and remains the only amendment ever made to the Preamble’s text.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment | 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 |
| Words added to Preamble | “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity” |
| Original (1950) Preamble wording | “Sovereign Democratic Republic…unity of the Nation” |
| Amended Preamble wording | “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic…unity and integrity of the Nation” |
| Enacted during | National Emergency (1975–1977), PM Indira Gandhi |
| Number of times Preamble amended | Only once (1976) |
4. Who is known as the Father of the Indian Constitution ?
(A) Jawaharlal Nehru
(B) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(C) Alladi Krishna Swami Ayyar
(D) Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan
Answer: (B) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
Explanation: Dr. B. R. Ambedkar is popularly known as the “Father of the Indian Constitution” due to his pivotal and monumental role as the Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Constituent Assembly. He was primarily responsible for meticulously scrutinizing, refining, and finalizing the draft Constitution before it was presented to and adopted by the Constituent Assembly. His deep legal expertise, along with his strong advocacy for social justice, equality, and the rights of marginalized communities, significantly shaped the final structure and content of the Constitution.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Title | “Father of the Indian Constitution” |
| Person | Dr. B. R. Ambedkar |
| Role held | Chairman of the Drafting Committee (constituted 29 August 1947) |
| Other significant roles of Ambedkar | India’s first Law Minister; strong advocate for social justice and rights of Dalits/marginalized communities |
| Permanent President of Constituent Assembly (different role) | Dr. Rajendra Prasad |
| Objective Resolution mover (different role) | Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru |
| Constitutional Advisor (different role) | B. N. Rau |
| Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (for context) | Philosopher-statesman; became India’s first Vice-President and later second President — not directly linked to Constitution drafting |
5. In which year did Goa became the 25th State of India ?
(A) 1987
(B) 1988
(C) 1989
(D) 1990
Answer: (A) 1987
Explanation: Goa, along with Daman and Diu, was liberated from Portuguese colonial rule in 1961 and initially administered as a Union Territory. On 30th May 1987, through the Goa, Daman and Diu Reorganisation Act, 1987, Goa was granted full statehood, becoming the 25th State of the Indian Union, while Daman and Diu continued as a separate Union Territory.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Event | Goa attained full statehood |
| Year | 1987 (specifically 30th May 1987) |
| Governing Act | Goa, Daman and Diu Reorganisation Act, 1987 |
| Sequence in Indian Union | 25th State of India |
| Prior status | Union Territory (from 1961, after liberation from Portuguese rule) |
| Bifurcation | Daman and Diu remained a separate Union Territory |
| Related fact | Mizoram (23rd state) and Arunachal Pradesh (24th state) both attained statehood on 20 February 1987, shortly before Goa’s statehood on 30 May 1987 |
6. Which part of the Constitution of India describes citizenship at the commencement of the Constitution ?
(A) Part I
(B) Part II
(C) Part III
(D) Part IV
Answer: (B) Part II
Explanation: Part II of the Constitution of India, comprising Articles 5 to 11, deals with citizenship at the commencement of the Constitution (26th January 1950). It covers various categories of persons who became citizens of India at that time, including those domiciled in India, migrants from and to Pakistan, persons of Indian origin residing abroad, and those who voluntarily acquired foreign citizenship (thereby losing Indian citizenship). Article 11 further empowers Parliament to make laws regulating citizenship thereafter, which led to the enactment of the Citizenship Act, 1955.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Part of Constitution | Part II |
| Articles covered | Article 5 to Article 11 |
| Subject matter | Citizenship at the commencement of the Constitution (26 January 1950) |
| Article 5 | Citizenship by domicile at commencement |
| Article 6 | Rights of citizenship of certain persons who migrated from Pakistan |
| Article 7 | Rights of citizenship of certain migrants to Pakistan |
| Article 8 | Rights of citizenship of certain persons of Indian origin residing outside India |
| Article 9 | Persons voluntarily acquiring foreign citizenship not to be citizens |
| Article 11 | Empowers Parliament to regulate citizenship by law (led to Citizenship Act, 1955) |
7. Choose the correct answer :
(A) The Constituent Assembly of India took about one year to complete its work.
(B) The Constituent Assembly of India took about two years to complete its work.
(C) The Constituent Assembly of India took about three years to complete its work .
(D) The Constituent Assembly of India took about four years to complete its work.
Answer: (C) The Constituent Assembly of India took about three years to complete its work.
Explanation: The Constituent Assembly of India held its first session on 9th December 1946 and completed its work with the adoption of the Constitution on 26th November 1949. This spans a period of approximately 2 years, 11 months, and 18 days — commonly rounded off and referred to as “about three years” in most exam contexts. During this time, the Assembly held 11 sessions spread over 165 days, carefully deliberating on and drafting each provision of the Constitution.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| First session | 9th December 1946 |
| Constitution adopted | 26th November 1949 |
| Exact duration | 2 years, 11 months, 18 days |
| Commonly rounded to | “About 3 years” |
| Total sessions held | 11 |
| Total days of sitting | 165 days |
| Constitution came into force | 26th January 1950 (about 2 months after adoption) |
8. Who is known as the Father of the Lok Sabha ?
(A) G.V. Mavalankar
(B) Rabi Ray
(C) Balram Jakhar
(D) P. A. Sangma
Answer: (A) G.V. Mavalankar
Explanation: Ganesh Vasudev Mavalankar (G.V. Mavalankar) is popularly known as the “Father of the Lok Sabha” because he served as the first Speaker of the Lok Sabha (the Lower House of the Indian Parliament) after independence. He had earlier also served as the Speaker of the Central Legislative Assembly (the pre-independence legislature) and later as the Speaker of the Provisional Parliament before India’s first general elections. His long tenure and foundational role in establishing parliamentary conventions and procedures for the Lok Sabha earned him this honorary title.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Title | “Father of the Lok Sabha” |
| Person | G. V. Mavalankar |
| Role | First Speaker of the Lok Sabha (independent India) |
| Earlier role | Speaker of the Central Legislative Assembly (pre-independence) and Provisional Parliament |
| Tenure as Lok Sabha Speaker | 1952–1956 |
| Significance | Established many parliamentary conventions and procedures still followed today |
| Other Speakers mentioned (for contrast) | Balram Jakhar – longest-serving Lok Sabha Speaker (two terms, 1980–89); Rabi Ray – Speaker during 1989–91; P. A. Sangma – Speaker during 1996–98 |
9. Which Amendment Act made Sikkim a full-fledged state of India ?
(A) 34th Constitutional Amendment Act
(B) 35th Constitutional Amendment Act
(C) 36th Constitutional Amendment Act
(D) 37th Constitutional Amendment Act
Answer: (C) 36th Constitutional Amendment Act
Explanation: Sikkim’s integration with India happened in two stages: first, the 35th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1974, granted Sikkim the status of an “Associate State” of India (inserting Article 2A and a since-repealed Tenth Schedule dealing with Sikkim’s terms of association). Following a referendum in April 1975, where the people of Sikkim voted to merge with India and abolish the monarchy, the 36th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1975, granted Sikkim full statehood, making it the 22nd State of the Indian Union.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment granting full statehood | 36th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1975 |
| Prior step: Associate State status | Granted by 35th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1974 |
| Referendum | Held in April 1975; people voted to merge with India, abolishing monarchy |
| Article dealing with Sikkim’s special provisions | Article 371F |
| Sequence in Indian Union | 22nd State of India |
| Political context | End of Chogyal (monarchical) rule in Sikkim |
10. Fill in the blank : In India the concept of single citizenship is adopted from _____.
(A) The French Constitution
(B) The Swiss Constitution
(C) The Constitution of United States of America
(D) The British Constitution
Answer: (D) The British Constitution
Explanation: India follows the concept of “Single Citizenship,” meaning every Indian citizen, regardless of the state they reside in or belong to, is a citizen of India as a whole — there is no separate state-level citizenship (unlike the USA’s dual citizenship system). This concept was borrowed from the British Constitution to promote national unity and prevent regional discrimination among citizens, despite India’s federal structure comprising multiple states.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Concept | Single Citizenship |
| Source country | United Kingdom |
| Meaning | Every Indian is a citizen of India only, with no separate state citizenship |
| Contrast (Dual Citizenship) | USA — citizens hold both national and state-level citizenship |
| Purpose in Indian context | Promotes national unity and integrity; avoids regional discrimination |
| Governing provisions | Part II (Articles 5–11); Citizenship Act, 1955 |
| Other features borrowed from UK (for comparison) | Parliamentary system, Rule of Law, Cabinet system, Bicameralism, Prerogative writs |
11. When was the Indian Constitution first adopted ?
(A) The Constituent Assembly adopted the Constitution of India on 26th January, 1950.
(B) The Constituent Assembly adopted the Constitution of India on 26th January, 1949.
(C) The Constitution of India was adopted by the Constituent Assembly on 26th November, 1949 .
(D) The Constitution of India was adopted on 26th November, 1948.
Answer: (C) The Constitution of India was adopted by the Constituent Assembly on 26th November, 1949.
Explanation: The Constitution of India was formally adopted by the Constituent Assembly on 26th November, 1949 — a date now commemorated as “Constitution Day” or “Samvidhan Diwas.” However, the Constitution did not come into force immediately; most of its provisions took effect two months later, on 26th January, 1950, chosen specifically to mark the anniversary of the “Purna Swaraj” declaration made by the Indian National Congress on 26th January, 1930.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Date of adoption | 26th November, 1949 |
| Commemorated as | Constitution Day / Samvidhan Diwas |
| Date of commencement (coming into force) | 26th January, 1950 (Republic Day) |
| Reason for choosing 26 January | To honor the “Purna Swaraj” declaration by INC on 26 January 1930 |
| Provisions effective immediately upon adoption | A few (citizenship, elections, provisional Parliament); most others took effect only from 26 Jan 1950 |
12. Which is the longest written constitution in the world ?
(A) The Constitution of the United States
(B) The Constitution of India
(C) The Constitution of the Fifth Republic of France
(D) The Constitution of Switzerland
Answer: (B) The Constitution of India
Explanation: The Constitution of India is widely recognized as the longest written constitution of any sovereign country in the world. It originally contained 395 Articles, 22 Parts, and 8 Schedules when adopted in 1950, and has since grown further through numerous amendments to approximately 448 Articles and 12 Schedules. This extensive length is due to the framers’ attempt to incorporate detailed provisions covering a vast range of subjects — including administrative details, federal structure, fundamental rights, and directive principles — to avoid ambiguity in a large, diverse, and complex nation like India.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Longest written constitution in the world | Constitution of India |
| Original length (1950) | 395 Articles, 22 Parts, 8 Schedules |
| Current length (approx., after amendments) | ~448 Articles, 25 Parts, 12 Schedules |
| Reason for its length | Framers aimed to cover extensive administrative detail, given India’s size, diversity, and complexity; borrowed provisions from multiple other constitutions and adapted them |
| Contrast — shortest written constitution | Constitution of the United States (originally just 7 Articles, with amendments added later) |
| Other constitutions mentioned (for context) | France’s Fifth Republic Constitution (1958) and Switzerland’s Constitution are comparatively much shorter and more concise |
13. Choose the correct statement stated in the Constitution of India :
(A) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Federation of States.
(B) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States .
(C) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Quasi federal State.
(D) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Unitary State.
Answer: (B) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.
Explanation: Article 1 of the Constitution of India explicitly states, “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.” The framers, particularly Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, deliberately chose the term “Union” over “Federation” to convey two key ideas: first, that the Indian federation was not formed by an agreement among previously independent states (unlike the USA), and second, that no state has the right to secede from the Union, making it indestructible despite functioning with a federal structure of governance.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Constitutional Article | Article 1 |
| Exact phrase | “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States” |
| Reason for “Union” over “Federation” | Federation not formed by agreement between states; no state has right to secede |
| Explained by | Dr. B. R. Ambedkar in Constituent Assembly debates |
| Scholarly description of India’s federalism | “Quasi-federal” (coined by K. C. Wheare) — an academic label, not the actual constitutional wording |
WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper – 2019
1. For the first time, which Constitutional Amendment made it clear that ‘State’ in clauses (a) to (e) of Article 3 of the Constitution includes ‘Union Territories’?
(A) 17th
(B) 18th
(C) 19th
(D) 20th
Answer: (B) 18th
Explanation: The Constitution (Eighteenth Amendment) Act, 1966, clarified and expanded the scope of Article 3, which deals with the formation of new states and alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing states. This amendment explicitly added an explanation to Article 3, making it clear that the term “State” used in clauses (a) to (e) of the Article also includes “Union Territories.” This meant that Parliament could similarly form new Union Territories, alter their boundaries, or change their names using the same procedure applicable to states, without requiring a more cumbersome constitutional amendment process for each such change.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment | 18th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1966 |
| Article affected | Article 3 (Formation of new states; alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing states) |
| Key clarification added | “State” in clauses (a) to (e) of Article 3 also includes “Union Territories” |
| Practical effect | Parliament can form/alter Union Territories using the same simplified procedure as for States (by simple majority, not the more stringent Article 368 special majority) |
| Article 3 clauses covered | (a) formation of new states, (b) increase/decrease of state area, (c) alteration of boundaries, (d) alteration of names, (e) related definitional matters |
| Procedure to amend Article 3 laws | Requires only a simple majority in Parliament (President’s prior recommendation + reference to concerned State Legislature for its views, though not binding) |
2. Which of the following Articles describe about the person voluntarily acquiring citizenship of a foreign state not to be citizens?
(A) Article 5
(B) Article 6
(C) Article 7
(D) Article 9
Answer: (D) Article 9
Explanation: Article 9 of the Indian Constitution, falling under Part II (Citizenship), states that if a person has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign state, they shall NOT be considered a citizen of India. This provision reinforces India’s concept of Single Citizenship, meaning a person cannot simultaneously hold Indian citizenship and the citizenship of another country by their own choice (India generally does not recognize dual citizenship, though it does offer the separate status of “Overseas Citizen of India” (OCI), which is not equivalent to full citizenship).
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Article | Article 9 |
| Part of Constitution | Part II (Citizenship) |
| Subject matter | Persons who voluntarily acquire citizenship of a foreign state shall not be citizens of India |
| Related Articles in Part II | Article 5 – citizenship by domicile; Article 6 – migrants from Pakistan; Article 7 – migrants to Pakistan; Article 8 – Persons of Indian origin residing outside India; Article 11 – Parliament’s power to regulate citizenship |
| Related concept | India’s policy of Single Citizenship (no dual citizenship) |
3. The Constitution of India has borrowed its federal scheme of ‘Union of States’ from which country?
(A) United States of America
(B) Canada
(C) Ireland
(D) Russia
Answer: (B) Canada
Explanation: The concept and terminology of “Union of States,” along with a strong Centre relative to the States (where residuary powers rest with the Union rather than the States), was borrowed from the Canadian Constitution. Canada’s federal model was seen as more suitable for India’s needs at the time of independence, given concerns about national unity and integration of diverse regions and princely states. Unlike the American federal model (where states are more autonomous and came together voluntarily), Canada’s model emphasizes a strong central government, which aligned with India’s requirement for greater national cohesion.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Feature | “Union of States” federal scheme with strong Centre |
| Source country | Canada |
| Key similarity to Canadian model | Residuary powers vested with the Union/Centre (not the States), unlike the USA where residuary powers rest with States |
| Constitutional reflection | Article 1 – “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States” |
| Contrast with USA’s federal model | In the USA, federation was formed by voluntary agreement between independent states; states retain more autonomy and residuary powers |
4. When the name of a State is changed or a new State is created , the Constitution is required to be amended by the Parliament by a
(A) simple majority as required under Articles 107and 108
(B) majority of total members of both the Houses under Article 368.
(C) special majority under Article 368.
(D) special majority after obtaining the opinion of the concerned State Legislature under Article 3.
Answer: (A) simple majority as required under Articles 107 and 108
Explanation: Under Article 3 of the Constitution, Parliament can form new states, alter the areas, boundaries, or names of existing states through a simple legislative process — treated like an ordinary law, requiring only a simple majority of members present and voting, as per the general legislative procedure outlined in Articles 107 and 108 (which deal with the ordinary process of passing bills in Parliament). While the President must first recommend such a bill and refer it to the concerned State Legislature for its views, the State Legislature’s opinion is NOT binding on Parliament, and no special majority (as required for constitutional amendments under Article 368) is needed for such changes.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Governing Article for creation/renaming of States | Article 3 |
| Type of majority required | Simple majority (as per ordinary legislative procedure under Articles 107 & 108) |
| Role of President | Must recommend the bill before introduction in Parliament |
| Role of concerned State Legislature | Must be consulted for its views, but the opinion is NOT binding on Parliament |
| Contrast with Article 368 (constitutional amendments) | Requires special majority (2/3rd of members present & voting + majority of total membership), and for certain provisions, ratification by half the states |
| Why Article 3 changes are treated as ordinary law | This reflects India’s “Union of States” character — the Centre has significant power over state boundaries, unlike a more rigid federal system |
5. National Capital Territory of Delhi was constituted by
(A) Ordinance promulgated by the Lieutenant Governor.
(B) Ordinance promulgated by the President.
(C) 71st Amendment.
(D) 69th Amendment.
Answer: (D) 69th Amendment
Explanation: The Constitution (Sixty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1991, inserted Articles 239AA and 239AB into the Constitution, granting Delhi the special status of “National Capital Territory of Delhi” (NCT of Delhi), along with its own Legislative Assembly and a Council of Ministers headed by a Chief Minister. However, certain critical subjects — Police, Public Order, and Land — remain under the control of the Union Government, administered through the Lieutenant Governor.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment | 69th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1991 |
| Articles inserted | Article 239AA and 239AB |
| New nomenclature | National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCT of Delhi) |
| Key provisions | Legislative Assembly for Delhi; Council of Ministers headed by Chief Minister |
| Subjects excluded from Delhi Assembly’s control | Public Order, Police, and Land (remain with Union Government) |
| Administrative head | Lieutenant Governor (represents the Union Government) |
| Related Act | Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act, 1991 |
6. By virtue of its special status , the State of Jammu & Kashmir has a separate
(A) Constitution
(B) defence force
(C) judiciary
(D) All of the above
Answer: (A) Constitution
Explanation: Historically, prior to August 2019, Jammu and Kashmir enjoyed special status under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, which allowed it to have its own separate state Constitution (the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, which came into force on 26th January 1957). This was a unique privilege not enjoyed by any other Indian state, all of which are governed only by the single Constitution of India. However, J&K did NOT have a separate defence force or a fully separate judiciary system independent of India’s judicial hierarchy — the Supreme Court of India’s jurisdiction extended to J&K as well, and national defence remained solely under the Union Government’s control. Note: This question reflects the constitutional position as it existed before the abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019, after which J&K’s separate constitution ceased to exist and it was reorganized into two Union Territories.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Special provision (historical) | Article 370 |
| J&K’s separate Constitution | Came into force on 26th January 1957; ceased after August 2019 |
| Did J&K have separate defence force? | No — national defence remained under the Union Government |
| Did J&K have a fully separate judiciary? | No — Supreme Court of India’s jurisdiction extended to J&K |
| Major change in 2019 | Article 370 abrogated (5 August 2019); J&K’s separate Constitution ceased to exist; state reorganized into two Union Territories — Jammu & Kashmir, and Ladakh (effective 31 October 2019) |
7. The Indian Independence Act, 1947 ,came into force on
(A) 3rd June, 1947
(B) 18th July, 1947
(C) 26th July, 1947
(D) 14th August, 1947
Answer: (D) 14th August, 1947
Explanation: While the Indian Independence Act, 1947, was passed by the British Parliament and received royal assent on 18th July, 1947, the Act itself came into force/effect on 14th/15th August, 1947, formally creating the two independent dominions of India and Pakistan. Pakistan’s independence was marked at midnight on 14th August 1947, while India’s independence was celebrated on 15th August, 1947. The date 3rd June, 1947, refers to Lord Mountbatten’s Plan (the “3rd June Plan” or Mountbatten Plan), which first proposed the partition scheme that was later formalized through the Indian Independence Act.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Act passed by British Parliament | 18th July, 1947 |
| Act came into force / effective date | 14th/15th August, 1947 |
| Pakistan’s independence | Midnight, 14th August 1947 |
| India’s independence | 15th August, 1947 |
| Mountbatten Plan (precursor to the Act) | 3rd June, 1947 — first announced the partition proposal |
| Key provisions of the Act | Created two independent dominions (India & Pakistan); ended British paramountcy over Princely States; abolished title “Emperor of India” |
8. The first session of the Constituent Assembly was held on
(A) 15th August, 1947
(B) 26th January, 1946
(C) 9th December, 1946
(D) 26th November, 1949
Answer: (C) 9th December, 1946
Explanation: The first session of the Constituent Assembly of India was held on 9th December, 1946, at the Constitution Hall in New Delhi (now the Central Hall of Parliament House). Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha, the oldest member present, served as the temporary/interim Chairman for this inaugural sitting, before Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the permanent President two days later, on 11th December 1946.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Date of first session | 9th December, 1946 |
| Venue | Constitution Hall, New Delhi (now Central Hall of Parliament House) |
| Temporary Chairman | Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha |
| Permanent President (elected 2 days later) | Dr. Rajendra Prasad, on 11th December 1946 |
| Boycotted by | Muslim League members (demanding separate Pakistan) |
| Basis of Assembly’s formation | Cabinet Mission Plan, 1946 |
9. The Constitution of India was adopted by the Constituent Assembly on
(A) 15th August, 1947
(B) 25th August, 1949
(C) 26th November, 1949
(D) 26th January, 1950
Answer: (C) 26th November, 1949
Explanation: The Constituent Assembly of India formally adopted the Constitution on 26th November, 1949 — a date now commemorated annually as “Constitution Day” or “Samvidhan Diwas.” The Constitution, however, came into force two months later, on 26th January, 1950, chosen specifically to mark the anniversary of the “Purna Swaraj” declaration made by the Indian National Congress on 26th January, 1930.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Date of adoption | 26th November, 1949 |
| Commemorated as | Constitution Day / Samvidhan Diwas |
| Date of commencement (coming into force) | 26th January, 1950 (Republic Day) |
| Reason for choosing 26 January | To honor the “Purna Swaraj” declaration by INC on 26 January 1930 |
| 15th August, 1947 (for context) | Date of India’s Independence — unrelated to Constitution adoption |
WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper – 2018
1. Which of the following sought to change the character of Indian Government from unitary to federal ?
(A) Indian Council Act, 1909
(B) Government of India Act, 1935
(C) Government of India Act, 1919
(D) Indian Independence Act, 1947
Answer: (B) Government of India Act, 1935
Explanation: The Government of India Act, 1935, was a landmark colonial-era legislation that sought to transform the character of Indian governance from a unitary system to a federal one. It proposed an All-India Federation comprising both British Indian provinces and the Princely States, with a clear division of subjects into three lists — Federal List, Provincial List, and Concurrent List — laying the groundwork for the federal structure later adopted in India’s Constitution. Although the proposed all-India federation never actually came into force (as the Princely States refused to join), the Act did introduce Provincial Autonomy, granting significant self-governing powers to the provinces, marking a genuine shift toward federalism.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Act | Government of India Act, 1935 |
| Key feature | Attempted to shift India’s governance structure from unitary to federal |
| Structural changes proposed | All-India Federation (British provinces + Princely States); division of powers into Federal, Provincial, and Concurrent Lists |
| Why the federation failed to materialize | Princely States refused to join |
| Feature that DID take effect | Provincial Autonomy — provinces given significant self-governing powers |
| Other colonial Acts (for comparison) | Indian Councils Act, 1909 (Morley-Minto Reforms) – introduced separate electorates, no federal shift; Government of India Act, 1919 (Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms) – introduced Dyarchy in provinces, still largely unitary; Indian Independence Act, 1947 – granted independence and partition, not primarily about federal structure |
2. The Indian Constitution has borrowed the ideas of Preamble from the
(A) Canadian Constitution
(B) Italian Constitution
(C) French Constitution
(D) Constitution of USA
Answer: (D) Constitution of USA
Explanation: The idea of having a Preamble — a concise introductory statement expressing the guiding philosophy, objectives, and source of authority behind the Constitution — was borrowed from the Constitution of the United States of America. The Indian Preamble’s opening words, “WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA…”, closely echo the opening of the US Preamble, “We the People of the United States…”, signifying that the ultimate source of the Constitution’s authority is the people of India themselves.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Source of inspiration | United States (US) Constitution |
| Opening phrase of Indian Preamble | “WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA…” |
| Opening phrase of US Preamble | “We the People of the United States…” |
| Significance | Establishes that sovereignty and authority flow from the people of India |
| Constitutional status of Preamble | Part of the Basic Structure Doctrine (Kesavananda Bharati case, 1973) |
| Amendability | Amended only once so far (42nd Amendment, 1976) |
3. From which of the countries, Constitution of India has adopted fundamental duties ?
(A) USA
(B) UK
(C) Erstwhile USSR
(D) Canada
Answer: (C) Erstwhile USSR
Explanation: The concept of Fundamental Duties, incorporated in Part IVA (Article 51A) of the Indian Constitution by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976, was borrowed from the Constitution of the erstwhile Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). This addition was made on the recommendation of the Swaran Singh Committee, set up during the Emergency period to suggest constitutional amendments. Originally there were 10 Fundamental Duties, and an 11th duty was later added by the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Concept | Fundamental Duties |
| Source country | Erstwhile USSR (Russia) |
| Part & Article | Part IVA, Article 51A |
| Introduced by | 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 |
| Recommending committee | Swaran Singh Committee |
| Original number of duties | 10 |
| Current number of duties | 11 |
| 11th duty added by | 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002 (duty to provide education for children aged 6–14 years) |
| Nature of Fundamental Duties | Non-justiciable (not enforceable in courts) |
4. The British, conceded the demand for partition of India under
(A) Cripps Mission
(B) Mountbatten Plan, 1947
(C) Simla Pact, 1946
(D) Cabinet Mission Plan
Answer: (B) Mountbatten Plan, 1947
Explanation: The Mountbatten Plan, announced on 3rd June, 1947 (also known as the “3rd June Plan”), was the formal proposal put forward by Lord Mountbatten, the last Viceroy of British India, under which the British Government officially conceded to the demand for the partition of India into two independent dominions — India and Pakistan. This plan was subsequently formalized and given legal effect through the Indian Independence Act, 1947, passed by the British Parliament on 18th July, 1947, leading to independence on 14th/15th August, 1947.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Plan | Mountbatten Plan, 1947 (also called “3rd June Plan”) |
| Date announced | 3rd June, 1947 |
| Proposed by | Lord Mountbatten, last Viceroy of British India |
| Key decision | British Government formally agreed to partition India into two dominions — India and Pakistan |
| Legal formalization | Indian Independence Act, 1947 (passed 18 July 1947; came into force 14/15 August 1947) |
| Cripps Mission (for contrast) | 1942 mission proposing Dominion Status after WWII — rejected by Congress; did NOT concede partition |
| Cabinet Mission Plan (for contrast) | 1946 mission that proposed a federal structure and led to the formation of the Constituent Assembly; initially opposed a full partition, favoring a loosely federated India |
5. The first session of the Constituent Assembly was held on
(A) December 9, 1946
(B) November 26, 1949
(C) August 15, 1947
(D) January 26, 1946
Answer: (A) December 9, 1946
Explanation: The first session of the Constituent Assembly of India was held on 9th December, 1946, at the Constitution Hall in New Delhi (now the Central Hall of Parliament House). Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha served as the temporary/interim Chairman for this inaugural session, before Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the permanent President two days later, on 11th December 1946.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Date of first session | 9th December, 1946 |
| Venue | Constitution Hall, New Delhi (now Central Hall of Parliament House) |
| Temporary Chairman | Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha |
| Permanent President (elected 2 days later) | Dr. Rajendra Prasad, on 11th December 1946 |
| Boycotted by | Muslim League members (demanding separate Pakistan) |
| Basis of Assembly’s formation | Cabinet Mission Plan, 1946 |
6. Which of the following was not one of the features of Government of India Act, 1935 ?
(A) Bicameral legislature
(B) Dyarchy of centre and the provinces
(C) Provincial autonomy
(D) All India Federation
Answer: (B) Dyarchy of centre and the provinces
Explanation: The Government of India Act, 1935, did NOT introduce Dyarchy at the Centre-Provinces level in the way this option suggests; instead, it abolished Dyarchy in the provinces (which had been introduced earlier by the Government of India Act, 1919) and replaced it with full Provincial Autonomy. However, the 1935 Act did introduce a form of Dyarchy at the Centre (Federal level) — dividing federal subjects between “Reserved” subjects (controlled by the Governor-General) and “Transferred” subjects (controlled by ministers responsible to the legislature) — but NOT a “Dyarchy of centre and provinces” as a combined single feature, which is why this option, as specifically worded, is the correct answer for what was NOT a feature. The actual features of the 1935 Act included Provincial Autonomy, an All-India Federation (never came into force), Bicameral legislatures in most provinces, and Dyarchy at the Centre only.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Features actually introduced by GoI Act, 1935 | Provincial Autonomy; All-India Federation (proposed, never came into force); Bicameral legislatures in several provinces; Dyarchy at the Centre (Federal level) only |
| What Dyarchy in provinces refers to | Introduced by the Government of India Act, 1919, and abolished by the 1935 Act |
| Dyarchy at Centre under 1935 Act | Divided federal subjects into “Reserved” (Governor-General controlled) and “Transferred” (minister-responsible) |
| Why Option B is NOT a feature | The 1935 Act ended provincial Dyarchy and introduced Dyarchy only at the Centre — not a combined “Centre and provinces” Dyarchy structure |
7. The Government of India Act, 1935 vested the residuary power in the
(A) British Parliament
(B) State Legislature
(C) Federal Legislature
(D) Governor-General
Answer: (D) Governor-General
Explanation: Under the Government of India Act, 1935, residuary powers (i.e., powers not specifically enumerated in the Federal List, Provincial List, or Concurrent List) were vested in the Governor-General of India, acting in his discretion. This was a unique feature compared to later Indian constitutional arrangements — under the current Indian Constitution, residuary powers rest with the Union Parliament (as per Article 248 and Entry 97 of the Union List), not with any single individual authority like a Governor-General.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Act | Government of India Act, 1935 |
| Residuary powers vested in | Governor-General (acting in his discretion) |
| Contrast with current Indian Constitution | Residuary powers now rest with the Union Parliament (Article 248, Entry 97 of Union List) |
| Reason for this arrangement in 1935 Act | Reflected continued British colonial control, ensuring ultimate authority remained with the Crown’s representative |
| Lists established under 1935 Act | Federal List, Provincial List, Concurrent List (basis for India’s later Union, State, and Concurrent Lists) |
8. The Chairman of the Constituent Assembly was
(A) C. Rajagopalachari
(B) Jai Prakash Narayan
(C) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(D) Jawaharlal Nehru
Answer: (C) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
Explanation: Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the permanent President (Chairman) of the Constituent Assembly of India on 11th December 1946, two days after the Assembly’s first session on 9th December 1946. He presided over the Assembly throughout the nearly three-year constitution-making process and later went on to become the first President of independent India. Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha had earlier served as the temporary/interim Chairman only for the first sitting on 9th December 1946.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Permanent President/Chairman of Constituent Assembly | Dr. Rajendra Prasad |
| Date elected | 11th December 1946 |
| First session date | 9th December 1946 |
| Temporary/interim Chairman (first sitting only) | Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha |
| Later role of Dr. Rajendra Prasad | First President of independent India |
| Chairman of the Drafting Committee (different role) | Dr. B. R. Ambedkar |
| Objective Resolution mover (different role) | Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru |
9. India has borrowed the scheme of federation i.e. ‘Union of States” from which country?
(A) Ireland
(B) Canada
(C) USA
(D) Russia
Answer: (B) Canada
Explanation: The concept and terminology of “Union of States,” along with a federal scheme where the Centre holds a stronger position relative to the States (including possession of residuary powers), was borrowed from the Canadian Constitution. This model was considered more suitable for India’s needs at independence, given the priority placed on national unity and integration, as opposed to the more decentralized American federal model where states voluntarily came together and retain greater autonomy.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Feature | “Union of States” federal scheme with strong Centre |
| Source country | Canada |
| Key similarity to Canadian model | Residuary powers vested with the Union/Centre, not the States (unlike USA) |
| Constitutional reflection | Article 1 – “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States” |
| Contrast with USA’s federal model | American federation formed via voluntary agreement of independent states; more state autonomy, residuary powers with states |
| Other Canadian-inspired features | Quasi-federal system with unitary bias; strong central authority in distribution of powers |
10. The framers of the Constitution borrowed the concept of Directive principles from
(A) Constitution of Switzerland
(B) Constitution of Ireland
(C) Government of India Act, 1935
(D) Constitution of USA
Answer: (B) Constitution of Ireland
Explanation: The Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP), enshrined in Part IV (Articles 36–51) of the Indian Constitution, were borrowed from the Constitution of Ireland, which itself had adopted a similar concept from the Spanish Constitution. These principles serve as guidelines or instructions for the State to follow while formulating policies and enacting laws, aiming to establish a welfare state by promoting social and economic democracy. Unlike Fundamental Rights, the Directive Principles are non-justiciable — meaning they cannot be enforced directly by courts — but they are considered fundamental in the governance of the country as per Article 37.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Concept | Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) |
| Source country | Ireland |
| Original source (before Ireland) | Ireland itself borrowed this concept from Spain |
| Part & Articles | Part IV, Articles 36–51 |
| Governing Article on enforceability | Article 37 – DPSPs are non-justiciable but “fundamental in the governance of the country” |
| Purpose | Establish social and economic democracy; guide the State in policy-making toward a welfare state |
11. Which of the following Articles describe a person voluntarily acquiring citizenship of a foreign state not to be a citizen?
(A) Article 9
(B) Article 8
(C) Article 7
(D) Article 5
Answer: (A) Article 9
Explanation: Article 9 of the Indian Constitution, under Part II (Citizenship), provides that if a person has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign state, they shall NOT be treated as a citizen of India. This provision reflects and reinforces India’s concept of Single Citizenship, meaning Indian citizenship and foreign citizenship cannot be held simultaneously by voluntary choice of the individual (India does not generally recognize dual citizenship, though the separate, more limited status of “Overseas Citizen of India” (OCI) does exist).
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Article | Article 9 |
| Part of Constitution | Part II (Citizenship) |
| Subject matter | Persons who voluntarily acquire citizenship of a foreign state shall NOT be citizens of India |
| Related Articles in Part II | Article 5 – citizenship by domicile; Article 6 – migrants from Pakistan; Article 7 – migrants to Pakistan; Article 8 – Persons of Indian origin residing outside India |
| Related concept reinforced | India’s policy of Single Citizenship (no dual citizenship) |
12. The special status of Jammu & Kashmir implies the state as
(A) a separate judiciary
(B) a separate constitution
(C) a separate defense force
(D) All the above
Answer: (B) a separate constitution
Explanation: Prior to the abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019, Jammu and Kashmir’s special status under the Indian Constitution allowed it to have its own separate state Constitution (the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, which came into force on 26th January 1957) — a privilege unique among Indian states, since all other states are governed solely by the single Constitution of India. However, J&K did NOT have a fully separate judiciary independent of India’s judicial system (the Supreme Court of India’s jurisdiction extended to J&K), nor did it have a separate defence force (national defence remained exclusively under the control of the Union Government).
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Special provision (historical) | Article 370 |
| J&K’s separate Constitution | Came into force 26th January 1957; ceased to exist after August 2019 |
| Did J&K have a separate judiciary? | No — Supreme Court of India’s jurisdiction extended to J&K |
| Did J&K have a separate defence force? | No — national defence remained solely under Union Government control |
| Major constitutional change | Article 370 abrogated on 5 August 2019; J&K’s separate Constitution ceased; state reorganized into two Union Territories (Jammu & Kashmir, and Ladakh) effective 31 October 2019 |
13. Under the Government of India Act, 1935, the Federal Court had
(A) original jurisdiction only
(B) appellate jurisdiction only
(C) advisory jurisdiction only
(D) All the above
Answer: (D) All the above
Explanation: The Government of India Act, 1935, established the Federal Court of India (the predecessor to today’s Supreme Court of India), which was granted three distinct types of jurisdiction: Original Jurisdiction (to resolve disputes between the Federation and the Provinces, or between Provinces themselves), Appellate Jurisdiction (to hear appeals from High Courts in certain civil and criminal cases), and Advisory Jurisdiction (to give its opinion on questions of law referred to it by the Governor-General). This comprehensive jurisdictional structure of the Federal Court laid important groundwork for the later powers granted to the Supreme Court of India under the Constitution of 1950.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Court established | Federal Court of India (under Government of India Act, 1935) |
| Original Jurisdiction | Disputes between Federation and Provinces, or between Provinces |
| Appellate Jurisdiction | Appeals from High Courts in specified civil and criminal matters |
| Advisory Jurisdiction | Opinion on questions of law referred by the Governor-General |
| First Chief Justice of Federal Court | Sir Maurice Gwyer |
| Successor institution | Supreme Court of India (established 1950, under the Constitution) |
14. For the first time, the system of appeals from India to Privy Council in England was introduced by the Charter of
(A) 1608
(B) 1683
(C) 1726
(D) 1833
Answer: (C) 1726
Explanation: The Charter of 1726, issued by King George I, established Mayor’s Courts in the three Presidency towns of Madras, Bombay, and Calcutta, and for the first time introduced the system of appeals from these Indian courts to the Privy Council in England. This was a significant development in the judicial history of colonial India, as it established a formal hierarchical connection between the Indian judicial system and the highest judicial authority in England, laying an early foundation for the appellate court structure that would evolve over subsequent centuries.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Charter | Charter of 1726 |
| Issued by | King George I |
| Key provision | Established Mayor’s Courts in Madras, Bombay, and Calcutta (the three Presidency towns) |
| Major significance | First introduced the system of appeals from Indian courts to the Privy Council in England |
| Other charters (for comparison) | Charter of 1600 – established the East India Company; Charter of 1683 – established Admiralty Courts to deal with piracy and maritime cases; Charter of 1833 – made the Governor-General of Bengal the “Governor-General of India,” centralizing legislative power |
15. Under the charter of 1687, a Mayor’s Court was established at Madras. The Mayor had to be
(A) Elected by the Alderman and the Burgesses every year
(B) Nominated by the company
(C) Senior-most Alderman to be next year
(D) Nominated by the company on the recommendation of the outgoing Mayor.
Answer: (A) Elected by the Alderman and the Burgesses every year
Explanation: The Charter of 1687, issued by the East India Company, established a Municipal Corporation and a Mayor’s Court at Madras — one of the earliest formal judicial institutions set up by the British in India. Under this charter, the Mayor of Madras was to be elected annually by the Aldermen and Burgesses (members of the municipal corporation), following a democratic-style election process rather than being directly appointed or nominated by the East India Company. This system reflected an early, limited attempt at self-governing municipal administration in colonial India, modeled loosely on English municipal traditions.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Charter | Charter of 1687 |
| Issued by | East India Company |
| Key establishment | Municipal Corporation and Mayor’s Court at Madras |
| Method of selecting the Mayor | Elected annually by the Aldermen and Burgesses |
| Significance | One of the earliest instances of a quasi-democratic municipal governance structure in colonial India |
16. The east India Company was established by the British Crown in the year
(A) 1600 AD
(B) 1605 AD
(C) 1726 AD
(D) 1857 AD
Answer: (A) 1600 AD
Explanation: The English East India Company was established on 31st December, 1600, when Queen Elizabeth I granted a Royal Charter to a group of London merchants, giving them exclusive trading rights with the East Indies (which included India and other parts of Asia) for an initial period of 15 years. This Charter marked the formal beginning of the Company’s operations, eventually leading to its expansion from a trading enterprise into a major political and administrative power that came to control large parts of the Indian subcontinent over the following two centuries, until the Crown formally took over direct governance after the Revolt of 1857.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Establishment year | 1600 AD (Charter granted 31st December 1600) |
| Granted by | Queen Elizabeth I |
| Initial purpose | Exclusive trading rights with the East Indies for 15 years |
| Evolution | Grew from a trading company into a major political/administrative power controlling large parts of India |
| End of Company rule | After the Revolt of 1857; Government of India Act, 1858 transferred control to the British Crown (start of direct Crown rule / British Raj) |
WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper – 2017
1. In the Preamble of the Constitution of India the word ‘Secular’ was incorporated by
(A) 1st Amendment of the Constitution of India
(B) 15th Amendment of the Constitution of India
(C) 27th Amendment of the Constitution of India
(D) 42nd Amendment of the Constitution of India
Answer: (D) 42nd Amendment of the Constitution of India
Explanation: The word “Secular” was inserted into the Preamble of the Indian Constitution by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, along with the words “Socialist” and “Integrity.” This amendment, enacted during the National Emergency (1975–1977) under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s government, changed the Preamble’s description of India from “Sovereign Democratic Republic” to “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic.”
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment | 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 |
| Words added to Preamble | “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity” |
| Original (1950) Preamble wording | “Sovereign Democratic Republic” |
| Amended Preamble wording | “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic” |
| Enacted during | National Emergency (1975–1977), PM Indira Gandhi |
| Number of times Preamble amended | Only once (1976) |
2. National Capital Territory of Delhi has been constituted by
(A) 69th Amendment
(B) 75th Amendment
(C) 81st Amendment
(D) 52nd Amendment
Answer: (A) 69th Amendment
Explanation: The Constitution (Sixty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1991, inserted Articles 239AA and 239AB into the Constitution, granting Delhi the special status of “National Capital Territory of Delhi” (NCT of Delhi), along with its own Legislative Assembly and a Council of Ministers headed by a Chief Minister. However, key subjects like Police, Public Order, and Land remain under the control of the Union Government, administered through the Lieutenant Governor.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment | 69th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1991 |
| Articles inserted | Article 239AA and 239AB |
| New nomenclature | National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCT of Delhi) |
| Key provisions | Legislative Assembly for Delhi; Council of Ministers headed by Chief Minister |
| Subjects excluded from Delhi Assembly’s control | Public Order, Police, and Land (remain with Union Government) |
| Administrative head | Lieutenant Governor (represents the Union Government) |
| Related Act | Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act, 1991 |
3. The distribution of power between Centre and the States is based on the scheme provided in
(A) Minto-Morley Reforms, 1909
(B) Montagui-Chelmsford Act, 1919
(C) Government of India Act, 1935
(D) Indian Independence Act, 1947
Answer: (C) Government of India Act, 1935
Explanation: The scheme for distribution of powers between the Centre and the States/Provinces in the current Indian Constitution — divided into the Union List, State List, and Concurrent List (Seventh Schedule) — is based on and modeled after the three-fold division of legislative powers (Federal List, Provincial List, and Concurrent List) that was first introduced by the Government of India Act, 1935. Although the all-India federation proposed by this Act never actually came into force, the underlying scheme for distributing legislative subjects between different levels of government was retained and adapted by the framers of the Indian Constitution.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Source of power-distribution scheme | Government of India Act, 1935 |
| Original three lists (1935 Act) | Federal List, Provincial List, Concurrent List |
| Current equivalent lists (Indian Constitution) | Union List, State List, Concurrent List (Seventh Schedule) |
| Why the 1935 Act’s federation never fully worked | Princely States refused to join the proposed All-India Federation |
4. In the event of changing the name of the State or for creation of a new State, the Constitution of India is required to be amended by Parliament by a
(A) simple majority as required under Articles 107 and 108.
(B) majority of total members of both the Houses under Article 368.
(C) special majority under Article 368.
(D) simple majority after obtained opinion of the concerned State under Article 3 of the Constitution.
Answer: (A) simple majority as required under Articles 107 and 108
Explanation: Under Article 3 of the Constitution, Parliament has the power to form new states or alter the name/boundaries of existing states through a simple legislative process, treated like an ordinary law — requiring only a simple majority of members present and voting, as per the general legislative procedure under Articles 107 and 108. While the President must first recommend such a bill and refer it to the concerned State Legislature for its views, that opinion is advisory only and NOT binding on Parliament, and no special majority under Article 368 (as required for constitutional amendments) is needed.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Governing Article for creation/renaming of States | Article 3 |
| Type of majority required | Simple majority (as per ordinary legislative procedure under Articles 107 & 108) |
| Role of President | Must recommend the bill before its introduction in Parliament |
| Role of concerned State Legislature | Consulted for its views, but the opinion is advisory only, NOT binding |
| Contrast with Article 368 (constitutional amendments) | Requires special majority (2/3rd of members present & voting + majority of total membership), and for federal provisions, ratification by half the states |
5. Which of the following legislation brought the character of Indian Government from ‘Unitary’ to ‘Federal’ ?
(A) Indian Council Act, 1909
(B) Government of India Act, 1919
(C) Government of India Act, 1935
(D) Indian Independence Act, 1947
Answer: (C) Government of India Act, 1935
Explanation: The Government of India Act, 1935, sought to transform the character of Indian governance from a unitary system to a federal one by proposing an All-India Federation comprising British Indian provinces and Princely States, along with a clear three-fold division of legislative subjects (Federal List, Provincial List, and Concurrent List). Although the proposed federation never actually came into force due to the Princely States’ refusal to join, the Act introduced significant federal features and Provincial Autonomy, marking the first substantive attempt to move India’s governance structure toward federalism.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Act | Government of India Act, 1935 |
| Key feature | First attempt to shift India’s governance from unitary to federal |
| Structural changes proposed | All-India Federation (British provinces + Princely States); three-fold division of legislative subjects |
| Why the federation failed to materialize | Princely States refused to join |
| Feature that did take effect | Provincial Autonomy |
| Other Acts (for comparison) | Indian Council Act, 1909 (Morley-Minto Reforms) – introduced separate electorates, no federal shift; Government of India Act, 1919 (Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms) – introduced Dyarchy in provinces, still largely unitary; Indian Independence Act, 1947 – dealt with independence/partition, not the federal structural shift |
6. From which of the following Constitutions the Indian Constitution is not borrowed from
(A) Constitution of USA
(B) Constitution of Germany
(C) Constitution of Canada
(D) Constitution of China
Answer: (D) Constitution of China
Explanation: The Indian Constitution did NOT borrow any significant features from the Constitution of China. Instead, the framers of the Indian Constitution drew inspiration from a wide range of democratic constitutions around the world, including the USA (Fundamental Rights, Judicial Review, Independence of Judiciary), Canada (federal scheme with a strong Centre, “Union of States” terminology), Ireland (Directive Principles of State Policy, method of election of the President), UK (Parliamentary system, Rule of Law), Australia (Concurrent List, freedom of trade and commerce), Germany (Emergency provisions, particularly the suspension of Fundamental Rights during Emergency), and USSR (Fundamental Duties, Five-Year Plans concept). China, being a communist state with a fundamentally different governance philosophy, was not a source for India’s democratic constitutional framework.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Country NOT a source for Indian Constitution | China |
| USA’s contribution | Fundamental Rights, Judicial Review, Independence of Judiciary, Impeachment procedure, Post of Vice-President |
| Canada’s contribution | Federal scheme with strong Centre, “Union of States” terminology, residuary powers with Centre |
| Germany’s contribution | Suspension of Fundamental Rights during Emergency (Weimar Constitution influence) |
| Ireland’s contribution | Directive Principles of State Policy, method of Presidential election, nomination of Rajya Sabha members |
| UK’s contribution | Parliamentary system, Rule of Law, Single citizenship, Bicameralism, Prerogative writs |
| Australia’s contribution | Concurrent List, freedom of trade/commerce/intercourse |
| USSR’s contribution | Fundamental Duties, Five-Year Plans (economic philosophy influence) |
7. By which amendment Act ‘Unity of the Nation’ was substituted by ‘Unity and integrity of the Nation’ in the Preamble of the Constitution ?
(A) 42nd Amendment Act, 1976
(B) 45th Amendment Act, 1980
(C) 44th Amendment Act, 1979
(D) None of the above
Answer: (A) 42nd Amendment Act, 1976
Explanation: The Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, substituted the phrase “unity of the Nation” with “unity and integrity of the Nation” in the Fraternity clause of the Preamble. This same amendment also added the words “Socialist” and “Secular” to the Preamble’s description of India, making it “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic,” while the Fraternity clause was expanded to read “…assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation.”
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment | 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 |
| Original Preamble phrase | “…unity of the Nation” |
| Amended Preamble phrase | “…unity and integrity of the Nation” |
| Other words added by the same amendment | “Socialist” and “Secular” |
| Enacted during | National Emergency (1975–1977), PM Indira Gandhi |
| Number of times Preamble amended | Only once, in 1976 |
| Related Fundamental Duty (different provision, similar wording) | Article 51A(c) — duty “to uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India” (also introduced by 42nd Amendment) |
8. The Chairman of the Constituent Assembly was
(A) Jawaharlal Nehru
(B) Jai Prakash Narayan
(C) C. Rajagopalachari
(D) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
Answer: (D) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
Explanation: Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the permanent President (Chairman) of the Constituent Assembly of India on 11th December 1946, two days after the Assembly’s first session on 9th December 1946. He presided over the Assembly throughout the nearly three-year constitution-making process and subsequently became the first President of independent India. Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha had earlier served only as the temporary/interim Chairman for the very first sitting.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Permanent President/Chairman of Constituent Assembly | Dr. Rajendra Prasad |
| Date elected | 11th December 1946 |
| First session date | 9th December 1946 |
| Temporary/interim Chairman (first sitting only) | Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha |
| Later role of Dr. Rajendra Prasad | First President of independent India |
| Chairman of the Drafting Committee (different role) | Dr. B. R. Ambedkar |
| Objective Resolution mover (different role) | Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru |
9. The First Commentary to the Constitution of India is written
(A) Dr. D. D. Basu
(B) Justice Vivian Bose
(C) Dr. Bijon Kumar Mukherjee
(D) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
Answer: (A) Dr. D. D. Basu
Explanation: Dr. Durga Das Basu (D. D. Basu) is widely credited with writing the first detailed commentary on the Constitution of India, titled “Commentary on the Constitution of India,” first published in 1950 — the same year the Constitution came into force. This comprehensive multi-volume work has become one of the most authoritative and widely cited legal commentaries on Indian constitutional law, extensively referenced by courts, lawyers, and scholars for its in-depth analysis of constitutional provisions, case law, and comparative constitutional perspectives.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Author of first Commentary on the Constitution of India | Dr. D. D. Basu (Durga Das Basu) |
| Title of the work | “Commentary on the Constitution of India” |
| Year first published | 1950 |
| Significance | Considered one of the most authoritative legal commentaries on Indian constitutional law; extensively cited in courts |
| Other notable constitutional scholars/jurists (for comparison) | M. V. Pylee – author of “Constitutional Government in India” and other works; H. M. Seervai – author of “Constitutional Law of India,” another highly regarded commentary; Justice Vivian Bose and Dr. Bijon Kumar Mukherjee were notable judges but not primarily known as constitutional commentary authors |
10. The Constitution 96th Amendment Act, 2011 altered the language of Oriya in 8th Schedule as
(A) Oriyan
(B) Odiya
(C) Orriya
(D) Odia
Answer: (D) Odia
Explanation: The Constitution (Ninety-sixth Amendment) Act, 2011, officially changed the name of the language “Oriya,” as listed in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution, to “Odia.” This amendment was undertaken alongside a broader move by the Odisha state government to standardize and correct the official spelling and pronunciation of both the state’s name (from “Orissa” to “Odisha”) and its language (from “Oriya” to “Odia”), aligning the official terminology more closely with the local Odia pronunciation and cultural identity. The state’s name change from Orissa to Odisha had been carried out slightly earlier, in 2011, through the Orissa (Alteration of Name) Act.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment | 96th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2011 |
| Change made | “Oriya” (language name in Eighth Schedule) changed to “Odia” |
| Related state name change | “Orissa” changed to “Odisha” (via the Orissa (Alteration of Name) Act, 2011) |
| Reason for change | To align official spelling/pronunciation with the local Odia language and cultural identity |
| Related Act for the state name change | Orissa (Alteration of Name) Act, 2011 (a separate legislative Act, distinct from this Constitutional Amendment for the language name) |
| Schedule affected | Eighth Schedule (List of Scheduled/Recognized Languages) |
11. Expression ‘socialist’ in the Preamble of the Constitution of India has been added by taking the views of
(A) Marx and Laski
(B) Marx and Gandhi
(C) Rousseau and Gandhi
(D) Gandhi and Hegel
Answer: (A) Marx and Laski
Explanation: The term “Socialist” in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution, inserted by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976, is generally understood to reflect a blend of ideological influences, primarily drawing on the socio-economic philosophies associated with Karl Marx (proponent of scientific socialism and class-based economic analysis) and Harold Laski (a prominent British political theorist known for his writings on democratic socialism and the welfare state). However, India’s brand of “socialism” as reflected in the Constitution is often described as “democratic socialism” — a mixed-economy model blending public and private sector participation, rather than the rigid, state-controlled communist model associated purely with Marxist theory.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Word | “Socialist” |
| Added by | 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 |
| Ideological influences credited | Karl Marx and Harold Laski |
| Nature of India’s “socialism” | Democratic socialism — mixed economy blending public/private sectors, welfare-state orientation |
| Contrast with rigid Communism | India’s socialism does NOT mean complete state ownership/control of all means of production, unlike classical Marxist-Leninist states |
| Related earlier political milestone | Avadi Session of Indian National Congress (1955) — adopted “Socialistic Pattern of Society” as a policy goal, a precursor in spirit to this later constitutional insertion |
WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper – 2016
1. The demand for a Constituent Assembly was for the first time authoritatively conceded by the British Government, though in an indirect way, through
(A) Shimla Conference
(B) August Offer (1940)
(C) Wavell Plan
(D) None of the above
Answer: (B) August Offer (1940)
Explanation: The August Offer of 1940, made by the then Viceroy Lord Linlithgow on behalf of the British Government, was the first occasion on which the British indirectly acknowledged and conceded the demand for a Constituent Assembly for India. While the demand for a Constituent Assembly had first been formally raised by the Indian National Congress in 1934 (with M.N. Roy often credited as the original proponent of the idea in 1934), it was only through the August Offer of 1940 that the British Government indicated, in principle, that the framing of India’s future constitution should primarily be the responsibility of Indians themselves, through a body representative of the Indian people — laying early groundwork for what eventually became the Constituent Assembly formed under the Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Event | August Offer, 1940 |
| Made by | Lord Linlithgow (Viceroy of India), on behalf of British Government |
| Significance | First indirect British acknowledgment of the demand for a Constituent Assembly |
| Original proponent of the idea (1934) | M. N. Roy is often credited as first suggesting a Constituent Assembly, later formally adopted as a demand by the Indian National Congress in 1934–1935 |
| Later concrete step | Cabinet Mission Plan (1946) — actually established the Constituent Assembly |
| Shimla Conference (for comparison) | 1945, called by Lord Wavell to discuss constitutional issues; failed due to Congress-Muslim League disagreements over representation |
| Wavell Plan (for comparison) | Refers to the plan associated with the Shimla Conference, 1945, focused on forming an interim government, not specifically the Constituent Assembly |
2. Indian Legislature became “bicameral” through which of the following ?
(A) The Morley-Minto Reforms
(B) Montague-Chelmsford Reforms
(C) Government of India Act, 1935
(D) Indian Councils Act, 1892
Answer: (B) Montague-Chelmsford Reforms
Explanation: The Government of India Act, 1919 (commonly known as the Montague-Chelmsford Reforms, named after Secretary of State Edwin Montagu and Viceroy Lord Chelmsford) introduced bicameralism at the central level for the first time in Indian legislative history. It established a two-chamber central legislature consisting of the Council of State (Upper House) and the Legislative Assembly (Lower House). This was a significant step away from the earlier unicameral legislative structures that existed under previous Acts like the Indian Councils Act, 1892, and the Morley-Minto Reforms (Indian Councils Act, 1909).
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Reform that introduced Bicameralism | Montague-Chelmsford Reforms (Government of India Act, 1919) |
| Named after | Edwin Montagu (Secretary of State) and Lord Chelmsford (Viceroy) |
| Upper House established | Council of State |
| Lower House established | Legislative Assembly |
| Other key features of GoI Act, 1919 | Introduced Dyarchy in the provinces (division of subjects into “Reserved” and “Transferred”) |
| Morley-Minto Reforms (for comparison) | Indian Councils Act, 1909 — introduced separate electorates for Muslims, expanded legislative councils, but did NOT introduce bicameralism |
| Indian Councils Act, 1892 (for comparison) | Expanded the size of legislative councils and introduced limited indirect elections, but legislature remained unicameral |
3. Before 26 November, 1949 which among the following was the governing law of India ?
(A) The Cabinet Mission Plan
(B) Government of India Act, 1935
(C) Government of India Act, 1919
(D) Government of India Act, 1909
Answer: (B) Government of India Act, 1935
Explanation: Before the Constitution of India was adopted on 26th November, 1949 (and came into force on 26th January, 1950), India was governed under the provisions of the Government of India Act, 1935, as adapted and modified after independence in 1947. This Act, with necessary modifications made through the Indian Independence Act, 1947 (which removed provisions related to British paramountcy and the Secretary of State’s authority), continued to serve as the functional governing framework for India during the transitional period between independence (1947) and the adoption of the new Constitution (1949–1950).
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Governing law before Constitution’s adoption (26 Nov 1949) | Government of India Act, 1935 (as adapted post-1947) |
| Adaptation made through | Indian Independence Act, 1947 — removed provisions on British paramountcy, Secretary of State’s authority |
| Duration of this transitional governance | From 15th August 1947 (Independence) until 26th January 1950 (Constitution’s commencement) |
| Why not the 1919 or 1909 Acts | These were earlier, already superseded by the 1935 Act well before independence |
| Why not the Cabinet Mission Plan | The Cabinet Mission Plan (1946) was a political proposal for the Constituent Assembly’s formation, not an actual governing legal framework/constitution |
| Significant continuity | Many administrative, judicial, and governance structures established by the 1935 Act were carried forward and adapted into India’s new Constitution once it came into force |
4. Dr. Rajendra Prasad was not a member of which of the following committees of the constituent assembly ?
(A) Committee on the rules of procedure
(B) Finance and Staff Committee
(C) Ad hoc Committee on National Flag
(D) Order of Business Committee
Answer: (C) Ad hoc Committee on National Flag
Explanation: Dr. Rajendra Prasad, as the President of the Constituent Assembly, was a member and often chairman of several key procedural and administrative committees, including the Committee on Rules of Procedure, the Finance and Staff Committee, and the Order of Business Committee — all of which were closely tied to the day-to-day functioning and administration of the Assembly itself. However, the Ad hoc Committee on the National Flag, which was specifically constituted to decide on the design of independent India’s national flag, was chaired by Dr. Rajendra Prasad’s colleague J.B. Kripalani, and Dr. Prasad was not a member of this particular committee, as it was a more specialized, symbolic/ceremonial task delegated to a separate dedicated group.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Committee Dr. Rajendra Prasad was NOT a member of | Ad hoc Committee on the National Flag |
| Chairman of the Flag Committee | J. B. Kripalani |
| Committees Dr. Rajendra Prasad WAS part of | Committee on Rules of Procedure; Finance and Staff Committee; Order of Business Committee (often as Chairman, given his role as Assembly President) |
| Role of Rajendra Prasad in Constituent Assembly | President/permanent Chairman, overseeing administrative and procedural committees |
| National Flag adoption date | 22nd July, 1947 (by the Constituent Assembly) |
5. Which among the following best supported the idea of inclusion of fundamental rights in our constitution ?
(A) Simon Commission, 1927
(B) Nehru Committee Report, 1928
(C) Swaraj Bill, 1895
(D) Sapru Committee Report on Constitutional proposals, 1945
Answer: (B) Nehru Committee Report, 1928
Explanation: The Nehru Committee Report of 1928, chaired by Motilal Nehru, was a landmark document prepared by an all-party committee of Indians in response to the British challenge (posed by Lord Birkenhead) to produce a constitution acceptable to all sections of Indian society. This report was one of the earliest and most significant Indian-drafted proposals to explicitly demand the inclusion of a set of Fundamental Rights (including rights to free expression, equality, and protection of minorities) in any future constitution for India, laying important ideological groundwork that would later influence the framers of the actual Indian Constitution’s Fundamental Rights provisions (Part III).
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Report | Nehru Committee Report, 1928 |
| Chaired by | Motilal Nehru |
| Context | Prepared in response to Lord Birkenhead’s challenge to Indians to draft an agreeable constitution |
| Key contribution | One of the earliest Indian demands for explicit inclusion of Fundamental Rights in a future constitution |
| Other notable features of the Report | Also proposed Dominion Status for India (a more moderate demand compared to full independence, which was later superseded by more radical demands) |
| Simon Commission, 1927 (for comparison) | An all-British commission (no Indian members) that reviewed constitutional reforms; boycotted by most Indian political parties; not focused on advocating Fundamental Rights |
| Sapru Committee Report, 1945 (for comparison) | Focused more on constitutional proposals for communal harmony and minority safeguards during the transition period, closer to independence |
6. Which of the following states in India is exempted from reservation for Scheduled Castes in Panchayati Raj institutions ?
(A) Rajasthan
(B) Assam
(C) Arunachal Pradesh
(D) Sikim
Answer: (C) Arunachal Pradesh
Explanation: Arunachal Pradesh is exempted from the provisions relating to reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes (SCs) in Panchayati Raj institutions under the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992. This exemption exists because Arunachal Pradesh has a negligible or nil Scheduled Caste population, as the vast majority of its population consists of Scheduled Tribes (STs). Since the very rationale for SC reservation (protecting a socially disadvantaged population that requires representation) does not practically apply given the demographic composition of the state, the Constitution appropriately exempts Arunachal Pradesh from this specific reservation requirement, while ST reservations remain fully applicable and highly relevant there.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| State exempted from SC reservation in Panchayats | Arunachal Pradesh |
| Reason for exemption | Negligible/nil Scheduled Caste population in the state |
| Governing Amendment | 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992 (Panchayati Raj provisions, Part IX) |
| ST reservation status in Arunachal Pradesh | Fully applicable and significant, given the state’s predominantly tribal population |
| Related Sixth Schedule fact (different context) | Arunachal Pradesh is also NOT covered under the Sixth Schedule (unlike Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, Mizoram) — a separate but related “exception” fact about this state |
7. Choose the incorrect sentence among the following :
(A) The objective resolution passed by Pt. Nehru was what became the Preamble of our constitution.
(B) Preamble is enforceable in court of law.
(C) Preamble of Indian constitution has been amended only once in 1976.
(D) Jawahar Lal Nehru was the strongest advocate of socialism.
Answer: (B) Preamble is enforceable in court of law.
Explanation: The incorrect statement is (B) — the Preamble of the Indian Constitution is NOT directly enforceable in a court of law. While the Preamble is considered an integral part of the Constitution and has been used by courts (notably in the Kesavananda Bharati case, 1973) as an important interpretative aid to understand the objectives and philosophy behind constitutional provisions, and even to determine the Constitution’s “Basic Structure,” it does not itself grant any specific justiciable right that a citizen can directly enforce through litigation. The other statements are correct: the Objective Resolution moved by Nehru did form the basis of the Preamble; the Preamble has indeed been amended only once (via the 42nd Amendment, 1976); and Nehru is widely regarded as one of the strongest political advocates for socialism in India’s independence movement and subsequent nation-building.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Incorrect statement | (B) “Preamble is enforceable in court of law” |
| Correct legal position | Preamble is NOT directly enforceable/justiciable; it’s an interpretative and philosophical guide, not a source of specific rights |
| Landmark case establishing Preamble’s importance | Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala (1973) — held Preamble is part of the Constitution and reflects its Basic Structure |
| Statement (A) – correctness | TRUE — Objective Resolution (moved by Nehru, 1946) formed the basis of the Preamble |
| Statement (C) – correctness | TRUE — Preamble amended only once, via 42nd Amendment, 1976 |
| Statement (D) – correctness | TRUE — Nehru was a strong political advocate for socialism (reflected in Avadi Session, 1955, and later 42nd Amendment adding “Socialist” to Preamble) |
8. The Assam Reorganization Act. 1969 created which of the following state / states ?
(A) Meghalaya only
(B) Meghalaya and Mizoram
(C) Mizoram only
(D) Manipur, Tripura and Nagaland
Answer: (A) Meghalaya only
Explanation: The Assam Reorganisation (Meghalaya) Act, 1969, created the autonomous state of Meghalaya within Assam, carving it out from the Khasi, Jaintia, and Garo Hills districts. Initially, Meghalaya was given the status of an “Autonomous State” within Assam under this 1969 Act, with its own legislature and Council of Ministers, but with certain subjects still under the control of the Governor of Assam. Full statehood for Meghalaya was granted later, through the North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act, 1971, which came into effect on 21st January, 1972, making it a fully independent state of the Indian Union.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Act | Assam Reorganisation (Meghalaya) Act, 1969 |
| State created (initial status) | Meghalaya (given status of “Autonomous State” within Assam) |
| Districts carved out | Khasi, Jaintia, and Garo Hills |
| Full statehood granted by | North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act, 1971, effective 21st January 1972 |
| Other states created by the 1971 Act (for comparison) | Manipur and Tripura also became full states in 1972; Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh remained Union Territories at that time (became states later in 1987) |
9. Which of the following were added to the list of Union Territories in North-eastern Reorganization Act of 1971 ?
(A) Mizoram
(B) Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh
(C) Sikim, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh
(D) Tripura and Mizoram
Answer: (B) Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh
Explanation: The North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act, 1971, which came into effect on 21st January, 1972, reorganized the northeastern region of India significantly. While it granted full statehood to Meghalaya, Manipur, and Tripura, it created Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh (the latter renamed from the North-East Frontier Agency, NEFA) as new Union Territories, rather than granting them full statehood immediately. Both Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh had to wait until 1987 to attain full statehood, achieved through separate subsequent legislation (the 53rd Amendment for Mizoram, and the State of Arunachal Pradesh Act, 1986, effective 1987, for Arunachal Pradesh).
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Act | North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act, 1971 |
| Effective date | 21st January, 1972 |
| States granted full statehood by this Act | Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura |
| Union Territories created by this Act | Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh (renamed from NEFA) |
| Later full statehood for Mizoram | 1987, via 53rd Constitutional Amendment Act |
| Later full statehood for Arunachal Pradesh | 1987, via State of Arunachal Pradesh Act, 1986 |
| Sikkim’s status (for comparison) | NOT part of this 1971 Act at all — Sikkim was a separate protectorate at that time, later became an “Associate State” in 1974 (35th Amendment) and a full state in 1975 (36th Amendment) — its integration followed a completely different, later process |
10. Which among the following act is the latest ?
(A) The Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh (transfer of Territories) Act.
(B) Bihar Reorganization Act.
(C) Uttar Pradesh Reorganization Act.
(D) Madhya Pradesh Reorganization Act.
Answer: (C) Uttar Pradesh Reorganization Act
Explanation: Among the given options, the Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000, is the most recent. This Act led to the creation of the new state of Uttarakhand (initially named Uttaranchal) by carving out the hill districts from Uttar Pradesh. In comparison, the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 (which created Jharkhand) and the Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 (which created Chhattisgarh) were passed in the same year, while the Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh (Transfer of Territories) Act is a much older, comparatively minor territorial adjustment act. All three major reorganisation acts — for UP, Bihar, and MP — were passed in the same year (2000), leading to the simultaneous creation of Uttarakhand, Jharkhand, and Chhattisgarh, but the exact order/timing within that year can make Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act the technically most recent for this comparison.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Latest Act (per this question) | Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 |
| New state created | Uttarakhand (initially named “Uttaranchal”) |
| Bihar Reorganisation Act | 2000 — created Jharkhand |
| Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act | 2000 — created Chhattisgarh |
| All three (UP, Bihar, MP) reorganisation | Passed in the same year, 2000, creating three new states simultaneously in that period |
| Rajasthan and MP (Transfer of Territories) Act | An older, minor territorial adjustment act, not related to creation of a new state |
11. Rajaji Formula was suggested by C. Rajagopalachari in 1944 primarily with a view to
(A) resolve the political deadlock in the country.
(B) seek the withdrawal of communal electorates.
(C) secure greater weightage for the Congress in provincial govt.
(D) impress on the government to withdraw from India within a year of the close of Second World War.
Answer: (A) resolve the political deadlock in the country
Explanation: The Rajaji Formula (also known as the C.R. Formula), proposed by C. Rajagopalachari in 1944, was an attempt to resolve the growing political deadlock between the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League over the question of Pakistan and communal representation. The formula suggested that the Muslim League should support the Congress’s demand for independence, and in return, after the war, a plebiscite would be held in Muslim-majority areas of the North-West and North-East of India to decide on the formation of a separate sovereign state (Pakistan), subject to certain conditions like mutual agreements on defence, commerce, and communications. Although the formula was primarily aimed at breaking the political deadlock between the two major parties, it was ultimately rejected by Muslim League leader Mohammad Ali Jinnah, who felt it did not go far enough in unconditionally recognizing Pakistan, and was also criticized by some Congress leaders and Hindu organizations for conceding too much toward partition.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Formula | Rajaji Formula (C.R. Formula) |
| Proposed by | C. Rajagopalachari |
| Year | 1944 |
| Primary objective | Resolve the political deadlock between Congress and Muslim League |
| Key proposal | Muslim League to support Congress’s independence demand; post-war plebiscite in Muslim-majority NW/NE regions on formation of Pakistan |
| Outcome | Rejected by Jinnah (Muslim League) — felt insufficient recognition of Pakistan; also criticized by some Congress/Hindu leaders for conceding too much |
| Later related development | Gandhi-Jinnah talks of 1944 were based on discussions around this very formula, but also failed to reach consensus |
12. Which among the following Article deals with the rights of citizenships of certain persons of Indian origin residing outside of India ?
(A) Article 6
(B) Article 7
(C) Article 8
(D) Article 9
Answer: (C) Article 8
Explanation: Article 8 of the Indian Constitution, under Part II (Citizenship), deals specifically with the rights of citizenship of certain persons of Indian origin who are residing outside India. It provides that a person, or either of whose parents or grandparents, was born in undivided India (as defined by the Government of India Act, 1935), and who is ordinarily residing in any country outside India, can register themselves as a citizen of India by making an application to the diplomatic or consular representative of India in that country, subject to conditions prescribed by the Government of India.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Article | Article 8 |
| Part of Constitution | Part II (Citizenship) |
| Subject matter | Rights of citizenship for persons of Indian origin residing outside India |
| Eligibility condition | Person, or parent/grandparent, born in undivided India (as per Government of India Act, 1935 definition) |
| Method of acquiring citizenship under Article 8 | Registration with the Indian diplomatic/consular representative in the country of residence |
| Related Articles in Part II | Article 5 – citizenship by domicile; Article 6 – migrants from Pakistan; Article 7 – migrants to Pakistan; Article 9 – voluntary acquisition of foreign citizenship (loses Indian citizenship eligibility) |
13. January 26, 1957 is known for which of the following ?
(A) Second parliamentary term began
(B) Second general elections
(C) Second five year plan terms started
(D) Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir came into force
Answer: (D) Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir came into force
Explanation: The Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, drafted by the state’s own Constituent Assembly, came into force on 26th January, 1957 — deliberately chosen to coincide with the Republic Day of India, symbolizing J&K’s special constitutional relationship with the Indian Union under Article 370. This separate state constitution governed J&K’s internal administrative and political matters (in areas not covered by the special provisions of Article 370) until it ceased to exist following the abrogation of Article 370 by the Indian Parliament in August 2019, after which J&K was reorganized into two separate Union Territories.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Event on 26 January 1957 | Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir came into force |
| Drafted by | J&K’s own Constituent Assembly |
| Significance of the date chosen | Coincided with India’s Republic Day, symbolizing J&K’s special relationship with the Indian Union |
| Enabling provision | Article 370 of the Indian Constitution |
| Status after August 2019 | J&K’s separate Constitution ceased to exist after Article 370’s abrogation; state reorganized into two Union Territories (J&K and Ladakh), effective 31 October 2019 |
| Second General Elections (for comparison) | Held in 1957 (India’s second Lok Sabha elections) — occurred in the same year, but is a distinct, unrelated event from J&K’s Constitution coming into force |
| Second Five-Year Plan (for comparison) | Started in 1956 (not specifically tied to 26 January 1957) |
14. The design of the National Flag was adopted by the Constituent Assembly of India in-
(A) July 1946
(B) July 1950
(C) July 1947
(D) August 1947
Answer: (C) July 1947
Explanation: The design of the National Flag of India — the tricolour with the Ashoka Chakra at its center — was adopted by the Constituent Assembly of India on 22nd July, 1947, just a few weeks before India’s independence on 15th August, 1947. This flag was based on the earlier Swaraj Flag of the Indian National Congress, with the charkha (spinning wheel) replaced by the Ashoka Chakra (a 24-spoke wheel representing the Dharma Chakra) to make it a more universally acceptable national symbol for independent India.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Date of adoption | 22nd July, 1947 |
| Adopted by | Constituent Assembly of India |
| Basis of design | Swaraj Flag of Indian National Congress (designed by Pingali Venkayya) |
| Key change made | Charkha (spinning wheel) replaced with Ashoka Chakra (24-spoke wheel) |
| Colours | Saffron (top) – courage/sacrifice; White (middle) – truth/peace; Green (bottom) – fertility/growth |
| Ashoka Chakra represents | Dharma Chakra (Wheel of Law), taken from the Lion Capital of Ashoka at Sarnath |
15. How many members were there in Constituent Assembly ?
(A) 389
(B) 395
(C) 405
(D) 379
Answer: (A) 389
Explanation: The Constituent Assembly of India, as originally constituted under the Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946, was designed to have 389 members in total — comprising 292 members from British Indian provinces, 4 members from the Chief Commissioner’s provinces, and 93 members representing the Princely States. However, following the Partition of India in 1947 and the subsequent withdrawal of Muslim League members (who moved to Pakistan’s separate Constituent Assembly), the actual working strength of the Assembly that framed India’s Constitution was reduced to 299 members.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Original total strength (Cabinet Mission Plan, 1946) | 389 |
| Break-up of original 389 | 292 (British Indian provinces) + 4 (Chief Commissioner’s provinces) + 93 (Princely States) |
| Strength after Partition (1947) | Reduced to 299 (due to Muslim League members’ withdrawal to Pakistan) |
| Basis of formation | Cabinet Mission Plan, 1946 |
16. Which among the following is not correctly matched ?
(A) Schedule Two – Salaries and Allowances
(B) Schedule Five – Scheduled Areas
(C) Schedule Six – Tribal Areas of Assam, Meghalaya and Mizoram
(D) Schedule Ten – Panchayats
Answer: (D) Schedule Ten – Panchayats
Explanation: The incorrectly matched pair is (D) — the Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution does NOT deal with Panchayats; instead, it deals with the Anti-Defection Law, added by the 52nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1985, laying down provisions for the disqualification of MPs/MLAs on grounds of political defection. Panchayats are actually covered under the Eleventh Schedule, added by the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992. The other three matches are correct: the Second Schedule deals with Salaries and Allowances of the President, Governors, Judges, and other officials; the Fifth Schedule deals with the Administration of Scheduled Areas and Scheduled Tribes; and the Sixth Schedule deals with the Administration of Tribal Areas in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Incorrect match | (D) Schedule Ten – Panchayats |
| Correct subject of Tenth Schedule | Anti-Defection Law (added by 52nd Amendment, 1985) |
| Correct Schedule for Panchayats | Eleventh Schedule (added by 73rd Amendment, 1992) |
| Second Schedule (correct) | Salaries, allowances, privileges of President, Governors, Speaker, Judges, CAG, etc. |
| Fifth Schedule (correct) | Administration of Scheduled Areas and Scheduled Tribes (states other than Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, Mizoram) |
| Sixth Schedule (correct) | Administration of Tribal Areas in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram — note option (C) mentions only 3 states (Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram), omitting Tripura, but this is still considered “correctly matched” for the purposes of this MCQ since the core subject match (Tribal Areas) is accurate |
| Twelfth Schedule (for context) | Municipalities (74th Amendment, 1992) |
17. Which of the following parts of Indian Constitution has only one article ?
(A) Part XVII
(B) Part XVIII
(C) Part XIX
(D) Part XX
Answer: (D) Part XX
Explanation: Part XX of the Indian Constitution, titled “Amendment of the Constitution,” contains only a single Article — Article 368 — which lays down the procedure for amending the Constitution (including provisions for simple majority, special majority, and special majority with state ratification, depending on the nature of the provision being amended). This makes Part XX one of the shortest parts of the Constitution in terms of article count, despite dealing with an extremely significant subject matter — the process by which the entire Constitution itself can be legally altered.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Part with only one Article | Part XX |
| Title of Part XX | “Amendment of the Constitution” |
| Article contained | Article 368 |
| Significance of Article 368 | Lays down procedure for constitutional amendments (simple majority / special majority / special majority + state ratification) |
| Part XVII (for comparison) | “Official Language” — contains multiple articles (343–351) |
| Part XVIII (for comparison) | “Emergency Provisions” — contains multiple articles (352–360) |
| Part XIX (for comparison) | “Miscellaneous” — contains multiple articles (361–367) |
18. Which among the following pair is not correctly matched ?
(A) Part Ill – Fundamental Rights.
(B) Part XI – Relationships between the Union and States.
(C) Part XII – Finance, Property, Contracts and Suits.
(D) Part XIX – Amendment of the constitution.
Answer: (D) Part XIX – Amendment of the constitution
Explanation: The incorrectly matched pair is (D). “Amendment of the Constitution” is actually the subject matter of Part XX (containing Article 368), not Part XIX. Part XIX of the Constitution is titled “Miscellaneous” and deals with various residual matters (Articles 361–367) not covered elsewhere, such as protection of the President and Governors from court proceedings, special provisions regarding disputes related to elections of the President/Vice-President, and interpretation-related provisions. The other three matches are correct: Part III does indeed deal with Fundamental Rights; Part XI covers Relations between the Union and the States (legislative and administrative relations); and Part XII deals with Finance, Property, Contracts, and Suits.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Incorrect match | (D) Part XIX – Amendment of the constitution |
| Correct subject of Part XIX | “Miscellaneous” (Articles 361–367) |
| Correct Part for Amendment of the Constitution | Part XX (contains only Article 368) |
| Part III (correct) | Fundamental Rights (Articles 12–35) |
| Part XI (correct) | Relations between the Union and the States (Articles 245–263) |
| Part XII (correct) | Finance, Property, Contracts, and Suits (Articles 264–300A) |
19. Which was the first state established on the basis of linguistic ?
(A) U.P.
(B) Andhra Pradesh
(C) Tamil Nadu
(D) Kerala
Answer: (B) Andhra Pradesh
Explanation: Andhra Pradesh was the first state in independent India to be created purely on a linguistic basis, formed in 1953 by carving out the Telugu-speaking areas from the erstwhile Madras Presidency (state of Madras). This creation was a direct result of a prolonged agitation demanding a separate state for Telugu speakers, which culminated dramatically in the fast-unto-death of the freedom fighter Potti Sriramulu, who died on 15th December 1952 after 58 days of fasting. His death triggered widespread public unrest and forced the Indian government to act, leading to the formation of Andhra State on 1st October 1953. This event, in turn, directly triggered the broader linguistic reorganization of all Indian states through the States Reorganisation Act, 1956.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| First state created on linguistic basis | Andhra Pradesh (initially as “Andhra State”) |
| Year of creation | 1953 (formed 1st October 1953) |
| Carved out from | Madras Presidency (State of Madras) |
| Key figure whose fast triggered creation | Potti Sriramulu (died 15 December 1952, after 58-day fast) |
| Broader consequence | Directly led to the formation of the States Reorganisation Commission (SRC) and the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, which reorganized ALL Indian states on a linguistic basis |
| Later renaming | “Andhra State” was later merged with Telangana region (from Hyderabad State) in 1956 to form the full “Andhra Pradesh” |
WBCS Main Preamble, Citizenship Question Paper – 2015
1. India is Union of States. This means
(A) That the Indian federation is not the result of an agreement between States
(B) That the original federation of States gave way to Sovereign Republic
(C) That the Constituent Assembly has created the unitary State of India
(D) That the making of the Indian Union was preceded by the prolonged struggle for freedom from foreign rule.
Answer: (A) That the Indian federation is not the result of an agreement between States
Explanation: Dr. B. R. Ambedkar explained in the Constituent Assembly debates that the term “Union of States” was deliberately chosen over “Federation of States” to convey two key ideas: first, that the Indian federation is NOT the result of an agreement between previously independent or sovereign states (unlike the USA, where independent states voluntarily came together to form a federal union through mutual agreement); and second, that no state possesses the right to secede from the Union, since it wasn’t formed by consent-based agreement in the first place. This makes the Indian Union indestructible.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Constitutional Article | Article 1 |
| Exact phrase | “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States” |
| Core meaning of “Union” (per Ambedkar) | Indian federation was NOT formed by agreement between states (unlike USA); no state can secede |
| Explained by | Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, in Constituent Assembly debates |
| Contrast with USA | US federation formed via voluntary agreement of independent, pre-existing sovereign states |
2. Who was the chairman of the Constituent Assembly ?
(A) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(B) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(C) Rajagopalachari
(D) Jawaharlal Nehru
Answer: (A) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
Explanation: Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected as the permanent President/Chairman of the Constituent Assembly of India on 11th December 1946, two days after the Assembly’s first session on 9th December 1946. He presided over the Assembly for the entire duration of the constitution-making process (nearly three years) and later became the first President of independent India.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Permanent President/Chairman of Constituent Assembly | Dr. Rajendra Prasad |
| Date elected | 11th December 1946 |
| First session date | 9th December 1946 |
| Temporary/interim Chairman (first sitting only) | Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha |
| Later role of Dr. Rajendra Prasad | First President of independent India |
| Chairman of the Drafting Committee (different role) | Dr. B. R. Ambedkar |
| Objective Resolution mover (different role) | Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru |
3. Name the Chairman of the Fundamental Rights Sub-Committee of the Constituent Assembly :
(A) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
(B) J. B. Kripalani
(C) Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(D) Gopinath Bardoloi
Answer: (B) J. B. Kripalani
Explanation: J. B. Kripalani (Acharya Jivatram Bhagwandas Kripalani) served as the Chairman of the Fundamental Rights Sub-Committee of the Constituent Assembly. This sub-committee was constituted under the broader Advisory Committee on Fundamental Rights, Minorities, and Tribal and Excluded Areas, which was chaired overall by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel. The Fundamental Rights Sub-Committee, under Kripalani’s leadership, was specifically tasked with drafting and finalizing the provisions related to Fundamental Rights (which eventually became Part III of the Constitution), examining various rights proposals and ensuring they aligned with democratic principles while considering practical governance needs.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Chairman of Fundamental Rights Sub-Committee | J. B. Kripalani |
| Broader parent committee | Advisory Committee on Fundamental Rights, Minorities, and Tribal and Excluded Areas |
| Chairman of the broader Advisory Committee | Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel |
| Kripalani’s other notable role (for context) | Also chaired the Ad hoc Committee on the National Flag (as tested in 2016 Q4) |
| Gopinath Bardoloi (for comparison) | Chaired the Sub-Committee on North-East Frontier (Assam) Tribal and Excluded Areas, a different specialized sub-committee |
| Dr. Rajendra Prasad (for comparison) | President of the Constituent Assembly overall — not specifically the Fundamental Rights Sub-Committee Chairman |
4. Which of the following Union Territories attained statehood in February 1987 ?
(A) Arunachal Pradesh
(B) Daman and Diu
(C) Goa
(D) Pondicherry
Answer: (A) Arunachal Pradesh
Explanation: Arunachal Pradesh, which had been a Union Territory since 1972 (having earlier been known as the North-East Frontier Agency, NEFA), attained full statehood on 20th February, 1987, through the State of Arunachal Pradesh Act, 1986. This made it the 24th state of the Indian Union. Notably, Mizoram also attained statehood on the very same date (20 February 1987), becoming the 23rd state, while Daman and Diu and Puducherry (Pondicherry) remain Union Territories to this day, and Goa attained statehood slightly later, on 30th May, 1987.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| State that attained statehood in Feb 1987 | Arunachal Pradesh |
| Exact date | 20th February, 1987 |
| Governing Act | State of Arunachal Pradesh Act, 1986 |
| Former name/status | North-East Frontier Agency (NEFA); Union Territory since 1972 |
| Sequence in Indian Union | 24th State of India |
| Same-day statehood | Mizoram also became a state (23rd) on the very same date, 20 Feb 1987 |
| Goa’s statehood (for comparison) | 30th May, 1987 (25th State) — slightly later than Arunachal Pradesh and Mizoram |
| Daman and Diu, and Pondicherry (for comparison) | Both remain Union Territories to this day; NOT converted to full states |
5. The 53rd Amendment to the Indian Constitution in 1986 inserted a new Article conferring full statehood on :
(A) Mizoram
(B) Tripura
(C) Meghalaya
(D) Nagaland
Answer: (A) Mizoram
Explanation: The Constitution (Fifty-third Amendment) Act, 1986, inserted Article 371G into the Constitution, granting full statehood to Mizoram. This followed the Mizo Accord (Memorandum of Settlement) signed in June 1986 between the Government of India and the Mizo National Front (MNF) leader Laldenga, which ended decades of insurgency in the region. Mizoram thus became the 23rd state of the Indian Union, with statehood effective from 20th February, 1987.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amendment | 53rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1986 |
| Article inserted | Article 371G – Special provision with respect to the State of Mizoram |
| State granted statehood | Mizoram |
| Statehood effective date | 20th February 1987 |
| Sequence in Indian Union | 23rd State of India |
| Background | Mizo Accord (1986) between Government of India and Mizo National Front (Laldenga), ending Mizo insurgency |
| Special protections under Article 371G | Protects Mizo customary law and religious/social practices; ownership/transfer of land in Mizoram cannot be legislated by Parliament without the State Assembly’s consent |
6. What is the special constitutional position of Jammu and Kashmir ?
(A) Indian laws are not applicable
(B) It is not part of the Indian Union
(C) It has its own constitution
(D) It has a separate judiciary
Answer: (C) It has its own constitution
Explanation: Historically, prior to the abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019, Jammu and Kashmir enjoyed special status under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, which allowed it to have its own separate state Constitution (the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, which came into force on 26th January 1957) — a unique privilege not enjoyed by any other Indian state. However, J&K was always very much a part of the Indian Union (Option B is factually incorrect), Indian laws did apply to J&K (with some modifications/exceptions under Article 370, making Option A incorrect), and it did NOT have a fully separate judiciary independent of India’s judicial system, since the Supreme Court of India’s jurisdiction extended to J&K as well (making Option D incorrect).
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Special provision (historical) | Article 370 |
| J&K’s separate Constitution | Came into force 26th January 1957; ceased to exist after August 2019 |
| Was J&K part of the Indian Union? | Yes, always — Option (B) is factually incorrect |
| Did Indian laws apply to J&K? | Yes, with certain modifications/exceptions under Article 370 — Option (A) is incorrect |
| Did J&K have a separate judiciary? | No — Supreme Court of India’s jurisdiction extended to J&K — Option (D) is incorrect |
| Major constitutional change | Article 370 abrogated on 5 August 2019; J&K’s separate Constitution ceased to exist; state reorganized into two Union Territories (J&K and Ladakh), effective 31 October 2019 |
7. The preamble to the Indian Constitution was amended in which year ?
(A) 1974
(B) 1975
(C) 1976
(D) 1977
Answer: (C) 1976
Explanation: The Preamble to the Indian Constitution was amended in 1976, through the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, which inserted the words “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity” into the Preamble’s text. This amendment was enacted during the period of National Emergency (1975–1977) under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s government, and remains the only instance in which the Preamble’s original text has been amended.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Year of Preamble amendment | 1976 |
| Amendment | 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act |
| Words added to Preamble | “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity” |
| Original (1950) Preamble wording | “Sovereign Democratic Republic…unity of the Nation” |
| Amended Preamble wording | “Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic…unity and integrity of the Nation” |
| Enacted during | National Emergency (1975–1977), PM Indira Gandhi |
| Number of times Preamble amended | Only once (1976) |
8. The drafting committee of the Indian Constitution was formed by the Constituent Assembly on :
(A) 29th August, 1947
(B) 30th August, 1948
(C) 29th August, 1946
(D) 30th August, 1949
Answer: (A) 29th August, 1947
Explanation: The Drafting Committee of the Constituent Assembly was formally constituted on 29th August, 1947, just two weeks after India’s independence on 15th August, 1947. This seven-member committee, chaired by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, was tasked with scrutinizing the initial draft Constitution (prepared by Constitutional Advisor B. N. Rau) in meticulous detail and preparing the final draft for consideration, debate, and adoption by the full Constituent Assembly. The Committee worked diligently over the following two years, holding extensive deliberations before the Constitution was finally adopted on 26th November, 1949.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Date Drafting Committee formed | 29th August, 1947 |
| Chairman | Dr. B. R. Ambedkar |
| Total members | 7 (including Ambedkar) |
| Other members | N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar, Alladi Krishnaswamy Ayyar, Dr. K. M. Munshi, Syed Mohammad Saadullah, N. Madhava Rau, T. T. Krishnamachari |
| Preceding step | Initial draft prepared by Constitutional Advisor B. N. Rau, before being handed to this Committee for detailed scrutiny |
| Timeline context | Formed just 2 weeks after Independence (15 Aug 1947); Constitution finally adopted over 2 years later, on 26 Nov 1949 |
9. The Constitution of India was enacted by a Constituent Assembly set-up under the recommendation of :
(A) Cabinet Mission Plan
(B) Wavell Plan
(C) Mountbatten Plan
(D) Crips Mission
Answer: (A) Cabinet Mission Plan
Explanation: The Constituent Assembly of India, which eventually enacted the Constitution, was constituted according to the proposals put forth by the Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946. The Cabinet Mission, comprising three British Cabinet ministers — Lord Pethick-Lawrence, Sir Stafford Cripps, and A. V. Alexander — visited India in 1946 and proposed a scheme for indirect election of Constituent Assembly members by Provincial Legislative Assembly members, along with representation from the Princely States, leading to the formation of the 389-member Assembly that first met on 9th December, 1946.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Basis of Constituent Assembly’s formation | Cabinet Mission Plan, 1946 |
| Members of Cabinet Mission | Lord Pethick-Lawrence, Sir Stafford Cripps, A. V. Alexander |
| Original Constituent Assembly strength | 389 members |
| Method of election | Indirect election by Provincial Legislative Assembly members + nomination from Princely States |
| First meeting date | 9th December 1946 |
| Cripps Mission (different, earlier event) | 1942 mission led by Stafford Cripps alone, proposing Dominion Status — rejected by Congress; did NOT create the Constituent Assembly |
| Mountbatten Plan (different, later event) | June 1947 plan leading to Partition and transfer of power — unrelated to the Assembly’s formation |
| Wavell Plan (different event) | Associated with the Shimla Conference, 1945, focused on forming an interim government — also unrelated to the Assembly’s formation |
10. In the National Flag which colour is used in the wheel ?
(A) Black
(B) White
(C) Navy Blue
(D) Blue
Answer: (C) Navy Blue
Explanation: The Ashoka Chakra, the 24-spoke wheel placed at the center of the National Flag of India, is colored Navy Blue. It is positioned in the center of the white band of the tricolour flag, and it represents the “Dharma Chakra” (Wheel of Law), which was originally found on the Lion Capital of Ashoka at Sarnath. The Navy Blue color, along with the wheel’s 24 spokes, symbolizes movement, progress, and the eternal wheel of righteousness/law that should guide the nation. While often loosely referred to simply as “blue” in casual conversation, the precise official color specified for the Ashoka Chakra is Navy Blue.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Colour of the wheel (Ashoka Chakra) | Navy Blue |
| Name of the wheel | Ashoka Chakra (Dharma Chakra / Wheel of Law) |
| Number of spokes | 24 |
| Position on flag | Center of the white band |
| Origin of design | Lion Capital of Ashoka at Sarnath |
| Symbolism | Represents movement, progress, and eternal wheel of righteousness/law |
11. Fill in the Blank : The Union Territories are specified in the _____
(A) 2nd Schedule
(B) 1st Schedule
(C) 3rd Schedule
(D) 4th Schedule
Answer: (B) 1st Schedule
Explanation: The First Schedule of the Indian Constitution specifies the names of the States and Union Territories that comprise the Indian Union, along with their respective territorial extents (i.e., which districts/areas fall within each state or Union Territory’s boundaries). This schedule is directly linked to Article 1 of the Constitution, which declares “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States,” and it provides the detailed, official listing of all constituent states and Union Territories that make up the country, subject to periodic amendments whenever new states are created or boundaries are altered.
Notes:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Schedule | First Schedule |
| Subject matter | Names of States and Union Territories, along with their territorial extent |
| Related Article | Article 1 – “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States” |
| Nature of content | Lists all States and UTs; updated periodically through amendments whenever states are created, renamed, or reorganized |
| Second Schedule (for comparison) | Salaries and Allowances of President, Governors, Judges, etc. |
| Third Schedule (for comparison) | Forms of Oaths and Affirmations |
| Fourth Schedule (for comparison) | Allocation of seats in the Rajya Sabha to States/UTs |
Read more:
- WBCS Prelims Indian Economy Questions and Answers
- WBCS Main Census & Demography Questions and Answers
Sourch of questions: WBPSC official website
